<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c135</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Howard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:22:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c135</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[read the fuckin' article you chump]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c114</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:22:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c114</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is patent trolling at its finest, not even thinly veiled:<br />
<blockquote><em>I have this patent, see, and you infringe on it. It would be a shame if I had to go to court with you over it... why don't you just cooperate with me?</em></blockquote>Where, with most patent trolls, "cooperate" means "fork over some money", in this case it means... fork over some money.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c104</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:20:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c104</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Kim Dotcom Threatens To Sue Google, Facebook And Twitter Over 2-Factor Authentication Patent If They Don't Help Him"<br />
<br />
Dumbass.<br />
<br />
That is all.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;reasonably monetize what might be considered infringement under the law&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c303</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:20:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c303</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[OOOH, what a GREAT euphemism for "steal"! Props where due: ALL HAIL PIRATE MIKE!<br />
<br />
Anyhoo, this is LICENSING: "They're basically <b>licensing</b> the copyrights from certain popular works". -- SO LICENSING WORKS, OKAY? Due props plus some cash thrown their way are about all most creators ask.<br />
<br />
Just stick to traditional copyright, kids: it's proven for more than a hundred years to work. -- And on the other side, DON'T STEAL, that's been proven wrong for millenia.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c85</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:20:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c85</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>If this was any one else except the sainted Kim Dotcom, you would be all over them for being weasels and patent trolls. <br />
<br />
Is that it?</i><br />
<br />
Understand that not only is Masnick a shameless piracy apologist- he's also Dotcom's own 'mini-me'. You'll see nothing but adulation here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c280</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:18:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c280</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b> the licensor controls the re-use rights.</b><br />
<br />
All that experience, and no clue!<br />
<br />
You don't know the content of the license that Amazon is obtaining.  You also still miss the point that Amazon would hold the rights to these stories, which they could then <b>sell to the licensor</b> to be developed into movies or other shows, etc.<br />
<br />
You seem to be thinking that Amazon's license would be very limited in scope, similar to someone making toys.  I doubt that would be the case, because it would keep them from hitting the financial jackpot.  This process looks more like crowdsourcing future TV scripts to me.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c68</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:14:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c68</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If this was any one else except the sainted Kim Dotcom, you would be all over them for being weasels and patent trolls.  <br />
<br />
Is that it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c64</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:14:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c64</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> Remember, Dotcom has been hit with racketeering claims, and I would think that anything that implies "give me money or I'll sue" isn't the best move for someone already facing racketeering charges.</i><br />
<br />
I'm sure the prosecutor is grateful to Dotcom for his assistance in his own prosecution.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&amp;quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c44</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:11:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c44</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue wrote:<br />
<br />
"If you're against copyright, quit putting your name on posts! You don't own the idea!<br />
02:00:36[c- 1-0]"<br />
<br />
Ownership and attribution are entirely separate concerns. Duh.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Just like a book deal, but worse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c263</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:10:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c263</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree. However, I wouldn't be surprised if the exclusivity was a condition of the licences being granted in the first place (i.e. perhaps the licence was only granted to books exclusively published by Amazon). We can only guess as to the behind the scenes wrangling that was needed to even get this far.<br />
<br />
However, as I've said elsewhere here, the author ultimately has the choice as to whether to accept this deal, upload for free anywhere or to publish a version with the copyrighted references removed, with the many other methods available. While there's still a choice, I don't see why this is too much of a problem. If an author doesn't like the deal, they don't have to take it - they just won't be able to legally monetise the work they based on copyrighted material while it still references that material.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c39</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:07:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c39</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You believe Kim Dotcom stole the servers he let people use?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c243</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:06:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c243</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["It's not one bit different. But because it's a tech company Masnick thinks it's cool."<br />
<br />
No, boy.<br />
Because it's a case of a copyright owner figuring out a way for both it and the fans (who wouldn't make a cent otherwise) to monitize their work, Masnick thinks it's cool.<br />
And so do I.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's like Tethering all over again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c304</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RyanNerd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:04:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c304</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is one of the best analogies I've ever read.<br />
You are my new hero.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Another monopoly?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c239</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:03:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c239</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That makes perfect sense. Once Amazon is spending money to develop this business, they will protect it. Amazon will probably lead the charge when the issue of licensing characters/settings of derivative works goes to court or a law is proposed.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c26</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:00:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c26</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[But what he ACTUALLY does is steal the income stream from the work of others, and funnel it into his OWN pocket. Geez, that's just sickening coming from a grifting millionaire.<br />
<br />
But I hope Dotcom does sue over this alleged patent! What a bunch of tangles for Mike! He'd have to choose between Dotcom and Google, and whether Dotcom is just a patent troll! And this is VERY MUCH like extortion.<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>Take a loopy tour of <b>Techdirt.com!</b> You always end up same place!</i><br />
<a href='http://techdirt.com/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/</a><br />
<i>If you're against copyright, quit putting your name on posts! You don't own the idea!</i><br />
<i>02:00:36[c-  1-0]</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c224</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:00:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c224</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["The licensors (tv/movie studios) control the rights, so even if one of these fanfic stories prove good enough to adapt into an episode or film, the studio, not Amazon makes the money on it."<br />
<br />
"Incorrect. Amazon would hold the rights to the story, and they could then license it to the studio for development. There is nothing that says Amazon would be the ones making movies or whatnot. Why think so narrowly?"<br />
<br />
Because I've worked on licensed products since 1981?<br />
Written, illustrated, and occasionaly edited for several comic book companies on licensed series (including Star Trek, X-Files, Jurassic Park, and GhostBusters), the terms are usually that the publisher has to have approval from the licensor on story (and art) content (I could tell you horror stories on that score) and that the licensor has control over reprinting and ancillary rights (including use in other media)<br />
That's why, for example, Dark Horse was able to reprint Marvel's Star Wars comics, since LucasFilm, not Marvel, controlled the rights.<br />
Theoretically, the licensors could, once the contract with Amazon expires, move the project to Barnes &amp; Noble.<br />
Either way, the licensor controls the re-use rights.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Just like a book deal, but worse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c220</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:00:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c220</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Moreover, and perhaps more worrisome, I can easily see the 'the only fair use is paid use' lot using this to attack derivative works where the character's/settings aren't licensed, by insisting that now a system is in place where you can pay to use the characters and settings in a derivative work, that means you have to do so, otherwise you're 'stealing from the original writer(s)'.</i><br />
<br />
I think you are off with your concern of 'the only fair use is paid use'. But, I think where people seek to monetize derivative works (in any manner); that this will be cited.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Necessity is the mother of invention</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c184</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Muir]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:59:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c184</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Airport police are using Segways.  They find them better than bikes or carts or motor scooters.  But sure, not as indispensable or necessary as food and water.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c794</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:54:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c794</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because one is still the most guilty, the rest are more aiding and abetting, albeit to different degrees. But yes, the same felony associations that get used on normal people should be applied here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c202</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:54:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c202</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>How is this different to traditional publishers?</i><br />
<br />
It's not one bit different. But because it's a tech company Masnick thinks it's cool.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>