<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c632</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:17:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c632</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I am desensitized to it, having been attacked viciously over and over again by the folks on TD who can't stand it when their leader is challenged"<br />
<br />
Well yeah, I mean if I went to the West Boro Baptist church blog and made constant remarks about their Pasture instead of debating their perceptions of reality, I would expect the same kind of treatment.<br />
<br />
You're a big boy Joe, you should know that debating on a website that stands on the other side of the spectrum compared to your viewpoint is going to be difficult. Otherwise, why go through the trouble?<br />
<br />
"Address the merits of my post if you would: Do you agree that Mike has not even begun to back up his assertion that this is a "ridiculous letter with little basis in fact"? "<br />
<br />
Yes, but then there's little information to go on to say how this will affect international copyright in the long run. You can make the assumption it will damage the finances of all the companies Business Europe represents, or you can assume it will barely affect them.<br />
<br />
" Do you agree that Mike hasn't shown us the text of the proposal and explained why this response is bullshit?"<br />
<br />
He hasn't taken the time to dissect it yet, yes, but the focus of this article isn't that specific document, it's the letter that Business Europe sent out concerning the draft treaty.<br />
<br />
"Do you agree that Mike's purpose in writing this article was not to actually advance the debate in a positive way but was instead solely for the purpose of discrediting these people with his usual "they hate the blind!" trope?"<br />
<br />
Mike may interpret that these companies hate blind people, but that's absolutely an opinion, which makes this article an "opinion piece." If you are unable to distinguish opinion from reality, then I don't know what I can do for you.  <br />
<br />
"I feel like I added to the discussion by pointing out how Mike added nothing."<br />
<br />
You also made a bunch of accusations and insults...I don't see how that is at all conducive to any kind of discussion. If you really wanted to add to things, you could read the draft treaty here - <a href='https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=6&amp;ved=0CGEQFjAF&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wipo.int%2Fedocs%2Fmdocs%2Fcopyright%2Fen%2Fsccr_25%2Fsccr_25_2_rev.doc&amp;ei=8FWaUeqlKKrJygGh9YDADg&amp;usg=AFQjCNFH5LfVxJf7y4tRkDYCi89jt_EdnQ&amp;sig2=oIkruGn4R5ZQQ1eUBHswuA&amp;bvm=bv.46751780,d.aWc' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=6&amp;ved=0CGEQFjAF&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wipo.int%2Fedocs%2Fmdocs%2Fcopyright%2Fen%2Fsccr_25%2Fsccr_25_2_rev.doc&amp;ei=8FWaUeqlKKrJygGh9YDADg&amp;usg=AFQjCNFH5LfVxJf7y4tRkDYCi89jt_EdnQ&amp;sig2=oIkruGn4R5ZQQ1eUBHswuA&amp;bvm=bv.46751780,d.aWc</a> - and see if it actually woudl cause a disruption in the international copyright structure. <br />
<br />
"I'm not familiar enough with the proposals to add much of value on the merits, but apparently neither is Mike. That doesn't stop him from writing this crap though. Why aren't you grilling him if you agree with me in part?"<br />
<br />
I don't grill Mike because his opinions don't matter that much to me (I like his ideas though). I come to Techdirt for the information (I mentioned before I usually click the links to see for myself what they say).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c607</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh in CharlotteNC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:16:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c607</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> Let's see the proposal. Let's see the exact text they are taking issue with. Let's discuss it on the merits. </i><br />
<br />
Never thought I'd see you say that.  It's pretty much a staple complaint on Techdirt that the public never gets to see the text of the various treaties and international agreements.<br />
<br />
So Joe, here's a question.  Are you agreeing with Techdirt and most of its readers and commenters that these agreements should be open and transparent to the public?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Interpretation</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c229</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeCool]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:15:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c229</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you (interrogators) think an audio recording might be misinterpreted, perhaps you need video to go with it. If you think the video might be misinterpreted, perhaps it's YOU that is the problem, not the recordings.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c63</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:14:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c63</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hmm... I think Iran, North Korea, and other anti-America countries have a new way to hurt the US.<br />
<br />
The US owned .com domain has aided and abetted MUCH worse and much more numerable crimes! Including<br />
<br />
-Hosting child porn<br />
-Hosting illegal files for download like music and videos<br />
-Hosting porn in general<br />
-Hosting websites that tell people how to do dangerous things, such as build an atomic bomb, cover your tracks after you commit a serious crime like murder<br />
<br />
Imagine all the economic damage if .com starts arbitrarily dumping large numbers of websites to avoid legal liability from all that stuff!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c214</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shon Gale]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:14:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c214</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Who ever said you could TRUST POLICE! They lie for a living, right along with Lawyers and Politicians. Never trust any of them, they will lie to you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>hangouts works on tmobilr</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130516/10513523106/att-continues-to-mock-concept-net-neutrality-this-time-with-google-hangouts-block.shtml#c445</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:13:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130516/10513523106/att-continues-to-mock-concept-net-neutrality-this-time-with-google-hangouts-block.shtml#c445</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hmm... interesting. I have att and my wife has tmobile. She has a gs3 I have a gs4. I can use hangouts on wifi while she can video call on cellular. When we use tango we both can use cellular to make a video call no problem. Its so ridiculousthat you pay for service and can't use it the way you want.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Once again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/03220823047.shtml#c1257</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:12:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/03220823047.shtml#c1257</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, umm... Tell that to Brian May, astrophysicist, rock star. Oh, you can call him doctor, by the way.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>The very silly nudity taboo</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3786</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uriel-238]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:07:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3786</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Crap. This is what I get for not editing my words. As I was saying (regarding dress codes, nudity, indecency, etc.):<br />
