<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1532</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rikuo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:15:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1532</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["The more difficult to use and underground something is, the less people will use it."<br />
<br />
Heard of a little thing called the Prohibition? It was a little thing, you might not have heard of it, but it was a period in the 1920's when you couldn't buy alcohol. Shocking, I know. The government went around saying it was illegal to buy beer, and punished anyone they could find.<br />
Guess what happened? Even though it technically was difficult to buy beer (you couldn't do so openly, you had to be circumspect about it, go through shady channels, basically some amount of effort) and it was underground by default seeing as how it was illegal...people still continued to drink. In large numbers. The US government threw 15,000 agents last I checked at this, and failed completely.<br />
This was because the PEOPLE didn't want it to be illegal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;$1k/day</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c248</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:15:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c248</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gibbs is still on the hook. What Judge Wright is doing is, as he says, a bit of housekeeping. Gibbs is apparently still on file as one of Prenda's attorneys in this case, despite apparently no longer being one of their attorneys. Wright was asking for him to formally file for withdrawing from the case as it's lawyer to straighten out that bit of oddness.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1517</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:15:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1517</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You have made no such challenge.  You've just bitched and moaned like you normally do when proven wrong.<br />
<br />
AJ, let me give you some advice.  You're never going to convince anyone to join your side by making insane arguments like you do.  If you want to get people to agree with you, you may want to use some logic every now and then.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: The story that just keeps on giving</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c246</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[steell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:15:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c246</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[BS, I can think of at least four judges, plus possibly the appeals court. And I bet there are more.<br />
By the way, the Prenda team forced those actions on the judge.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1495</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmerl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:15:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1495</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>You're assuming that the same amount of infringement would occur in the absence of DRM. I don't think you can show that. The harder it is to infringe, the less people will do it</i><br />
<br />
Can you show that the presence of DRM decreases infringement in any significant manner? You can't. And those who created DMCA couldn't possibly show it. Empirical evidence however shows, that even with DRM present, content is pirated. The moment DRM is scraped - content is pirated as if DRM didn't exist. Even if DRM slightly slows this process (on the time which it takes to break it) - it's hardly relevant, since DRM is usually broken pretty fast.<br />
<br />
However, besides all these points, DRM itself is unethical. Therefore DMCA 1201 should be considered unethical.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: The story that just keeps on giving</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c241</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:11:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c241</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So what's Judge Ann Alton to you? Chopped liver?<br />
<br />
John Steele was the one who wanted to brag about making millions per day, and chose to drag his feet on revealing information, then publicly whine that the judge hates copyright. You do the math. Vindictive judges for vindictively uncooperative plaintiffs.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c222</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[sophisticatedjanedoe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:09:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c222</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey, John Steele, where is the <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2013/may/08/business/la-fi-prenda-porn-sanctions-20130508" rel="nofollow">promised</a> "a lot of egg on people's faces"???]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c430</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:08:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c430</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[horse with no name just hates it when due process is enforced. What's your excuse this time, jackass? Alton is a communist and anti-copyright?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c193</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:08:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c193</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Leave it to you to sink to catfight levels to promote the DMCA.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: The story that just keeps on giving</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c200</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[sophisticatedjanedoe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:07:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c200</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[John Steele agrees. Right after the April 2 hearing he told to his mates off the record that the judge was <i>immature</i>.. <i>like teenager</i>... <i>14 years old</i>.<br />
<br />
Don't ask me how I know.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1479</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:05:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1479</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&gt;You're assuming that the same amount of infringement would occur in the absence of DRM.<br />
<br />
If there's no DRM preventing me from making a backup I wouldn't have to download a copyright-infringing copy of the same file, you pinhead.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>No Nutella for me</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c598</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheogorath]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:04:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c598</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't care that there's been a reconsideration on Ferrero's part, any company that hires lawyers and doesn't oversee their actions doesn't deserve what business I might drive their way, so I'm continuing my boycott. World Chocolate Spread Day is on February 5th, 2014, everybody!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1456</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:02:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1456</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I'd like to own the money I earned by my labor instead of having it stolen by the government before I even see my check."<br />
<br />
