<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c75</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c75</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[To be fair, if Taco Bell is anything like McDonalds, I probably would as it is such a rare occurrence.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c51</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c51</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA['I'm sure these were all just more "accidents"'<br />
<br />
you've got to be freakin' kiddin me! there is about as much chance of that as of me being a spaceman!! it was done on purpose. it will be done again on purpose for this or maybe other films as well. it's done because they can. it's done because there is no punishment. it's done to try to suppress something they, yet again and as usual, dont like! it's done in particular because it's about TPB!<br />
<br />
as for the twat on post number 1, there is never a take down notice that results in a file sharer (you call a pirate) getting nothing but a slap on the wrist! your paymasters harass as many as possible for as much as possible, even though they lose next to nothing!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Obscenity</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c380</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCX2]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:26:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c380</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not just *who* is looking at it, but *when* they are looking at it, <b>and</b> *where* they looked at it.  "Contemporary community standards".  Who, when, and where are very important for determining a "contemporary community standard".<br />
<br />
Note that the court ruling specifically and explicitly mentions that the city and state (Albany, Georgia).  The Feds will shop around for a community which has a very low standard for "obscene".  They did the same thing to Paul F. Little, aka Max Hardcore.<br />
<br />
Using GA also puts it under Federal jurisdiction, since the data crossed state lines via the Internet access of a web site.<br />
<br />
IMO, "contemporary" should have nothing to do with it, and the "community" in question should be the logical community where such works as this are available/advertised/provided, NOT the physical community where the work was ultimately consumed.  Otherwise you end up in the situation where the literary work in your glove box goes from legal to illegal as you enter the city limits of e.g. Albany, GA.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c603</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:25:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c603</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Are you seriously asking how a registrar could know what the most notorious criminal infringement website is up to after they were told by authorities about it? You're missing the point. This isn't about them knowing about it ahead of time. It's about them being told by authorities what the domain name had been used for and may be used for again and then them refusing to cooperate. You sure you're a lawyer? The TF article explains this.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c422</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:23:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c422</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He is suggesting that "an aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator" is a criminal and thus in terms of investigation it is fair game to pull his records if they have a suspicion.<br />
<br />
When we are talking US intelligence and anti-crime units it is a mess of lawlessness and internal fighting. It has been so, at least since the patriot act. What the AC is doing is just spitting acid (probably LSD) and appealing to the added safety the lawlessness provides...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c598</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:22:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c598</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If they are registering the domain name for the purpose of operating a site that the registar knows is criminal, then yes, the registrar is assisting in criminal acts. They weren't just registering any site. It was the Pirate Bay, a known criminal enterprise.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c39</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RadialSkid]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:22:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c39</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Seriously. Do you jizz in your pants when the guys at Taco Bell get your order right?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1068</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:22:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1068</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm pretty sure he's referring to Business Europe's lack of evidence. <br />
<br />
I mean logic dictates that if you can't backup the claim that this proposal, which is in the draft stages and therefore can still be revised, would cause a shift in the balance of international copyright law then you're full of it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c588</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[btr1701]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:22:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c588</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&gt; So Mike, is it your position that registrars<br />
&gt; should be able to register domain names to<br />
&gt; sites that they know are committing criminal<br />
&gt; acts?<br />
<br />
How does a registrar know what a website is even about? Even if you wanted to burden the registrars with having to review every single web site and act as internet censors, if a site hasn't been registered yet, it's not up and running, so there's nothing for them to look at, genius.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c586</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:21:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c586</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Try and stretch that out into an actual argument if you can.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c579</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:20:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c579</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You aren't adding anything to the discussion and are only proving your own worthlessness. A point was made. Address its merits if you can. (I know you can't.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c21</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:20:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c21</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Highlighting the valid use of a law?  Really?  There is no need to highlight when a law is used properly.  There IS a need to highlight when a law is abused so that we can try and refine and amend it to ensure it does not get abused.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c560</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:19:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c560</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>So Mike, is it your position that registrars should be able to register domain names to sites that they know are committing criminal acts? I'm trying to understand what the problem is here.</i><br />
<br />
Wow. You guys are so sensitive that you had to report this comment? That's just sad. You guys really can't stand it if anyone challenges anything. It's a TERRIBLE environment you produce here. It's really, really, really sad that you act this way.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c9</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:18:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c9</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is a text book example of why penalties are needed for DMCA abuse.<br />
<br />
This is not about protecting creators, it is about censoring a legitimate film that shows a different side to TPB (one contrary to the MAFIAA view) and there is absolutely nothing accidental about this one.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Yet again, Mike can't find a lower bound.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c378</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCX2]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:17:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c378</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[*eyeroll*<br />
<br />
Collapsing flagged comments is not censorship.  The comment is still there.  You know it's still there.  This is no more censorship than putting the playboys behind the counter.<br />
<br />
FWIW, I *like* collapsing flagged comments and I wish you could collapse the thread from the flag on down.  Too many times the troll rolls in and everyone pounces and it's entirely unrelated to the damn article.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c5</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:17:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c5</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why don't you ever mention the millions and millions of valid takedown notices that reflect a pirate getting nothing but a slap on the wrist. If you really think piracy is not OK, the vast number of legitimate notices should interest you. Yet, you only hyper-focus on the outliers. What's the matter with a little perspective on things, Mike? Not your style, I'm afraid. Keep up the great work spreading idiotic FUD to the masses. You're really good at it. Whatever you do, don't have honest discussions about things that really matter. Just spread hate. Good on ya!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c398</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:15:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c398</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So you think that the Government is doing the right thing here?<br />
<br />
Frankly I don't care what news organization is in the Governments sights.  This has a chilling effect and should not go unchallenged.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1044</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:15:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1044</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mike claims that it's not true that "this treaty for the blind would be 'casting aside' the international copyright infrastructure.'" He hasn't backed that up. It's a faith-based assertion. Mike claims that the proposal merely "provide extremely limited situations in which copyright restrictions would be limited for the sake of making it easier for vision-impaired people to access works." He hasn't backed that up. It's a faith-based assertion.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: So, anyone who still believes that &quot;1984&quot; is fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c383</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:12:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c383</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was right there with ya until you lost your mind in the last sentence.  <br />
<br />
&gt;.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c376</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:09:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c376</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[By investigating?<br />
<br />
Otherwise, innocent until proven guilty.  We should never make assumptions of wrong doing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>