<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/09382823173/chicago-school-system-foia-requests-stonewalling-obfuscation-paper-shredding.shtml#c209</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:05:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/09382823173/chicago-school-system-foia-requests-stonewalling-obfuscation-paper-shredding.shtml#c209</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is the <b>"Chicago Way"</b>, just like the Obama Admin, they do what ever they want and threaten/attack those that question their actions.<br />
<br />
<b>Scum bags!</b><br />
<br />
<b>If You're Going To Illegally Seize Citizens' Cell Phones, At Least Make Sure You're Grabbing The Right Ones</b><br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<b>IL Follows Suit: Employers Right To Ask For Social Media Passwords Codified Into Law</b><br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130423/06214822806/il-follows-suit-employers-right-to-ask-social-media-passwords-codified-into-law.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130423/06214822806/il-follows-suit-employers-right-to-ask-social-media-passwords-codified-into-law.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<b>Illinois Bill To Outlaw Online Anonymity Dropped Because People Got Pissed Off, Not Because It's Unconstitutional</b><br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130222/18003222079/illinois-bill-to-outlaw-online-anonymity-dropped-because-people-got-pissed-off-not-because-its-unconstitutional.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130222/18003222079/illinois-bill-to-outlaw-online-anonymity-dropped-because-people-got-pissed-off-not-because-its-unconstitutional.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<b>DOJ And Dept. Of Education To Colleges: Start Restricting Free Speech On Campus Or Kiss Your Federal Funding Goodbye</b><br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<b>Supreme Court Rejects Appeal Over Law Banning Recording The Police</b><br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121126/14083621150/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-over-law-banning-recording-police.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121126/14083621150/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-over-law-banning-recording-police.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<b>Seventh Circuit Court: Chicago Cops Can't Use 'Annoyance' As Reason To Stifle Free Speech</b><br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120912/20384720366/seventh-circuit-court-chicago-cops-cant-use-annoyance-as-reason-to-stifle-free-speech.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120912/20384720366/seventh-circuit-court-chicago-cops-cant-use-annoyance-as-reason-to-stifle-free-speech.shtml</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Quack Professor Releases Dumbest Violent Video Game Theory Ever</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c592</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orin Laney]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:02:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c592</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[OK, credentials.  I'm an electrical engineer and a certified electromagnetic compatibility engineer.  My business is knowing about those 'harmful' radio waves.  Fun physics fact: when a graphics card heats up, current consumption actually goes down.  The cute little MOS transistors inside have a negative temperature coefficient that helps guarantee thermal stability.  Result: the radio waves actually diminish somewhat when a graphics card gets hotter.  Fun regulatory fact:  the radio emissions for personal computers are held to levels low enough that they can't interfere with the Saturday morning Funny Bunny show your slack-jawed kids are watching on the boob tube.  Worrying about radio waves from a personal computer is like paranoia over the danger of heat stroke from exposure to moonlight.  Although, come to think of it, maybe that's what happened to the learned professor.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Look...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c195</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosmicrat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:01:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c195</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Squirrel!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c2084</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:01:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c2084</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> Any sensible officer </i><br />
<br />
If this were sensible I don't think any officers would have even been dispatched.<br />
<br />
"I'm sorry, you said water balloons?"<br />
"Right."<br />
"Sir, this line is for emergencies only.  Goodbye."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1711</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:00:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1711</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>I assumed you would *appreciate* me not making a claim about the validity without knowing much about it.</i><br />
<br />
That's a good point as I think you always jump on the invalidity bandwagon without being able to actually run through the analysis. I know that I couldn't do it, and I've never seen anything that makes me think you could either. The point though is that you didn't pull out the "invalid!" argument with this patent, and the reason why not seems obvious enough.<br />
<br />
Care to comment on whether specific criminal infringement is alleged in the indictment? I'll refresh your memory:<blockquote>On or about October 25,2008, in the Eastern District of Virginiaand elsewhere, the defendants, KIM DOTCOM, MEGAUPLOAD LIMITED, VESTOR LIMITED, FINN BATATO, JULIUS BENCKO, SVEN ECHTERNACH, MATHIAS ORTMANN, ANDRUS NOMM, and BRAM VAN DER KOLK did willfully, and for purposes of commercial advantage and private financial gain, infringe a copyright by distributing a workbeing prepared for commercial distribution in the United States, to wit, the copyrighted motion picture "Taken" (which would not be commercially distributed until on or about January 30,2009) by making it available on a computer network accessible to members of the public, when defendants knew, and should have known, that the work was intended for commercial distribution. (All in violation of Title 17, United States Code, Section 506(a)(1)(C) and Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2 &amp; 2319(d)(2))</blockquote>That's an allegation of specific criminal infringement. You claimed there were none. Can you admit that there is such an allegation or explain why this isn't one? Thanks. Source: <a href='http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/documents/megaupload-indictment.pdf' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/documents/megaupload-indictment.pdf</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: 35% Commission</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c522</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Starke]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:00:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c522</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, initially I'd assumed Amazon's payout would be a lot more stingy.<br />
<br />
I'm guessing, because they aren't printing anything, and won't be paying to edit the material, their overhead will be low enough, not to worry about the costs.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Chewbacca Defense</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c178</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[GMacGuffin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:58:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c178</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pure and simple.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: This strategy makes sense</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c156</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josef Anvil]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:58:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c156</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["What you have to remember is this: the Prenda people aren't 'bad lawyers' or a single aberration."<br />
