<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1039</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:09:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1039</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[does the US government violate this patent for some of their secure services (IRS etc)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: what a freak, and freaking JOKE</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1020</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:08:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1020</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You know, if you guys added clarity and sanity to your comments, you might not look like idiots and people might even agree with you.<br />
<br />
You can always tell when the article is essentially correct. Half the trolls try to deflect from the article, while others either attack the author or act like they just ate the strange looking mushroom they found in the back of the fridge.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c836</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eponymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:04:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c836</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It can mean the difference between murder and manslaughter, or between murder and aggravated murder, but in any case the direct actions of LEOs appears to have caused the death of a citizen.<br />
<br />
With pepper spray and tasers readily available, I see this as a complete and utter failure to use the appropriate response to a noncompliant subject.  Hell, with 9 of them, they could have just dog-piled onto the guy and subdued him with their sheer weight while someone got cuffs on him.  Close enough to strike with a blunt object is close enough to use multiple other tactics to subdue, especially when fully equipped officers are dealing with an unarmed person.<br />
<br />
I truly hope they burn for this savagery.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1000</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:01:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1000</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is such a ludicrous charge coming from you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: what a freak, and freaking JOKE</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c983</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:01:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c983</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Literally no one said it was ok...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Racketeering</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c980</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:59:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c980</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Even more reasonable:<br />
<br />
"If I loose I'm going to go bankrupt and this patent is going to be sold to who knows who and if I win my funds are unfrozen and I can reimburse you."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c976</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:57:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c976</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So you're mad that he's got a consistent position but doesn't always use the same words to describe it?  That's your idea of a 'marked contrast,' espousing the same opinion over the same issue only being less angry about it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c959</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:54:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c959</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No one said it was different?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c951</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:53:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c951</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Forgot to say, the fact that the man got a patent on two factor authentication just shows how poorly the patent process is conducted.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c939</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:53:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c939</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, it doesn't "makes patent trolling sound like a wonderful and acceptable way to do things".  It brands patent trolling a bad strategic move that especially doesn't make sense in this case since the perpetrator is already facing racketeering charges.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c915</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:52:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c915</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>But what he ACTUALLY does is steal the income stream from the work of others, and funnel it into his OWN pocket. Geez, that's just sickening coming from a grifting millionaire.</i><br />
<br />
What, and record labels don't?<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110404/12211913771/record-labels-may-owe-artists-close-to-2-billion-lawsuits-ramp-up-with-rick-james-lead.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110404/12211913771/record-labels-may-owe-artists-close-to-2-billion-lawsuits-ramp-up-with-rick-james-lead.shtml</a><br />
<br />
Besides, Mike regularly calls them both out when they do something wrong or stupid, as Dotcom just did. <br />
<br />
But don't let your unrequited passion for Mike cloud your judgement or anything!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c913</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:52:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c913</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Last I checked, the prior art requirement doesn't require that a previous patent exists. It just requires that a device that performs the functions stated in the patent in the same or a similar manner exists.<br />
<br />
Take the wheel as an example. The wheel (in it's traditional form, not the strange/wacky modern reinventions of the wheel) was never patented yet, you can't just go to the USPTO and say "I want to patent the wheel". You can't because prior art exists.<br />
<br />
Of course, IANAL, if anyone wants to pitch it, please do.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c889</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:49:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c889</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nothing in the article above is a justification of Kim's actions.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: &quot;reasonably monetize what might be considered infringement under the law&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c460</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:49:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c460</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why don't you go and write a fanfic piece about some characters and settings copyrighted by Disney and let us know how it works out for you?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c880</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:48:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c880</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And you, and other apologists, don't see the problem if Megaupload loses, do you?<br />
<br />
That's because, unlike other copyright and patent trolls, and I disagree with Dotcom on this issue, but unlike others who only seek to gain money and do nothing else, the Megaupload case DOES apply to other internet companies.  If Megaupload loses, it won't be long before the MAFIAAA decides that if they can take down Megaupload, why not try for Youtube, Google, Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, ETC.?<br />
<br />
There's more at stake here than someone being a patent troll, which is unlike other patent trolls which just seek to cause disruption in the market place.<br />
<br />
If Megaupload fails in court, then the entire internet community could be in trouble.<br />
<br />
Remember how we reacted to SOPA?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c876</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:47:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c876</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's patent trolling in this case.  It's unequivocally what Kim is threatening here.  Let's not mince words.  Average joe doesn't need to be wrong about everything.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>more dissembling by Masnick</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c345</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[staff]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:46:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c345</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[More dissembling by Mad Mike.<br />
<br />]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c872</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:45:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c872</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't want to put words in his mouth but the article doesn't read like Mike thinks trolling is a good idea here either.<br />
<br />
The DMCA doesn't apply in criminal cases?  The safe harbor is for criminal charges too.  For a wannabe lawyer that's a pretty stupid thing to say.  Any case over the DMCA has the potential to set bad precedent (or good) what tilts this towards bad is that Kim isn't a particularly sympathetic case.  And it would absolutely be bad for the 'tech' industry as a whole if a bas precedent was set on the DMCA just because a court didn't like Kim very much (a very real possibility).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c859</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:45:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c859</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's Masnick's headline, in case you missed it:<br />
<br />
<i>Kim Dotcom Threatens To Sue Google, Facebook And Twitter Over 2-Factor Authentication Patent If They Don't Help Him</i><br />
<br />
And here's a later line from his story:<br />
<br />
<i>"Specifically, he's asking them to help fund his defense, in exchange for not getting sued for the patent."</i><br />
<br />
That is Msasnick parsing words, not me. I see it for the extortion it is: Fund Dotcom's defense or be sued for an unrelated matter.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c211</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:44:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c211</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm not convinced. It's like turning music business into a charity social club. It makes the people using it seem desperate, whereas something like Kickstarter is just "This is my project, you contribute X amount and get Y content." Done.<br />
<br />
It's not a bad idea but I seriously doubt it will take off.<br />
<br />
(BTW, Techdirt keeps freezing at random intervals. The heck is going on?)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>