<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c123</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:10:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c123</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Might get us less porn too though if the porn companies have to pay out.  That is not so good :-P]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c98</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:09:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c98</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[pretty sure popups existed by 1998.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c431</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:07:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c431</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote> If they send up a helicopter it probably takes 3 cops. If they send up a drone, it takes one with a joystick. Saves the taxpayers money. </blockquote><br />
<br />
No, it doesn't. It just means that they'll do three times as much surveillance.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>What do you honestly think they are going to do with these drones? Spy on you? Are you really that important?</blockquote><br />
<br />
As with the other spying issues, the point isn't that you, or I, in particular are being surveilled. It's that massive surveillance has a large number of detrimental effects to society as a whole, and that the cops &amp; spy outfits have repeatedly demonstrated, over a period of many decades, that they will inevitably use their new power to do things like suppress legitimate dissent, punish political enemies, etc.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>If you don't want to be seen nude in your backyard than don't go outside without clothes on</blockquote><br />
<br />
This is a stunning statement. So now we have to refrain from legal activity in the privacy of our own land just so cops get to play with their new toys?<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Stop bitching about everything that the government does</blockquote><br />
<br />
I don't bitch about everything the government does. I bitch about the things I see the government doing wrong. This is not only my right, but it is my <i>responsibility</i> as a citizen.<br />
<br />
For the record, I don't think the drones issue is nearly as big of a deal as the telephone spying, but there's no reason not to call out both of these as issues that need to be addressed.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Of course there were</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c77</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChrisB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:06:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c77</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Of course there were pop-up ads pre-2000. I remember getting them while in university (1997) when looking at por ... um ... travel sites.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c68</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:04:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c68</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ha, I have complained to companies that I subscribe to, verizon, AAA, etc, who keep sending me Ads to join their service via snail mail. and they just won't stop<br />
<br />
I doubt netflix will bother with stopping a pop-up]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c405</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:03:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c405</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If they are restricted to flying over 'dangerous' territory, i.e. desserts, mountains and forests, then I see no real problem with them. That is flown over territory where a crash is unlikely to hurt anyone, and if a manned aircraft went down rescue attempts would be expensive and difficult.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Umm, Google has you all accustomed to its spying.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c395</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:59:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c395</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Your message ends up getting ignored and you get belittled. You do more harm than good.</blockquote><br />
<br />
Indeed. Speaking as a person who is highly critical of Google and encourages people to be wary of them, Blue's attempts are counterproductive in the extreme. He comes off as a lunatic, and so allows people to write off folks who point out the real trade-offs Google presents as just one of the lunatic crowd.<br />
<br />
If Blue really wanted to raise awareness about Googly issues, he'd be well advised to talk like a rational person. Or, if that's impossible, to at least shut up and let others do the job.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c37</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChurchHatesTucker]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:58:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c37</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A patent on calling a function. <br />
<br />
Job well done, Luke S. Wassum, Primary Examiner!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c28</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ima Fish]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:53:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c28</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["<i>almost always advertising Netflix</i>"<br />
<br />
There should be a cookie that indicates you already have a Netflix account so you'd get a different ad.  Netflix is wasting a lot of money advertising to its own customers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c393</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:53:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c393</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Obama instantly answered that "USA already had found the right balance."</blockquote><br />
<br />
What a jackass response.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Point of curiosity...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c23</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:47:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c23</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><b>(almost always advertising Netflix, by the way)</b></blockquote> <br />
<br />
I've noticed that too.  What sorcery do they use to get that through?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1255</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AC Unknown]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:45:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1255</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And you wonder why Mike doesn't even bother with you OR AJ.  You keep on attacking him and the people who read this blog (BTW, I'm NOT 14 years old.  Been on the earth since the MN Twins won their first World Series.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c750</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:44:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c750</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>They have made voter fraud a spectator sport, arm our enemies (their allies) and are preparing tax us to death</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c408</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:42:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c408</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Quick, look in your mirror.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c16</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:41:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c16</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Am I the only one feeling ambivalent toward this?<br />
<br />
<br />
One one hand, it is patent trolling.<br />
<br />
<br />
On the other hand, anything that gets us less pop-up ads is fine by me :)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1235</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:40:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1235</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[every single writer who works in media either online or off will tell you how wildly inaccurate virtually every single assumption you just made is...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c396</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:40:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c396</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The hidden agenda is we have to stop this self publishing movement before it takes away most of out market.<br />
I will post again the link <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/hugh_howey_self_publishing_is_the_future_and_great_for_writers/" rel="nofollow"> Hugh Howey on self publishing</a>, which is the result of an informal survey of book authors that have gone the self publishing route.<br />
The main point that comes out is that many more authors can earn some money, about the same as most published authors, on a smaller fan base, and therefore sales.<br />
Obviously the respondents self selected, but the point is a large number were making money from ebooks without being well known.<br />
The definite conclusion from the article is that for ebooks, an author is best going the self published route, at least at first.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c389</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:36:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c389</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The greater the persuasive force of third party papers mentioned here, the longer the TD articles mocking same.  Mr. Pessach's "essay" must have struck a raw nerve indeed...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1227</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:36:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1227</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't know. I think that an entry level wage for a writer is probably around $30,000. Add to that employer payroll taxes of around 20% (I assume Masnick treats you as an independent contractor, rather than a bonafide employee). Then most companies contribute modestly toward health insurance, so call that $4,000. That adds up to about $40,000/year based on fifty, forty hour weeks; which is about $20/hour. As you are a bit more than entry level and (presumably) part-time; the rate should be somewhat higher- $25-$30 per hour at a minimum. Assuming the writer worked 40 hours per week to produce those articles, I'd say a minimum of $3200/moth for an inexperienced writer and double that for an experienced one.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c10</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[fogbugzd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:35:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c10</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There was a "Pop-Up Killer" application in 1999, which suggests that the popups predated the patent application.  <br />
<br />
You can read the original patent at <a href='http://www.google.com/patents/US7353229' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/patents/US7353229</a> . To my untrained eye it looks like this is a patent for the idea of using mechanisms already in JavaScript and Java applets to present advertising. Reading the article as a programmer I didn't see much in the way of how to do popups other than "Use the tools that are already provided."  <br />
<br />
JavaScript and the ability to do pupups and popunders was released by Netscape in 1997.  I am sure that by the time the '229 patent was filed there were a lot of tutorials that explained how to do pupup and popnder ads and did it better than this paptent.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>