<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: &quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c445</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:51:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c445</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I dunno... Maybe they're just paying the dancing monkey so that they can laugh at him along with the rest of us. I hope it is that, I'd hate to think I've been laughing at an actual mental patient all this time.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c387</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:50:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c387</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> it's simply lame, derivative, over-blown, over-contrived, self-aggrandizing, unrealistic crap such as Timothy Geigner, aka Dark Helmet, strains to write</i><br />
<br />
That is uncalled for. I mean, Tim is to literature what Marcus Carab is to music.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c439</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:48:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c439</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Correct. Prior art on this exists for a very long time.<br />
<br />
For example, to launch a nuclear weapon you (allegedly) have to use two keys - that are given to two different people - simultaneously, and the mechanism is designed so that one person cannot engage the mechanism on his own.<br />
<br />
It's not quite authentication. It's more of a two-factor failsafe mechanism: no one person can fire a nuclear weapon. But the principle is the same.<br />
<br />
In any event. such a thing has existed for decades. Unsurprisingly, some douchebag managed to get a patent on this...presumably because he put "on the internet" on the patent application.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c438</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:48:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c438</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Your usual bullshit. Incredible. Yet, not. Because it's average_joe (yep, the moron with the stolen avatar).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c413</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:47:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c413</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[FSM knows they could use all the help they can get, given they've been failing pretty spectacularly handling it on their own.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c393</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:47:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c393</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Why go so soft on Kim?</i><br />
<br />
Because Mike worships all pirates. The bigger the better.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c373</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:46:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c373</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>To me, it implies that it's OK for these companies to capitulate to a patent troll because the ends justify the means.</i><br />
<br />
Yep. But mostly it's because it's his pirate ally Kim D doing the trolling.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c371</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeissmann]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:44:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c371</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, from what I understood, Dotcom doesn't plan to sue them in any case. His idea is rather to license the patent to someone (probably some patent troll) and let them deal with it, while he gets his license fees straight away.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c369</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis deems]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:44:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c369</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's not just you.  The title is very awkward.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c365</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:42:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c365</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>If this was any one else except the sainted Kim Dotcom, you would be all over them for being weasels and patent trolls.<br />
<br />
Is that it?</i><br />
<br />
Bingo. The *only* problem Mike perceives here is that this might hurt Dotcom in his upcoming legal case. The patent trolling itself is not a problem, and in fact, he thinks it's a good idea that these companies capitulate to his ultimatum. Incredible. Yet, not. Because it's Mike.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c343</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:40:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c343</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just to add a bit more, the book describes why people use cryptography.  One of the uses is to ensure privacy from government intrusion.  The author even describes that one day this may be necessary even for citizens in the United States.<br />
<br />
It's been a long, looooong time since I read the book, but I seem to recall it is on about page 100 (maybe 99, or 101), and it is long before September 11, 2001.<br />
<br />
He describes that if there were a terrorist attack on the US, perhaps an large attack on, say, New York, that liberties and privacy may be curtailed severely.<br />
<br />
Wow.  He was quite insightful.<br />
<br />
Like I said, it is an outstanding book.  Also large, thick and heavy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c328</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:39:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c328</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>Do you have a problem with any of the points in the article, or are you just the latest in a long line of people to whine whenever Mike doesn't write what you want him to like?</b><br />
<br />
Yup, I have a problem with this.  This article makes patent trolling sound like a wonderful and acceptable way to do things, as long as it's someone on the "good guys for piracy" list.  If anyone else was doing this (and I mean anyone not in the anti-copyright anti-patent side of things) the article would be a huge swipe at the nasty patent trolls who were abusing the system for profit and trying to scam money. I am sure there would be some insinuations of forum shopping and perhaps a sideways joke about it being an "East Texas patent" or something like that.<br />
<br />
Eliminate Kim from the discussion, and this would be a standard patent troll story with angry assumptions.  Why go so soft on Kim?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Just like a book deal, but worse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c357</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:37:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c357</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wish I was actually, I've seen several comments and even an article on this site where that idea is brought up, that unless money is changing hands fair use doesn't exist. <br />
<br />
The fact that fair use doesn't even remotely require payment, and in fact is directly contradictory of the idea behind fair use, is apparently beyond those that make that argument, but that doesn't stop them from doing so.<br />
<br />
Probably the most obvious claim  of 'no fair use that isn't paid use':<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130110/01515121624/lionsgate-censors-remix-video-that-copyright-office-itself-used-as-example-fair-use.shtml#comments' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130110/01515121624/lionsgate-censors-remix-video-that-copyright-office-itself-used-as-example-fair-use.shtml#comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c308</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:36:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c308</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Regardless of the patent B.S. these companies should help in his defense.  Don't be a dolt!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c283</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:35:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c283</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The book Applied Cryptography, an extensive work on the subject describes multiple-factor authentication.<br />
<br />
The book describes that at the most basic level, you can prove your identity three ways:<br />
1. Something you know (eg, password, PIN, etc)<br />
2. Something you have (eg, building key, electronic fob, etc)<br />
3. Something you are (eg, retina scan, fingerprint, voiceprint, etc)<br />
<br />
Banks have used two factor authentication for years.  An ATM wants something you Know (PIN) and something you have (plastic card).<br />
<br />
The military often uses something you Are and something you Know.  The guard must personally recognize you and you better know the password of the day.  Failure may result in getting shot -- especially around nukes.<br />
<br />
Google uses something you Know (password) and something you have (your mobile phone with a pre arranged app).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>BBM</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c311</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greggore]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:35:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c311</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Using BBM is not blocked by AT&amp;T. Full video chat and conferencing included. <br />
<br />
Monopolies are never good for anyone.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c263</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:34:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c263</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You have to consider all the pressure this must be putting on him.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c255</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:34:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c255</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think it's a desperation attempt by him because his funds have been wrongfully frozen. Now he's not thinking very clearly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c249</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:33:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c249</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Of course he's a patent troll (or acting like one in this case at least). Nothing in the article denies that.<br />
<br />
"Is that it?"<br />
<br />
Yes, apparently Mike has to use very specific language in his articles, else morons will come and attack him. Do you have a problem with any of the points in the article, or are you just the latest in a long line of people to whine whenever Mike doesn't write what you want him to like? You certainly seem to be using the same tactics as the other idiots rather than address anything actually said. "Not a regular commenter" my ass.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: &amp;amp;quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&amp;amp;quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c236</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:33:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c236</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Ownership and attribution are entirely separate concerns. Duh."<br />
<br />
Right, and even if you don't put your name in it, you can still claim the copyright later if you can prove that you did it.<br />
<br />
Try again, blue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>