<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1185</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:38:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1185</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You only said it's a "potentially poorly thought out strategic move that could backfire" because of the racketeering charges. You did "focus[] on the idiocy of extortion more than the idiocy of the patent itself," because you didn't focus on the idiocy of the patent itself AT ALL. So of course any other thing you did mention received more focus than you gave to the patent itself, since that's more focus than zero focus. The only one pretending you "said stuff [you] didn't" is you.<br />
<br />
It's the stuff you DIDN'T say that we're focusing on. You didn't say it was patent trolling that is a bad thing regardless of the racketeering angle. You didn't question the validity of the patent itself. You pointed out that he's saying pay up or I'll sue, and then you said that his victims should consider paying up and playing along because there's a "pretty good reason for the tech industry to think about participating in the case." That's you justifying his means because of the ends. That's not you condemning his means. You didn't condemn the means, hence our responses.<br />
<br />
Sorry Mike, but you look pretty bad here. And, of course, it's Kim Dotcom, so you give him a free pass with this stuff. No surprise there. The only surprise would have been if you had actually called him out for the "extortion" and said that was bad in general, and not just bad because it might hurt him in later litigation. Nice try and spinning this, but we can all see what you wrote.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c69</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_horse_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:34:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c69</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At no point in this story does Mike say that murder is wrong. He's a murderer apologist. He parses words. Words bad.<br />
<br />
He's words apolologist.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dotcom Can't sue</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1178</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth Michaels]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:32:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1178</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, Dotcom can sue, but the moment a defendant is ordered to pay, the DOJ would step in and order seizure of the proceeds. All Dotcom can do is sell full interest in the patent to a bona fide buyer at arms length - and in a foreign country. <br />
<br />
That is why Dotcom has asked for anyone who is interested in buying the patents to contact him.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1163</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trails]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:31:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1163</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You read one sentence, try the whole article.  I know it's hard, but I'll give you a hint.  The bit you quoted, what's the antecedent of "That"?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: &quot;reasonably monetize what might be considered infringement under the law&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c476</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:31:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c476</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Fan Fiction is NOT, and CAN NOT be copyright infringement, because there is nothing copied at all. <br />
<br />
US: "102 (b) In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work."<br />
<br />
Copyright is about the exact form, and not about an "idea" or a "concept".</i><br />
<br />
I agree with you in theory, but the courts have generally ruled otherwise.  See: <a href='http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8887709316369349826&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2&amp;as_vis=1&amp;oi=scholarr' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8887709316369349826&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2&amp;as_vis=1&amp;oi=scholarr</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1140</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:29:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1140</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>If IV trolled someone but then pointed out that they should cave in because it was in their best interests on some unrelated matter, do you think Mike would think it was a good idea then?</em><br />
<br />
Does Mike think it's a good idea <em>now?</em><br />
<br />
No. He called it "a potentially poorly thought out strategic move that could backfire." Admittedly, I'd like him to use stronger language too, but what can you do.<br />
<br />
On the other hand - if it were IV doing this sort of trolling, you would be on their side, saying that they're just "protecting their property," and that anyone who is against it just hates patent law and loves patent piracy, or some such nonsense.<br />
<br />
Then, spam the comments with some misreading of unrelated case law, or misstatements of the Founders' opinions, or multiple "Y u no debate meeeee!" posts at Mike, or some other idiotic attempt to derail the conversation. Just like you always do.<br />
<br />
<em>I don't think the DMCA applies in criminal cases, but even if it did, what's going to happen that would affect others like Google?</em><br />
<br />
That's not the only issue, of course, but even if it were, then it would mean that the government could seize Google (or whoever the next Google is), even though they are completely compliant with the DMCA.<br />
<br />
All they would have to do is take Viacom's accusations (or whoever the next equivalent of Viacom is), claim that shows probable cause for <em>criminal</em> infringement, and boom! Instant seizure, shutdown, and arrest. No DMCA defense, no advance notice, no prior chance to defend their actions. And all their assets would be frozen, so no money to mount a legal defense.<br />
<br />
That's <em>exactly</em> what happened to Megaupload.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1128</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Groove Tiger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:27:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1128</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, I know what you mean.<br />
<br />
Words is hard!<br />
<br />
