<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c117</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:49:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c117</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Do the sanctions start at $7,000 or $14,000 today?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Why am I not surprised?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c288</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[bratwurzt]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:48:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c288</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It seems you're writing this on his blog. Where he can write anything. Y U so jealous?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c93</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:45:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c93</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Settlements reached or someone dug up dirt and threatened to publicly shame. Prenda tends to reach settlements through threats. These cases suddenly disappearing is strange enough to inspire curiosity rather than closure.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c407</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:26:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c407</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>At their core, these services are merely allowing people to do things they always do with friends and acquaintances (giving lifts, letting them stay in your apartment) with strangers. Unless there's any actual proven damage, I can't see the problem.</b><br />
<br />
Fundamentally, it's the same reason why few people (if any) would be prosecuted for banging out a copy of a CD for a friend, but like Tenenbaum and Thomas have shown, you can get in trouble for doing it for your "internet friends you don't know".  Scale is a really big issue here.<br />
<br />
Lending your sofa to a friend is pretty normal.  Lending your sofa to a stranger is pretty odd, but not off the scale.  Charging for it, and actively recruiting strangers to pay for the sofa takes it to a different level.<br />
<br />
There is a pretty hard and fixed line in the legal sand regarding hotels versus rental units.  There is the very basic question of fitness for use, zoning, and all that.  A really key issue is liability insurance, a home owners policy might not extend to cover paid guests.  Many people living in flats don't even have any of that type of insurance at all.  So if someone got injured during a short term rental, who would cover the costs?<br />
<br />
The split is key here.  When you rent a flat long term, you accept to cover your own liability and legally, the landlord is not liable for hazards that you create yourself, and only needs coverage for the building itself. <br />
<br />
It's pretty much a black letter law issue.   It would only take a couple of people getting seriously hurt and suing or for that matter a couple of renters getting attacked by their "internet friends" to turn this business model sour, leaving the city and state perhaps having to pay the resolve the issue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Prenda Gets Some Tiny Bit Of Goo...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c80</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nom du Clavier]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:24:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c80</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Or so my tab in Firefox reads... Presently I wish unto them copious amounts of goo, so alas, I have been foiled!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Setting the bar low enough to walk over</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c68</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Burkhardt]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:02:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c68</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[On the other hand, this might adversely affect final judgement.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Yes.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1740</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:53:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1740</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey, AJ, I thought you left.<br />
<br />
Anyway, you're missing the point (big surprise) again (shocker, I know)<br />
<br />
Those examples that you listed with the car, knife and gun...<br />
<br />
Speeding puts people's lives in danger.  Knifing someone takes away a person's life.  Shooting a gun can kill or injure people, which interferes with their rights to live.<br />
<br />
Now then...<br />
<br />
How does unlocking my electronics take away a person's rights like those do?<br />
<br />
All unlocking does is, instead of taking away rights, GIVES people the right to use their stuff as they see fit so long as what they're doing doesn't interfere with another person's rights.<br />
<br />
Throwing bricks, stabbing someone, speeding, shooting, all of those endanger human lives.<br />
<br />
Unlocking a phone or video game system doesn't hurt ANYBODY!!!<br />
<br />
You seem to fail to grasp this basic concept, AJ.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Not acceptable</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c714</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reality Check]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:45:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c714</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually enforcing a trademark is NOTHING like harassing a fan.  NOTHING.  <br />
<br />
Enforcing a trademark is preventing others from labeling their chocolate hazelnut spread with a logo and/or name that looks like yours, so that an 'idiot in a hurry' would mistakenly buy their product thinking it was yours.<br />
<br />
Enforcing a trademark is completely unrelated to harassing people who use your trademark to refer to YOUR product.  <br />
<br />
That's the key, this person was actually referring to <b>Nutella</b>.  So, no trademark infringement, just common everyday IP bullying and lunacy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Take action, vote for Basic Income</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c950</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:43:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c950</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't see the robot future bleak. But I want a piece of the pie of the productivity gain.<br />
<br />
