<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Reminds me of 1984</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c3144</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:27:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c3144</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Its not a police state, it's called Fascism.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's not all about &quot;working&quot;, but about STATING MORALITY.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c113</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:27:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c113</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, and about dissent.  If you know of any posts on TechDirt that are constructive dissent or a discussion involving differing opinions, please point those posts out.  I don't see any.<br />
<br />
Mike:  How about a new feature?  When a post is reported enough times, hide not only the post, but all of its replies.  (Like this one you are reading now.)  That would make the constructive or even merely funny posts more visible.  It would cut down on the vast amount of non-productive noise.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid. Mike is a hypocrite.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c586</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:23:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c586</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[IIRC, he's one of the people who was whining a couple of years ago on threads about the Huffington Post (the site was sold and people who had willingly donated articles tried demanding a cut despite having posted the articles for nothing). Blue, or people like him, tried defending this claiming that Huffington had somehow exploited the people who willingly gave their content for no promise of anything other than exposure through the site, which they received in full.<br />
<br />
The arguments are not only nonsensical and based on random assumptions, they're not even new.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid. Mike is a hypocrite.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c570</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:23:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c570</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Unpaid? Far from it. Everyday we come to this site so we can feel like <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130529/19425723249/amsterdams-rijksmuseum-does-digital-archives-right-hi-res-downloads-suite-online-editing-tools.shtml#c121" rel="nofollow">this guy</a>:<br />
<br />
<i>"You know, I like you OOTB. I know that others don't but I really do. I know that no matter how many times a day I stick a drill bit up my nose in a day, I can come here, read your comments, and realize that there's somebody stupider than me. For that, OOTB, I thank you."</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: NSA Surveillance</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/10465223506/british-intelligence-spied-g20-officials-phone-calls-emails-during-2009-summit.shtml#c582</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[btrussell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:23:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/10465223506/british-intelligence-spied-g20-officials-phone-calls-emails-during-2009-summit.shtml#c582</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I'm not going anywhere, Mike."<br />
<br />
Where would you go?<br />
<br />
You can't get a job and no school will accept you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c562</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:17:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c562</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, I thought that was fairly accurate. out_of_the_blue won't read the stories elsewhere because then he wouldn't get a kick out of make-believing that he's achieved any moral victories over us lowly paying customers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c89</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:17:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c89</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>1. What problem does this law need to solve?<br />
 2. How is this possibly going to solve it?<br />
 3. Aren't there alternatives that are less likely to cause collateral damage and if not, is solving the problem of #1 worth the damage?</b><br />
<br />
1. Personal privacy<br />
2. By making you ask permission<br />
3. Yes, and no.<br />
<br />
It is very simply, just like there are signs up in supermarkets saying.<br />
<br />
"Entry is an acceptance that you are willing to have your bags searched".<br />
<br />
in this case it would be,<br />
<br />
Entry into this location is permission to take photos.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c544</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:17:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c544</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Judging by his other comments in this thread, I assume he's talking about you guys who write the articles for the site.<br />
<br />
If not, he's actually suggesting that people who write comments on stories should be paid, which is not only rather stupid but has interesting implications for a lot of corporate sites he presumably supports.<br />
<br />
Unless, of course, it's a Freudian slip and he's admitting that he is a paid shill, after all? In which case, as ever, I suggest his employers get saner employees since not a damn word he types is getting people to support his "points" and the lack of real counterpoints only makes the articles here look better.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's not all about &quot;working&quot;, but about STATING MORALITY.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c76</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:16:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c76</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We don't mind dissent.  What we mind is the never ending personal attacks and stream of lies.  At some point, responding is a waste of time.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c543</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:16:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c543</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>Now, as I've said before, I think laws against unpaid internships are kind of silly -- and if people can willingly come to an agreement where an unpaid internship makes sense, it should be allowed.</i></blockquote>I have to disagree with this. Even though most current unpaid internships are illegal, we get massive abuses like this. How bad would it be if they removed those laws?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Yes, it's true about Masnick</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110523/00523214395/dailydirt-inspired-nature.shtml#c299</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[btrussell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:15:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110523/00523214395/dailydirt-inspired-nature.shtml#c299</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["(all of my comments are being held for moderation... aka, held for deletion)."<br />