I guess more normal people can read "parsed words" just fine.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: I'm glad they actually arrested these guys</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c2022</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miff]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:27:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c2022</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Obviously you miss when you could strangle a guy in front of 30 witnesses and not even get told you did a bad thing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c2010</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Borucki]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:25:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c2010</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Update: CBS has been informed by an undisclosed source that said water balloon terrorists were discovered to have scribbled pro-Islamic messages on high school bathroom stall door in Crayola crayon, Cosmic Cobalt color, to be exact. DHS anti-terrorism officers in tanks apprehended terrorists, who are said to have been armed with weaponized water devices.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1118</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:23:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1118</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just to clarify for those making false statements: Yes, this is patent trolling.  Yes, I think it's a bad idea (as pretty clearly stated in the post).  I focused on the idiocy of extortion more than the idiocy of the patent itself, because the extortion part is a much bigger deal.  But I agree that it's a bad patent and it's extortion.  People who think I support Dotcom in this, or in other stuff, are wrong.  Which is pretty clear from the article, unless you don't read it all the way through and pretend I said stuff I didn't.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1102</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:22:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1102</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As I said before, Megaupload was protected by Safe Harbors as they followed the DMCA in taking down any file that was said to be infringing.<br />
<br />
The only reason they left that one up was because law enforcement said to not take it down.<br />
<br />
They got screwed over by the law for following the law.<br />
<br />
So, even if you think that other companies would be unaffected because they have Safe Harbors, remember that Megaupload did as well, and look at what happened.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: whatever</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c428</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:20:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c428</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Daddy, Copyright math is hard...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: whatever</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c403</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Groove Tiger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:18:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c403</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, with RIAA math, you have to recoup 5000 hours, so it took you zero minutes to come up with it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: If the system could be changed, do away with trolling entirely!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c366</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Groove Tiger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:16:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c366</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[TL;DR: "MIKE, Y U NO GENERALIZE!"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c978</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:15:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c978</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If that's the case, why can't I go to Flickr, download images, and use them in a TV advertisement? The ad wouldn't be "competing" with the photo. And Scroll Kit actually had the replica available online, which is very clearly in conflict with the Times' efforts to monetize.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>It's all blackmail</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1078</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DanZee]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:14:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1078</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think Kim Dotcom is just being honest about something that takes place every day, namely corporate lawyers using legal blackmail to make other companies and individuals do what they want.  Here, Dotcom will give Amazon, etc., a license to use his patent in return for joining him on his lawsuit and loaning him money until he can unfreeze his assets.  Companies make these sorts of arrangements all the time.  Kim's just being more upfront about it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>75 million customers? That 75 million simultaneous lawsuits</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c336</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:14:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c336</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You signed away your right to class action lawsuits against at$t.<br />
<br />
There seem to be a lot of good minds around here. Surely a kick starter campaign could be set up. Flood the courts with 750 million individual suites. Setup the paperwork to where you sign your name, send it to court.<br />
Even if only ten percent completed their cases...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1059</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:14:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1059</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>The DMCA doesn't apply in criminal cases? The safe harbor is for criminal charges too.</i><br />
<br />
Why's it stupid? I don't say things unless I have some basis for thinking it. See, for example, Copyhype: <a href='http://www.copyhype.com/2012/01/megaupload-and-the-dmca/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.copyhype.com/2012/01/megaupload-and-the-dmca/</a><br />
<br />
Even if the safe harbors were possible, there would be no protection for a person who otherwise would meet of standard of a criminal infringer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c51</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:13:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c51</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Those "smartphones" really can be smart sometimes."<br />
<br />
Not smart, it's just basic survival instinct. If you were stuck next to someone else's butt, you'd dial 911 too.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1057</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greevar]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:12:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1057</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Don't reply to the trolls, just hit report and spend your time talking to a rational person instead.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>