That's what these people promote too: Basic Income. <a href="http://www.basicincome.org/bien/aboutbasicincome.html" rel="nofollow">www.basicincome.org/bien/aboutbasicincome.html</a><br />
<br />
And if you're in Europe, please sign the petition: <a href="http://sign.basicincome2013.eu" rel="nofollow">sign.basicincome2013.eu</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Geez, Mike, you just confirmed the accusation.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c390</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:41:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c390</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Even opinions can be based upon fact and empirical evidence.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: TIL...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c696</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:30:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c696</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Over here in the UK, we've got a franchise called Shakeaway that does blended milkshakes with various ingredients. Refreshers, Snickers, Oreos, you name it.<br />
<br />
Having one with peanut butter and Nutella is especially nice. I recommend it (although PB/Nutella sandwich goes well too).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c950</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:26:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c950</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why do you people always have to lie in order to make your pathetic "points"?<br />
<br />
Here, for example, the domain in question was registered in 2007. At that time, nobody had been found guilty of any crime.<br />
<br />
Once again, stop lying out of your ass every time you say something, and you might get somewhere.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c928</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:21:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c928</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[To be fair, that's a subdomain of go.com - the TLD registrar has nothing to do with it.<br />
<br />
But, there's plenty of problems raised by the hard of thinking above - if I for example register piratemovies.com, am I setting up a source for pirated movies, or a perfectly legal fan site or merchandising site for the Pirates Of The Caribbean movies? Nobody knows until the site is built, and that's got nothing to do with registrars.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yes.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1730</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:19:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1730</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>It's a pretty simple question: do you actually own the products you buy?</b><br />
<br />
yes, but that does not mean you are able to use what you own how you like.<br />
<br />
You can own many things and still have restrictions on it's use, you can own a car, but it's illegal to speed on public roads, you can own a knife but you cannot kill someone with it, or use it to conduct a crime.<br />
<br />
You (in America) can own a gun, but you cannot just take it where you like or discharge it when you like, (or kill someone with it).<br />
<br />
So Masnick, it's quite simple yes, you can own many things, you can even own copies of works and not own the copyright!!.<br />
<br />
This is pretty basic stuff mansick, why do you have so much trouble understanding it ?????????]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c620</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:19:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c620</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&gt; "When was the last time that you beat your wife?"<br />
<br />
I beat her all the time. With Chess.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: I bring popcorn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c626</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:19:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c626</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This has got to be THE lamest cliche comment in the history of the internet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1075</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:15:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1075</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[minor quibble- Tasers are like any weapon in that misuse can cause them to be lethal. They are called Less-lethal ( not less-than-lethal) because when used as you are supposed to use them, then they are not lethal, except in certain ( rare) circumstances. Tasering someone until they stop breathing is misuse of the Taser, same as using a gun to shoot up a bunch of people is misuse of a gun. <br />
<br />
but yeah, the poilce were idiots.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1229</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[roderick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:50:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1229</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Then you better admit that there is no evidence that the creative arts 'soothe the savage breast', that musicians and artists are grossly overpaid, and that we cannot persuade anyone to do anything.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Not acceptable</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c691</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:36:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c691</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[you are not wrong that the issue is insufficient supervision of the lawyers sending out these notices, but it is important that it was a third party sending out the notices, because it is a different kind of stupidity. Incidentally, the reason why the notice is sent out is because there was apparently some form of misuse of the trademark. Legally, you have to enforce a trademark, or you lose it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Every day it's the same thing</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c676</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:33:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c676</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Why does this keep happening?"<br />
<br />
Because lawyers don't really care about the publicity and reputation aspects as long as they get paid, and the companies have been conned into thinking they need aggressive copyright and trademark defences from the lawyers. Until they wake up and realise that the collateral damage can actually be worse than whatever they're defending against to begin with, it will continue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>