<br />
Where should we go to read this comment then?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Yes, it's true about Masnick</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110523/00523214395/dailydirt-inspired-nature.shtml#c297</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[btrussell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:14:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110523/00523214395/dailydirt-inspired-nature.shtml#c297</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is just a place where people are given enough rope to hang themselves with their idiotic postings.<br />
<br />
I hope you know a good lawyer as you are treading dangerously close to territory where you will soon need one.<br />
<br />
P.S. Did you drop out of school? You have more time to post than anyone else here. Or is this the new job?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wouldn't it be simpler . . .</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c51</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:14:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c51</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It seems like it was be easier to just make photography illegal in private, public and on days ending in 'Y'.  This would apply to both still and motion photography.  The government would be excluded from this restriction of course.  To ensure compliance, video cameras could be installed into every home, and other private or public building.<br />
<br />
I think this would make everyone happy.<br />
<br />
NSA:  Yes, we need this for national security, as well as the entertainment of our analysts.<br />
<br />
RIAA:  Yes, this would get rid of all those piracy enabling cell phones, tablets, laptops and many desktop computers.<br />
<br />
ISPs:  Yes, we would no longer need to invest in our infrastructure as all video traffic (and even still pictures) on the Internet would cease.  People would stop complaining and start thinking internet speeds are fantastic, since all web pages would contain only text.<br />
<br />
MPAA:  Wait, a minute guys . . . Oh, wait.  Nevermind, this would work for us!  We would make all TV and movie content consist of reality programming based on all of the exempted state cameras in private places!  Then we would need a law propping up the broadcast TV and cable industries.  Maybe even a requirement for people to watch some minimum number of hours per day?  It would be good for the economy.<br />
<br />
Legislators:  See everyone is happy.  The little people should stop complaining and leave the business of governing to those who the <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/lawrence_lessig_we_the_people_and_the_republic_we_must_reclaim.html" rel="nofollow">Lesters</a> selected to run things.  Legislators know how to make everyone's life better through more government.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid. Mike is a hypocrite.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c534</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greevar]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:12:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c534</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's a load of horse honky. His "unpaid minions" are volunteers that know going in that they are donating their time. Mike offers no compensation and they ask for none. They aren't being mislead, coerced, or cheated. They participate of their own free will. Your argument is about as flat as Calista Flockhart's chest.<br />
<br />
You are pathetic. You can't refute the arguments so, instead, you turn to personal attacks, ad hominems, and trying to kill the messenger to stop the message. Yeah, your content is compelling as eating raw tripe with live insects.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/12373623425/mpaas-chris-dodd-will-be-chair-free-speech-week.shtml#c1638</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pragmatic]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:11:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/12373623425/mpaas-chris-dodd-will-be-chair-free-speech-week.shtml#c1638</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's what happens when "debate" means "agree with," as it does for the likes of A.J.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Some questions that I hope the lawmakers have already considered</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c46</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johann Schwarz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:08:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c46</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good that Sweden is taking privacy protection so seriously, but I have three questions:<br />
 1. What problem does this law need to solve?<br />
 2. How is this possibly going to solve it?<br />
 3. Aren't there alternatives that are less likely to cause collateral damage and if not, is solving the problem of #1 worth the damage?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: &amp;quot;laws against unpaid internships are kind of silly&amp;quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c512</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:08:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c512</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It must be a scary world you live in, to have such delusions and lack of logical consistency fighting for domination over your tiny mind.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>It's not all about &quot;working&quot;, but about STATING MORALITY.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c39</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:08:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c39</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Law is (also) for teaching purposes, and you young ankle-biters who even haven't learned toleration for dissent in comments here, clearly don't understand that though laws may be somewhat impractical to apply, <b>it's statement by adult society of what behavior is acceptable.</b>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c3133</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pragmatic]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:07:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c3133</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He's a right-wing authoritarian conspiracy theorist who subscribes to Dominionism, if memory serves. It's a massive case of the pot calling the kettle black.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Your $25 contribution will feed 100 starving artists for a month</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c499</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:06:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c499</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[These assholes are all so transparent. They claim to stand for the little guy, saying artists need to eat while cheating them out of their royalties or, as with these interns, literally paying them a starving wage.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>