<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Well...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c155</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PRMan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:54:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c155</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maybe Europe can finally show America what "government of the people, by the people and for the people" really means.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c894</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torg]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:53:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c894</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Having children in the context of machines would be manufacturing new machines rather than carrying a machine to term via pregnancy, and machines can already manufacture new machines, so that one's out.<br />
<br />
Feeling empathy, writing books, imagining, admiring art, feeling regret or any other human emotion, and various patterns of thought are things we don't know how to make machines do yet. The fact that humans can do those things shows that it's possible for things to do those things, therefore it's possible in principle for us to design things that can do those things. We just need to figure out how.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Techdirt continually mistakes &quot;loss leader&quot; with &quot;FREE&quot;.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c174</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:52:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c174</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Little boy blue can't make two points without contradicting himself, doesn't understand what "monthly average revenue for the game has more than doubled" means.  The news at 11.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>It's not some grand experiment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c163</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MissingFrame]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:51:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c163</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[F2P isn't new with MMO games and EA is hardly some frontrunner here. So woohoo the slimeballs at EA finally moved into the 21st century.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c154</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:51:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c154</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just as an aside, there are some things I'd like to point out:<br />
<br />
1) AC above has it right; this doesn't mean EA has learned anything. <br />
<br />
2) I think most publishers understand that free *can* work - it is just that many times they either a) aren't certain that it *will* work or b) believe they can make more money with a pay-to-play model. In this case, EA probably knew beforehand that a free to play model would have more accounts, but that wasn't what they were interested in. <br />
<br />
 What they wanted was to replicate the success of WoW, which made money hand over fist. The goal was to attract a paying subscriber base, which would have significantly more revenue per account than a free-to-play/advertising based model. Now, with that said WoW still made more money than any video game ever. The question EA asked (and we should be asking) is this: would WoW have made more money for Blizzard free-to-play or subscription based? <br />
<br />
For their part, Blizzard firmly believes that they would have made less money without paid subscriptions. Free can work, but so can paid. <br />
<br />
EA's goal was that high-profit setup. They failed in that aim, and the adjustment is just moving from an unsuccessful fee model to a relatively more successful advertising one.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c21</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[fogbugzd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:49:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c21</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The backlash is more likely to "cast aside" copyright than almost anything else they could do.  On second thought, perhaps we should be encouraging the trade groups.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c152</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:49:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c152</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Crazy part?  They made money going free even though the way they implemented free to play was <a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/report/article/the-old-republics-free-to-play-option-isnt-worth-your-time-let-alone-money" rel="nofollow">pretty shitty.</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/15163123086/did-paul-duffys-wife-admit-that-duffy-was-engaged-interstate-extortion-facebook.shtml#c870</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord Binky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:48:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/15163123086/did-paul-duffys-wife-admit-that-duffy-was-engaged-interstate-extortion-facebook.shtml#c870</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The mental flexibility required to twist extorting people for associating their name with porn into preventing minors from accessing porn is really quite impressive.<br />
<br />
Especially impressive when you consider that at the same time that she is blindly ignoring the minors she considers as being protected are generally more skilled at aquiring porn than the adults they extorting.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Techdirt continually mistakes &quot;loss leader&quot; with &quot;FREE&quot;.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c142</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:44:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c142</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This isn't an advertising supported FREE, presumably has some benefits for paying.<br />
<br />
Now go over to the dark side, ha, and look at the raw number of freeloaders: 1,700,000 to 500,000, or 3.4 : 1 ratio!<br />
<br />
This is an established franchise with tons of fans (of all ages, some with actual cash!) over more than 3 decades, and STILL can't get over 30 percent paying, 70 percent freeloaders!<br />
<br />
So, NO, still don't see "FREE" working the way you claim.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/05513523093/suburban-express-goes-double-nothing-their-aggressive-behavior.shtml#c126</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord Binky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:41:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/05513523093/suburban-express-goes-double-nothing-their-aggressive-behavior.shtml#c126</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This makes no sense, why would I choose to have shady business practices if it requires me to have as thick a skin as straightforward bad business practices?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c131</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:38:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c131</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Forgive me but the cynic in me says too much interests to side with transparency now... Still I hop I'll bite my tongue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Order 66</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/10535223120/indian-publishing-firm-cant-take-little-criticism-threatens-blogger-with-1-billion-lawsuit-criminal-charges.shtml#c246</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:37:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/10535223120/indian-publishing-firm-cant-take-little-criticism-threatens-blogger-with-1-billion-lawsuit-criminal-charges.shtml#c246</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So if you type your Zip/Post code wrong, or mis-spell a name, you're a criminal? Excellent!<br />