<br />
But in some cultures, public nudity is the norm, so the general moral standard regarding decency isn't universal. Indecency laws are one of the few statutes that are based <b>solely</b> on common practice and not on pragmatic purpose. Those that oppose restrictions on public nudity note that it's more natural to not wear clothing than to adorn one's self with artificial skins (so the debate comes down to an appeal to convention vs. an appeal to nature <i>and</i> the public's interest in retaining personal liberty). Now, as it is, the decency laws as they are here in the industrialized world aren't <i>that</i> much of an inconvenience, so the society isn't collapsing under the contention, but this violation of personal liberty might serve as a precedent to violate further personal liberty with later laws, and there's no real good reason why we refuse to let people run around naked....<br />
<br />
I opine that we'd be much better off as a society if we didn't freak out over other people's genitals, and a clothes-optional society would be a significant step in that direction.<br />
<br />
Sorry, all, for writing before my first cup of coffee.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Up next</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c38</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:05:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c38</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Prosecution of the registrar of .com domains over Megaupload]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Witch Hunters</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c191</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:02:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c191</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>simply questioning the transcript opens the questioner up for charges of "making false statements."</blockquote><br />
That is a nice offence, you are guilty of you agree with our version, and guilty if you don't.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>EA </title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c482</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AbbaDabba]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:01:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c482</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[never again, EA... never again will you get a penny from me.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c169</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Millais]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:58:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c169</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm just commenting in order to be the first person to spell Silverglate correctly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c584</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:57:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c584</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're projecting your disgruntled eighth grade writing on others, now.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>well golly gee</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c144</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AbbaDabba]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:57:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c144</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Isn't this EXACTLY why you don't answer questions without your lawyer being present? Seems to me that would put an advocate for the questionee as a witness.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c583</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:56:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c583</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You have an awfully big imaginary pedestal there.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: No interviews</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c137</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:54:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c137</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Don't talk to police without a [good] lawyer.<br />
<br />
Legal scholars continued to be baffled by the sheer number of people who willingly implicate themselves.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c578</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:48:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c578</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Point out by quoting where the letter identifies a single specific problem with the proposals. It does not mention any proposal in the treaty, but just attacks it, rather like you attack Mike.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Miranda??</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c136</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RyanNerd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:48:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c136</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You have the right to remain silent. Anything you do or say may falsified, editorialized, or misinterpreted.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Simple Answer</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c134</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:44:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c134</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is one of the best videos I've ever seen.<br />
<br />
Never say a word to any law enforcement official. Ever. It can come back to bite you in ways you could never imagine. You have a right to remain silent. Exercise it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c129</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:44:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c129</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Illinois state had an unusually high number (compared to other states) of people convicted murder later being freed by DNA proving their innocence when the technology was invented and put into common use.<br />
<br />
Know what their state legislature did to rectify the problem? They required ALL police interrogations be recorded, because of how useful of such videos have proven to be at both getting incriminating evidence against the real criminal, and at proving innocence of the falsely accused (including those bullied into false confessions by police).<br />
<br />
The Illinois police even supported the changes, the FBI could learn something from them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>