Yeah, we can do that.  Everything that the tax money pays for (roads, sidewalks, street lights, police, firemen) will from this day forth be payed for by you directly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Welly-welly-welly-well, Rikuo...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3817</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uriel-238]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:59:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3817</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It seems the girl didn't actually do anything wrong. And <a href="http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/region_indian_river_county/sebastian/floridas-romeo-and-juliet-law-could-be-used-in-kaitlyn-hunt-case-removes-sex-offender-status" rel="nofollow">the state's Romeo &amp; Juliette law <i>is</i> applicable</a>...at the discretion of the judge.<br />
<br />
Here in California, for example, she wouldn't have even committed a crime.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>GIbbs</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c186</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:58:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c186</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am wondering if Gibbs may not become a "friend of the court" or a witness against Preda in future legal wranglings. I would not be surprised as Steele seems to be trying to blame him for everything and his only option really is to come clean and admit everything in the hope of just losing his license to practice law. <br />
<br />
I just hope he has paperwork that can be used to prove that the court has been lied to and that Steele and Hammershite are and have been lying to the court. If he can identify where all the money went i am sure the court will be able to seize most of it if this is not resolved soon. Saying that i wonder if they have all transferred ownership of their assets to their wives and other business partners.<br />
<br />
If i was anyone they knew i would be telling them to keep me out of it all and to stay away from me until this is all resolved. I am sorry but when they have already thrown friends under the buss i would not be taking a chance that i was going to be next.<br />
<br />
That is unless they gave me a few million to look after for them, then i would be transferring it and moving out of the country to retire in some place they could not find me.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: You don't get it</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c373</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:56:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c373</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Attention or otherwise isn't the point of this discussion. The point is someone acting stupid (irresponsible posts on Facebook, in this case) and then attempting to draw attention away from it. People will discuss it but not for the reasons they'd like to.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don't Trust &quot;FIRE&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1374</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad C. Mulligan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:52:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1374</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Has anyone bothered to actually check out FIRE's website?  The organization behind it is clearly publishing right-wing anti-intellectual propaganda designed to stifle the free exchange of information in higher education (ironically enough).  Many of their articles seem to attack anyone who doesn't support a conservative economic and social agenda (just look at who's listed in the "Media Room" section).  <br />
<br />
The context of this particular article is interesting, as it's embedded in a larger narrative that seems to give the impression that sexual harassment and abuse is actually a non-issue for women on campus, which -- if you ask any women on campuses today -- is clearly not the case.<br />
<br />
I frankly find thefire.org an insidious presence online -- a stealth ultra-conservative group that makes things sound just reasonable enough that their articles get picked up by respectable websites like Techdirt (and Boing Boing, the other website I've seen citing them) because they at first glance appear to support a more progressive "open" political agenda.<br />
<br />
I would urge the authors of this website (as well as its readers) to use good judgement and critical analysis of sources before jumping on the bandwagon.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c1097</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:51:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c1097</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>Don't like it? Just close the book!</b><br />
<br />
You miss the point.  It isn't about just the content of the book or my reading it, rather the concern is the effects of that book on society as a whole and certain impressionable members who may choose to act differently after reading it.<br />
<br />
Left alone and permitted without restriction, this sort of thing expresses that society thinks this is okay, acceptable in it's own way, and that the acts portrayed in it are equally acceptable.<br />
<br />
Those acts are not acceptable.  Discussion and enjoying of those acts, even as "fiction" certainly runs the risk of eroding society and encouraging bad acts.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1444</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akari Mizunashi]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:50:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1444</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mike, <br />
<br />
I applaud your fervor for trying to do something to correct the issues, even if it means "one step at a time", but the problem is the "fix" is covering an issue that, in my opinion, isn't as relevant as the rest of the law.<br />
<br />
If someone came to you an claimed patching a leaky hole in a dam is fixing the dam, how much credibility would you put into the remark?<br />
<br />
The hole obviously indicates there's a problem with the dam, just as the anti-circumvention clause indicates there's a problem with the law.<br />
<br />
I know I should be much more supportive, but I suppose I'm just tired of getting my hopes up only to see the crushed as either not enough people stand up to repair the dam or that the faulty contractor bribes enough politicians to make the issue go away another day.<br />
<br />
This is what this law does. It pushes the bigger issues away for another day, and until this day arrives, businesses (who are trying to serve those very customers complaining they can't do with their product as they want) are being closed down due to the much, much bigger problem of the DMCA: take down notices and false claims of copyright ownership.<br />
<br />
Bigger fish to fry, and this law seems to be going after goldfish rather than the white whale.<br />
<br />
Good luck with this fight, but I hope no one minds I sit this one out.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c983</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:49:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c983</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Your previous post was reasonable, but not this one. I haven't seen any comments here claiming she wasn't 'asking for it'. I wouldn't even berate his reaction except for one thing: he reacted WAY to soon, and with WAY more force then was necessary! The other officers looked like they wanted to throttle her too, but none of them gave in to that desire. They just ground their teeth and carried on doing their jobs. If they were my police I could be proud of them for that. At least until they were given the opportunity to attack. Instead of joining him they should have been restraining him. That would have shown excellence. At the very least they should not have supported his actions. That made them no better then any vigilante mob. Any other group of citizens who reacted for those reasons would be in jail now. <br />
<br />
If you want to try helping the police try encouraging good behaviour rather then defending bad behaviour. Don't just sit around and whine about what others are doing, go video tape them doing good deeds and post those on YT.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>