<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Prosecute him for improper DMCA takedown notice!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c147</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chosen Reject]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:49:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c147</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, he should be prosecuted for not having a video taken down.<br />
<br />
Did you seriously get that confused?  Mike writes an article about DMCA notices being used to takedown content they don't own, and you get it confused with a non-DMCA email asking for content to be removed (which didn't get removed by the way).  One abuses the force of law to get someone else's content taken down, the other asks for someone to consider their own hypocrisy.  No law states that DMCA compliant notices are required to take content down.<br />
<br />
Perhaps, blue, you should spend a few more seconds in figuring out what is even going on.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Oh no, don't throw me in the brier patch!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1168</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:43:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1168</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[See my clarification above regarding what would and would not get taken out. <br />
<br />
In short, lawsuit happy groups like *AA's, gone from the net, everyone else, still gets the benefit of the doubt and so stays.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>time marches on</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c134</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheLastCzarnian]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:41:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c134</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hopefully Mark has been informed of his mistake and remedied the situation by sending a proper DMCA to YouTube. Then we can all sit back and watch OOTB's head explode again.<br />
<br />
Oooh! Pretty!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: don't forget</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c515</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:38:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c515</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree on the 'stable' part, but for someone claiming to be utterly broke, the idea of being able to afford a <b>very</b> expensive trip like that does pretty handily disprove the 'I'm broke and have less than a grand in the bank' line he's trying to give the judge.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/18225323199/president-obama-is-troubled-about-chilling-effects-his-own-administration-is-causing-to-journalism.shtml#c771</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rekrul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:38:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/18225323199/president-obama-is-troubled-about-chilling-effects-his-own-administration-is-causing-to-journalism.shtml#c771</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The most troubling part for Obama was probably keeping a straight face during the speech.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: @&quot;the public do not respect copyright.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c127</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chosen Reject]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:38:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c127</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, most of the public doesn't have a clue about copyright law, regularly get it confused with patents and trademarks, and generally think that it deals with attribution.  That's why youtube lyrics videos start off with comments like "I don't own the copyright on this".<br />
<br />
Why?<br />
<br />
Because people think copyright has something to do with attribution.  It doesn't.  Why do they think this?  Because people generally want credit for what they do.  They want validation.  That's innate in human beings.  Wanting money or control over some idea of theirs is not innate.  People simply respect copyright law today not because they get it and understand it and agree with it, but because they think it's something it's not and agree with that other something.  The more I've taught people that what they are doing is infringement, the more I've found people hate copryight law.<br />
<br />
What do you mean I can't copy this song and give it to my friend?  I didn't change the artist?<br />
<br />
What do you mean I can't copy this coloring book for my friends' kids?  They know I didn't make it.<br />
<br />
What do you mean I can't play the music/movie I bought at the block party for my neighborhood?  I just told you I bought it.<br />
<br />
No, the public at large generally hates copyright once they find out the basic things they think should be ok are punishable by up to $150,000.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: @&quot;the public do not respect copyright.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c114</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:36:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c114</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There you go again with mass assumptions that anyone who is anti copyright is a pirate.  I probably spend more on content than you, sonny.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c733</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:35:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c733</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's all the same to me too. It's all rubbish that needs to be thrown out.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: @&quot;the public do not respect copyright.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c101</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheLastCzarnian]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:34:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c101</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm almost 44. Do I get to be one of the "kids" too?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>CLARIFICATION OF POST</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1167</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:31:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1167</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Judging by the number of comments similar to yours, it looks like I should have been clearer. <br />
<br />
Since the reason for the 'shoot first, ask questions later' plan of taking everything down 'just in case would' be to avoid potential lawsuits, it would also only <i>apply to those groups(like the *AA's) that have proven to be lawsuit happy, and <b>not independents.</b></i><br />
<br />
So *AA music/movie trailers/reviews? Gone. <br />
Independent music/movie trailers/review? Still up.<br />
<br />
Sorry for the confusion, should have been more clear I guess.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Egging each other on</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c667</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rekrul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:27:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c667</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>These cops sound like they're egging each other on</b>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: @&quot;the public do not respect copyright.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c88</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Teach]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:26:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c88</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The phrase "common law" has a specific meaning, OOTB2: <a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law</a><br />
<br />
I don't think it means what you vaguely imply that it means. <br />
<br />
Copyright isn't based on precedent, it's statute based. That kind of makes it "not common law".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It doesn't have to be DMCA</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c81</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:25:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c81</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Indeed.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c859</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:23:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c859</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't get it. Earlier you agreed that robots.txt is not a security measure. Now you're saying that Google should help with security related to robots.txt.  It cant be both!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Who's on first?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c113</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lurker Keith]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:23:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c113</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's how this whole mess started getting uncovered: <br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121130/17100821190/copyright-troll-case-tossed-fraud-court-after-abbott-costello-worthy-hearing.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121130/17100821190/copyright-troll-case-tossed-fraud-court-after-abbott-costello-worthy-hearing.shtml</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Law is for Lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c708</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:23:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c708</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[My position is that ideals are great, that occasional mistakes are not inconsistent with having ideals, and that Techdirt writers are once again blowing a tiny event (which they have effectively no insight into and have not investigated in the slightest) into a huge deal to put forth their own agenda...while denying it's about an anti-IP agenda and claiming it's really more about journalistic integrity.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/00583723201/if-you-thought-copyright-was-mess-earth-what-does-it-look-like-space.shtml#c278</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Burkhardt]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:22:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/00583723201/if-you-thought-copyright-was-mess-earth-what-does-it-look-like-space.shtml#c278</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Again, the real issue is reimportation.  We will want to watch the Mars Landing.  But if the astronauts are singing an inspirational tune, or have one playing in the background, the audio track is  in trouble.  And the "company" established to finance the colony mission is likely incorporated in a Bern Convention state, meaning all of your support could come out from under you as the follow up supplies cant be shipped, cause the colony venture was sued for the colonists actions, and now has no money....Until the colony is self sufficient, it cant form a truly independent government, and therefore will be held in some fashion to Earth copyright.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c64</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:22:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c64</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is a decent excuse the first couple times, but now we hear a story of insane takedowns every day. Its clearly being abused and mark my words it will only get worse without a clear penalty being applied to frivolous, incorrect, or bad faith takedowns. <br />
<br />
It has gotten to the point where content owners are basically thinking I don't like what this guy wrote or did *whips out takedown hammer"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: @&quot;the public do not respect copyright.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c57</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:22:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c57</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, a LARGE portion of the public DOES respect copyright because it's based simple and obvious common law: I made it, therefore I own it. Only you kids who want to take and enjoy for free entertainments that you haven't created without giving a little bit of money in exchange show disrepect for common law in your piracy. <br />
<br />
Now, don't argue that you're acting morally by throwing up a bunch of misleading special cases or pointing to corporate fat cats also stealing when you don't accept the simple fundamentals of copyright being common law.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/00583723201/if-you-thought-copyright-was-mess-earth-what-does-it-look-like-space.shtml#c262</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:21:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/00583723201/if-you-thought-copyright-was-mess-earth-what-does-it-look-like-space.shtml#c262</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You do actually. Well not "you" specifically, but the 1967 Outer Space Treaty established all of outer space as an international commons by describing it as the "province of all mankind" and forbidding states from claiming territorial sovereignty. Doesn't say anything about copyright though.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>