<br />
Now, just look for politicians publishing 'false' information...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eric's comment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c198</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:35:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c198</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If the fact that legal alternatives mattered then terrorists would already be unable to benefit from infringement, at least where legal alternatives are available. Since they do benefit from infringement (according to congress) that means one of two possibilities<br />
<br />
A: the existence of legal alternatives doesn't matter and so you bringing up the difference is irrelevant.<br />
<br />
IOW, the argument that abolishing IP law would stop terrorists from benefiting from infringement still holds. Adding stricter IP enforcement or stricter laws, like with prohibition, would simply reduce competition for the terrorists which make it even more profitable for terrorists to use infringement to support themselves (econ 101, less competition, more profits).<br />
<br />
B: There are situations where legal alternatives are unavailable (ie: Orphaned works) and that's where terrorists are benefiting.<br />
<br />
The solution here is for congress to pass laws ensuring that legal alternatives are always available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pricing</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130218/23563522021/copyright-harlem-shake-selective-enforcement.shtml#c456</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robbie]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:33:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130218/23563522021/copyright-harlem-shake-selective-enforcement.shtml#c456</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The people whom this public message he gave to could not afford to purchase it at any price.<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGQP-vQ_OPg" rel="nofollow">youtube</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08111723117/want-to-destroy-any-hope-serious-cybersecurity-give-doj-its-desired-backdoor-wiretaps-all-communications.shtml#c218</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:31:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08111723117/want-to-destroy-any-hope-serious-cybersecurity-give-doj-its-desired-backdoor-wiretaps-all-communications.shtml#c218</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The implications are rather simple. A backdoor would need some sort of lvl0 security hash or something. Eventually those things will be broken and inevitably before it can be patched when it's broken some ill-willed individuals will use it to take control of the current iteration of the software before the company can hope to patch the hole generating masses of zombie computers.<br />
<br />
Now imagine if those ill-willed people are the Chinese military...<br />
<br />
They should be VERY afraid of giving anyone the key to build a cyber-nuke.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: How is it different?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130509/18162523030/there-is-no-logic-to-argument-that-zach-braff-shouldnt-use-kickstarter.shtml#c2049</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis deems]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:28:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130509/18162523030/there-is-no-logic-to-argument-that-zach-braff-shouldnt-use-kickstarter.shtml#c2049</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If I had a kid the LAST thing I would do is set him loose on YouTube.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1440</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:28:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1440</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wow, who butthurt you enough to want to insult Mike over something that probably 95+% of the population don't know, and possibly half even of the tech-literate population?<br />
<br />
It's a shame because that was otherwise an Insightful, informative answer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eric's comment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c191</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:27:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c191</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're still not following me here. I understand you  are probably on crack like the rest of the shills (and the rest of Hollywood, ie: see all the actors in rehab) but try to follow.<br />
<br />
According to congress terrorist organizations are benefit from infringement.  I already hate IP law and so the takeaway I get is that, like with prohibition, IP law is responsible for them benefiting because without IP law they would be unable to profit from infringement. This just gives me even more reason to hate infringement. <br />
<br />
You state that the difference here is that there are legal alternatives. That statement means absolutely nothing and is irrelevant if terrorists are still benefiting from infringing works because, like with prohibition, if you abolish the restrictions (IP law) terrorists can no longer benefit (because people will just seek legal free alternatives instead of funding terrorists to pay for infringing works). <br />
<br />
If anything, what congress needs to do to completely stop these terrorists from benefiting from infringement is, according to your logic, ensure that legal alternatives are available. It is the unavailability of legal alternatives, according to you, that enable terrorists to benefit from infringement. Otherwise, if they were available terrorists would be unable to benefit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c19</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:27:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c19</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>The level of freakout from these giant companies over helping the blind is really quite incredible.</i><br />
<br />
You wouldn't believe the level of hatred this is generating when people get aware of those actions against the blind. A simple way to nullify these morons is to rise awareness. The backlash will do the rest.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c360</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:24:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c360</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ah Nintendo.. Ironically the ONLY reason I bought their console was because I could easily squeeze shitloads of games in an HDD and play them at will (aka piracy). So far I've found one or two that would really be worthy buying but really... Nintendo. I'll not buy next console though. In fact I think I'm done with locked up consoles and server based DRM.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>