<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: A sad misunderstanding</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1458</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:56:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1458</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Mike advocates that copyright should promote progress, <i>whatever the means."</i><br />
<br />
That's kind of the problem.... the 'whatever that means' part.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The new Socrates</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c231</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PopeRatzo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:55:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c231</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote> We need to learn to value "non-productive" pursuits</blockquote>Further, we need to learn to value "non-productive" <em>people</em>.  It looks like we've already hit "peak labor" but the antiquated and useless idea that "everybody has to work to live" is doing nothing but dividing people and causing further misery and strife, especially in developed nations.<br />
<br />
In America, we have this sick Calivinist notion of "earning a living", as if the only acceptable life is a life spent toiling 70% of your waking hours to make someone in the economic elite richer.<br />
<br />
The fact that we have people working longer hours than ever even though a greater number of people are unemployed shows just how badly we need a change of values.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: A sad misunderstanding</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1443</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:32:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1443</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[err...exclusive *rights*]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c209</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:32:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c209</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.motherjones.com/media/2013/05/robots-artificial-intelligence-jobs-automation?page=1' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.motherjones.com/media/2013/05/robots-artificial-intelligence-jobs-automation?page=1</a><br />
<br />
In the interest of promoting discussion.<br />
<br />
This article says the same thing actually except that our jobs will eventually be replaced with robots and while it will be slow and will be a dark time for us meat-bags we will eventually be able to co-exist with the machines that took our jobs.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: A sad misunderstanding</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1440</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:31:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1440</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>He'll never put things into perspective or acknowledge that there are even positives.</i><br />
<br />
<br />
You are the one looking at this issue with blinders on, most likely because you wish copyright to continue as an income stream for the lawyers.<br />
<br />
Mike advocates that copyright should promote progress, whatever the means. You are the one who has decided that granting authors exclusive is the *only* path. Your narrow view leaves out way too many possibilities that could achieve the same ends.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3661</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:30:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3661</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Diversion, baseless emotional ploys, empty labeling and religious criticism. That's the extent of your worthless argument. Naturally you must resort to attacking the foundation of millions of people's morals because they contradict homosexuality, but even without going that route, there are also millions of other non-religious folk who also disapprove for obvious reasons.<br />
<br />
About the oft-trotted 'two consenting adults' argument: what, one adult is bad but two is ok? What genius came up with that logic fail? So if two adults decide that they want to marry their dog, that should be ok, right?<br />
<br />
As far as people's 1st Amendment rights go, yes, that's correct about not bringing religion into the classroom. However, it's also true that the taxpayers aren't paying for the public schools to indoctrinate children with the gay lifestyle; this constitutes an infringement upon their religious freedom, 1A rights.<br />
<br />
Here, enjoy your gay parade:<br />
<a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VE3XFJzdgZo' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VE3XFJzdgZo</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c760</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica Benjamin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:25:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c760</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'll be amazed if Monsarrat's lawyer comes out of this unscathed. In my opinion, this appears to be the kind of action that gets one disbarred. <br />
<br />
And as for Monsarrat showing up at people's houses at night, apparently he's unfamiliar with Massachusetts anti-stalking laws.<br />
<br />
Regarding the sale of Monsarrat's former company for 160 Million Dollars, I am still waiting to see this number confirmed by anyone besides Monsarrat himself.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: A sad misunderstanding</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1422</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:18:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1422</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>Under copyright law, most artists did not have ownerhip or control over the end product. They were forced to assign ownership and control of their copyrights to a third party (record labels, publishers, or studios), and merely received some form of royalties due to the copyright owner's exploitation of these rights.</b><br />
<br />
Incorrect.  Nobody is ever forced.  There is no law that says you <b>must</b> sell your work to someone else to exploit.  That is a choice, not a legal requirement.<br />
<br />
As for Mr McCartney, he makes quite a bit performing concerts as a result of his reputation built up through the copyright works he wrote and recorded over his career.  On the years that he does not tour, his income from royalties is significantly higher.  It should also be pointed out that in 2004, the Beatles catalog was not available on Itunes and other places.<br />
<br />
<b>Less than 10% of artists on a major label wer ever able to recoup their costs, meaning that they made not one cent on artist royatlies. </b><br />
<br />
Many of those same artists use the work and it's wide distribution and promotion to be able to build a fan base and charge for access to their live shows.  You seem to have a very limited understanding of what a label deal involves and what artist can get as a result.  If they are forced back to working at the 7-11 after that, they likely are not the artist that the public wants to hear from, read, or buy art from, plain and simple.  You don't see successful and popular bands working at the 7-11 (except for fun).<br />
<br />
<b>Even with this protection, the vast majority of creative artists were forced to make their living "in other ways." </b><br />
<br />
it depends on what you consider as a creative artist.   There is no unlimited source of revenue to pay people who feel they are an artist, the system is built so that those who are appreciated by the public can make a living being an artist.  Copyright and all that goes with it means that song writers can write songs without having to spend their time performing for the public, or that book writers who are not good public speakers aren't forced to do speaking tours or lecture for a living in order to be able to support their hobby of writing.  <br />
<br />
Would you, as Mike Masnick appears to want to, deny the artists the rights to own the material they create?  Are musical artists lesser than a painter or a sculptor?  Does a writer lose ownership once he publishes a single copy of his book?   Is a singer forced to sing for their supper because they have no way to own their works and creations?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c188</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:17:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c188</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Timothy, I don't think you've really thought this all the way through. Self-driving cars is a relatively easy problem that could put all taxi and truck drivers out of work. The bigger problems happen after singularity. Once computers are "smarter" than the people who designed them (singularity), they will design the next generation of computers. The intelligence of the machines could continue to grow exponentially while human intelligence grows at a much slower rate. Soon humans will also be out of work doing things like phone attendant, car designer, drug designer, physicist, etc... <br />