<br />
Ummm yeah, I agree.  Extortion and Fraud make them criminals and they should be dealt with as such.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c789</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[alanbleiweiss]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:57:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c789</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm not relying on it.  I'm a forensic SEO consultant with a fair amount of digital security experience.  What I'm saying is sites need to get their security methods right. At the same time, Google claims to be a security backstop, yet they allow those URLs into their system.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c143</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:53:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c143</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm sure they have perfectly good reading comprehension skills. They're just hoping <i>others</i> don't have the same.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c1143</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:50:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c1143</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> How is this tool a way to infringe their copyrights at all? It's not like everyone is going to use it to create the exact same story over and over again.</i><br />
<br />
I think the idea is that ScrollKit is encouraging people to take regular NYT news stories and use this tool on them to turn them into whatever cool web news thing that it does.  I think that's stupid, but it sounds like that's the concern.  If that's what they're worried about, they should buy the tool and do it themselves before someone else does.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1707</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:49:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1707</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Here's coverage of Dotcom's patent trolling from Ars: <a href='http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/05/kim-dotcom-claims-he-invented-two-factor-authe' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/05/kim-dotcom-claims-he-invented-two-factor-authe</a> ntication-but-he-wasnt-first/ and Guardian: <a href='http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/may/23/kim-dotcom-authentication-patents' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/may/23/kim-dotcom-authentication-patents</a> and IPCopy: <a href='http://ipcopy.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/kim-dotcom-and-the-two-factor-authentication-patent-inventor-' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://ipcopy.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/kim-dotcom-and-the-two-factor-authentication-patent-inventor-</a> or-not/</i><br />
<br />
Good stuff.  I had looked around last night when I wrote this and looked for prior art, but having not found any, I didn't comment on the validity of the patent.  I assumed you would *appreciate* me not making a claim about the validity without knowing much about it.<br />
<br />
But, yes, based on those links, it looks like the patent is pretty questionable, which reinforces the point I made above (which you conveniently want to ignore) that I agree that this is abusive behavior.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c1135</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:48:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c1135</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>If that's the case, why can't I go to Flickr, download images, and use them in a TV advertisement? </i><br />
<br />
You might be able to, if your ad has something to do with how the photos are used on Flickr.  Maybe for a competing service or a Flickr-related browser plugin.  It depends on how the fair use factors weigh out in that particular case.  If you just need a photo of a dog for your dog food commercial, that is not going to fly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c120</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian Perez]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:48:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c120</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wait...are you serious? The evilmonkey guy is you? I see you on like, every blog ever, but this is "becoming a part of the story."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c100</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:48:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c100</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You do not need to have "Anonymous" in your nym in order to be a loudmouthed gay guy that calls Prenda lawyers idiots and their bosses scammers.<br />
<br />
My nym doesn't have "anonymous" in it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c443</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manok]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:48:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c443</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[2 Gb free hard disk space for a standard resolution movie? C'mon, everybody knows that those movies are 700 Mb !  Oooh, perhaps the DRM takes up the rest of those 2Gb?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Gov. speak</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/09382823173/chicago-school-system-foia-requests-stonewalling-obfuscation-paper-shredding.shtml#c199</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:48:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/09382823173/chicago-school-system-foia-requests-stonewalling-obfuscation-paper-shredding.shtml#c199</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey, come <i>on</i>!<br />
<br />
Nixon was very plainly a bastard and a villainous President.<br />
<br />
But at least he got things <i>done.</i>  Better than the shower currently in the Houses.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c98</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:46:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c98</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maybe he's just freaking out?<br />
<br />
I'd be pretty spooked too if an evil pirate monkey with 1337 h@x0z 5ki11z started emailing me.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1703</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:45:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1703</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[LOL! Mike runs from discussions on the merits faster than anyone else I know, including everyone else who posts on TD. Seems like everyone here is happy to discuss the merits except for Mike. Wonder why not... Hmmmm....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1700</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:44:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1700</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's coverage of Dotcom's patent trolling from Ars: <a href='http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/05/kim-dotcom-claims-he-invented-two-factor-authentication-but-he-wasnt-first/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/05/kim-dotcom-claims-he-invented-two-factor-authentication-but-he-wasnt-first/</a> and Guardian: <a href='http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/may/23/kim-dotcom-authentication-patents' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/may/23/kim-dotcom-authentication-patents</a> and IPCopy: <a href='http://ipcopy.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/kim-dotcom-and-the-two-factor-authentication-patent-inventor-or-not/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://ipcopy.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/kim-dotcom-and-the-two-factor-authentication-patent-inventor-or-not/</a><br />
<br />
All suggest that the patent may not be valid, and there's even info about the equivalent patent abroad being ruled invalid in 2011. Funny how Mike, who loves to jump on the invalidity train, instead focuses on how this might be bad for Dotcom's pending criminal trial. No mention of how terrible trolling is or questions of the patent's validity. But yeah, Mike, you're not giving him a free pass. You're treating him like you would any other troll. Obviously. LMAO!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>