<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Precedents.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c588</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew D. Todd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:49:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c588</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Note that the Department of Energy guidelines quoted in my previous comment distinguish between "Normal Flying" and "Terrain Flying." Normal flying is 200-300 feet above the ground or above a nearby obstacle. There is an exception made for landings and take-offs. Nap of the Earth flying is basically justified in military situations, ie., when flying in against machine guns, and trying to go low enough not to be hit. That is the business of Army Aviation, not of civilian government pilots. The next two stops up are 25 ft above the nearest obstacle, and 100 ft, ditto. Both of these are considered risky by definition.  Note also that the National Parks Overflights Act claims quite substantial minimum altitudes, in a case where landing is not permitted.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c420</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackn]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:48:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c420</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Its a shame that people are able to judge without knowing the facts. Well, I guess -like the general population - there are stupid judges too. <br />
<br />
To bad someone can't claim incompetence (not just on this case) of a judge and have them quickly removed from service. esp when they are doing the kind of damage this judge has done. I am sure this pattern of not knowing what you are ruling on is not isolated to this case.<br />
<br />
Does this judge normally handle other complaints (like family court?). This seems a little out of her league.<br />
<br />
What a stupid judge. I guess this is why the wheels turn slowly. 5 steps forward and one idiot judge sends it 3 steps back.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Water Blasts are nice, but...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c568</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[GeneralEmergency]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:48:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c568</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[.<br />
<br />
A blast of water is nice but could prompt this very rude hobbyist to get angry and take a swing at you.<br />
<br />
Being a FPV(First Person Video) MULTICOPTER (Not DRONE, please!) hobbyist and pilot myself I can tell you that while the control signals from the transmitter are fairly secure 2.4 gigahertz band frequency hopping transmissions, the video transmissions from the copter to the Pilot's video goggles are simple FM (Frequency modulation) signals and are subject to jamming with a stronger signal.  I can also tell you that the video is either on the 900mhz band or the 5.8 gigahertz band and more likely the latter.<br />
<br />
The next time he shows up, send someone else down to ask interested party questions to get more technical information about his video link frequency.  Then buy a 600mW transmitter you need.  It will cost under $100.  Buy a "board camera" too for $30.  Install this setup near a window with the camera focused on a small sign that sends a "very special message" to your pest hobbyist. <br />
<br />
Personally, I'd like to apologize to everyone about this guy.  Virtually all of us FPV guys are just out having fun flying our model aircraft and are not interested in invading anyone's privacy.  Please don't lump us in with this jerk.<br />
<br />
.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c411</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:48:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c411</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Also for contempt of Court!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c394</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:47:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c394</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Has anyone been charged of convicted of fraud?<br />
<br />
By anyone, I mean anyone of the people this Judge stated had committed fraud?<br />
<br />
If not then what is stopping them from laying charges against this Judge for liable/slander?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c368</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:46:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c368</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[EFF are the most rabid piracy apologists in the nation. +1 head pat for your effort.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c567</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:46:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c567</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think the rational solution is to build your own anti-drone drone. Possible attachments to include tazers, water cannons, <br />
silly sting and more!<br />
<br />
Better yet think of all the innovation it would cause via patents with the words "from a drone" at the end. Hell you could even film it and patent the business model for selling the films to double down on innovation!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: just love you command of english</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c381</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rikuo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:45:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c381</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh you were commenting on the article as a whole? Rather than trying to find fault with a single sentence that grammatically doesn't have any faults? Also where is there a case of your followed by brackets? I've just searched for all instances of the word your, and nowhere on this page is there a bracket next to the word, so I don't know where you got that from.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c365</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:44:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c365</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"Wow, you guys really obsess over these guys. You do realize that there's all kinds of dirtbags out there who do way worse things, right?"</i><br />
<br />
You shouldn't talk that way about the people who sign your paychecks...<br />
<br />
...Or were you implicating yourself? In which case I'd start taking a card out of the Prenda book and plead the 5th...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Actually...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c100</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:44:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c100</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[X-47 only has its own control, as directed by an operator. Landings (and T&amp;G's) are completely automatic, controlled by the onboard computer.<br />
<br />
I can also understand why Naval Aviators are hesitant to use the automated system. I personally think that the one who tested the auto-landing system for the UCAS-D has balls of steel to ride an F-18 onto the deck with his hands off the stick.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: just love you command of english</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c359</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:44:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c359</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>And that was the end. Judge Alton then called a recess before the next case. </b><br />
<br />
So a complete sentence starting with "And" and ending with "end".<br />
<br />
<b>And that was the end</b><br />
<br />
What the fuck does that suppose to mean?<br />
<br />
I guess he really was trying to say<br />
<br />
<b>And that was the end, Judge Alton then called a recess before the next case.</b><br />
<br />
btw, it's not a 'recess' if they go onto another case.<br />
<br />
A recess is when you take a recess, and get back to that particular case.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: 30 year old debate...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c544</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spointman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:44:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c544</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That links to a movie called "Blue Thunder" for those who don't feel like clicking through. :)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Over 100C!!!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c375</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:44:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c375</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Also, to extrapolate a bit... <br />
<br />
According to this professor's logic if I had a laptop running at 100C that's like double 57C so that's double the harmful radio waves! And since the graphics card was situated right above my unmentionables we can further multiply the effects of the harmful radio waves by tenfold! <br />
<br />
But that means... <b>OH NO! I'M HITLER!</b>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c337</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:43:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c337</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Reason is entertainment from watching asshats from getting their just deserts. If other copystupids that fleece the public at large were being raked over the coals we'd saddle up to those posts with marshmallows too.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: just love you command of english</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c326</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:43:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c326</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're in no position to criticise anyone for their standard of English, darryl. Your usage of language is an insult to any thinking organism with a culture involving words. Talk to any solar panels lately?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c310</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:42:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c310</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[average_joe really hates it when due process is enforced by the courts.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: just love you command of english</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c296</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:39:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c296</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>)...the sentence does work perfectly in English. the</b><br />
<br />
'the' with a capital T please, such as The for the start of a new sentence.<br />
<br />
your , followed by brackets is not correct either, being superfluous.<br />
<br />
"about how a judge in Minnesota" capital for "judge" making it Judge as well.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>A good overview</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c532</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Lainson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:38:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c532</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2013/05/21/Whats-Grounding-the-Commercial-Drone-Industry.aspx#page1" rel="nofollow">What</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Over 100C!!!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c370</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:38:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c370</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No point on an old laptop. It was when it overheated in the middle of a game I decided to give my balls a break and buy a desktop. It's graphics card runs at a cool 60C!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Just go ALL PRENDA, ALL THE TIME.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c295</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:37:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c295</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You mad, Nora? Still obsessed with calling everyone children I see. Are you trying to project something?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>