<br />
I don't even know if the creative fields are safe. <br />
<br />
The free market economy can't deal with this and perhaps centrally planned economies will make a come back only this time instead of being planned by corrupt humans, it will be planned by computers.<br />
<br />
*If* singularity occurs, mankind is going to have a tough time adjusting to being the second smartest group on the planet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c166</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:17:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c166</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Certainly robots, both AI and not, can and have replaced humans in various positions where said humans performed robot like functions, and it was relatively easy to do.  Beyond that, it becomes much more complicated and it is highly questionable whether this "AI robot takeover" is even possible.  There is no doubt many areas where humans can be replaced with highly specialized AI, but is it really cost effective and what is the ROI?  In addition, the simple replacement of a job function does not imply intelligence.  "Artificial Intelligence" has become a widely accepted term, it is also widely misused and misunderstood.  I'm sure many people have AI related products to sell and their opinions are set accordingly, but the future of AI is not as predictable and certain some would have you think.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c287</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:10:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c287</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why in God's name do you feel that Nintendo, a corporation with no amounts of resources on their own, should be able to destroy the livelihoods of people that either make game videos for a living or decide what games to play?<br />
<br />
Did Nintendo go their house and decide to play the game?  Did they work to help these people create better content?  Did Nintendo do any work on creating the videos and the unique experiences that people worked hours to achieve?  Do they even need this money to produce more games since they've done quite well in doing so before now?<br />
<br />
Why should they feel so entitled to get paid off of other's work?<br />
<br />
It's absolutely amazing to me that <i>anyone</i> feels that Nintendo is in the right when we recognize that their position is going to make the public worse off.  That's not the point of copyright in chilling free speech or allowing a company to feel entitled.  It's supposed to act as a subsidy for <i>more speech</i>.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08111723117/want-to-destroy-any-hope-serious-cybersecurity-give-doj-its-desired-backdoor-wiretaps-all-communications.shtml#c172</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:03:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08111723117/want-to-destroy-any-hope-serious-cybersecurity-give-doj-its-desired-backdoor-wiretaps-all-communications.shtml#c172</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The problem when the Congress asks for better "cybersecurity" they usually mean better "cyber-offense".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Repetition the key to success!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/14465423109/aps-attempt-drming-news-shuts-down.shtml#c136</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:03:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/14465423109/aps-attempt-drming-news-shuts-down.shtml#c136</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[For added emphasis, post the same stuff multiple times...<br />
Um...Never Mind!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1287</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DavidSG]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:57:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1287</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well then, you'd better read the post @ 3:13am by G Thompson! He actually seems to be talking from knowledge, not supposition.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Additional search warrants executed</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/18051923103/footage-lethal-beating-deleted-seized-phone-sheriff-asks-fbi-to-take-over-investigation.shtml#c915</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:53:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/18051923103/footage-lethal-beating-deleted-seized-phone-sheriff-asks-fbi-to-take-over-investigation.shtml#c915</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Local news outlets reported yesterday that search warrants were executed on the Kern Medical Center and the Mary K. Shell Mental Health Center. The Sheriff's Department obtained surveillance video and some of David Silva's medical records.  These materials have not been released to the public.<br />
<br />
<br />]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>find new job new you</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130516/10513523106/att-continues-to-mock-concept-net-neutrality-this-time-with-google-hangouts-block.shtml#c398</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[job]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:42:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130516/10513523106/att-continues-to-mock-concept-net-neutrality-this-time-with-google-hangouts-block.shtml#c398</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[applications are preloaded.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c147</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:40:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c147</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>There isn't anything that humans can do that machines are naturally incapable of doing, just things that we haven't yet figured out how to make machines do. </i><br />
<br />
Note the "we" in that sentence.<br />
<br />
My observation is that everything that we <i>thought</i> required "intelligence", e.g. chess, has turned out in practice to be susceptible to a brute force approach of one kind or another. We are still absolutely no nearer having a machine that is really intelligent - as defined by your own criterion "being able to figure out how to do things it can't yet do."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3637</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark Helmet]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:31:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3637</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["God cannot judge us for going off and doing our own thing when he is supposedly the one who gave us free will in the first place."<br />
<br />
It deserves pointing out that the concept of a God granting us free will is illogical.  If God gave it to me, it is not truly free will.<br />
<br />
When people ask me if we have free will, I answer, "Of course, we have no choice."  But unlike the religious, at least I know I'm being ironic.*<br />
<br />
*Borrowed from Christopher Hitchens]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08111723117/want-to-destroy-any-hope-serious-cybersecurity-give-doj-its-desired-backdoor-wiretaps-all-communications.shtml#c163</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shon Gale]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:24:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08111723117/want-to-destroy-any-hope-serious-cybersecurity-give-doj-its-desired-backdoor-wiretaps-all-communications.shtml#c163</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They can keep it up and I will cancel my internet, my cell phone, my cable TV and have nothing to do with satellites. I will go back to News Papers delivered to my home. I will watch only broadcast television and put my land line back in.<br />
Then it will be just like the old days when the FBI only tried to infiltrate us and set us up in a sting. They can tap my land line and I will make up stuff to talk about. Gotta keep those guys busy listening.<br />
Remember this is a huge country and there's lot of land where no one lives. It's easy to escape the city life. Just get on a bus, Gus, drive your car Lar, and get the hell out of there.<br />
Everytime I think of our current government I think of Star Wars and the wise words of Princess Leia:<br />
"The tighter your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c131</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shon Gale]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:04:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c131</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The only Robots I'm worried about are the Drones guided by humans. I'll shoot them down if they fly over my property.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>