<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c876</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:27:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c876</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They all the site owner would have to do is delete the content and then use a program like KillDisk or Evidence Eliminator securely wipe it, so that police forensic tools cannot recover it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c863</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:25:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c863</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not one well known figure skating site. They have a section for political discussions, as well are normal figure skating fare. However, since, they, and their servers, operate out of Germany, they are not subject to any American laws. Since they, and their servers, are in Germany, they are only subject to the laws of Germany.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c84</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:21:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c84</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[the frustrating thing is, there is no need for any of this shit anyway! the entertainment industries know what they need to do but refuse to do it. they seem to think that they have to stop file sharing at all costs! rather than listen to what people keep telling them, they ignore it. rather than do as people ask, the carry on down the same ridiculous road. instead of doing what they know is the sensible thing and MAKE SHIT LOADS OF MONEY, they insist on doing the opposite and carry on suing the very people they rely on, the customers, which then obviously COSTS SHIT LOADS OF MONEY!! it dont take rocket science to work out which is the better option!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Used Games</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1692</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lurker Keith]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:14:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1692</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[To be fair, I'm pretty Hollywood &amp; the Record Labels did try (whether it was w/ tapes or CDs/ DVDs, I'm not sure; wouldn't surprise me if they attempted it w/ each change), but ultimately the courts told them "NO! We're not undoing First Sale Rights."<br />
<br />
I don't understand why that isn't good enough for everyone?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c68</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:14:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c68</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[something that isn't mentioned but is extremely relevant is the fact that any type of 3 strikes law is banned in every country in the EU. no one is allowed to be disconnected. it is totally illegal to do so!<br />
as for the figures from independent sources, the government refuses to take any notice of these, (even information and recommendations from the government sponsored investigator, Professor Ian Hargreaves, is often ignored) as does the entertainment industries, who actually try to make out that the losses 'are considerably higher' than the estimates already put forward. the important term here is 'estimates'. no one in their right mind can estimate losses. it is an unprovable amount. to then say, as i saw  the head of the UK movie industry say 'the estimate should be much higher' is totally absurd!!<br />
France is about to disconnect their first 'file sharer', even though it is illegal. i am waiting, like others, to see the outcome. France could find itself in deep shit here and to no small amount, the entertainment industries too!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c839</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:12:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c839</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mike is 'censoring' you so you can't respond, but you somehow can post your persecution drivel here? And I thought you had a smidgin of logic left. Oh wait, no I didn't...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: bout time</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c818</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:10:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c818</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So Facebook goes around making people kill themselves, bashing people, bullying people or even directly killing people? No? Just a few psychotic users? Ah.<br />
<br />
"Given all the suicides, bashings, bullying ,and yes, even murders _directly attributed_ to telephones, I think its high time those gutless cowardly bastards were held accountable for their part.<br />
<br />
death to AT&amp;T/Verizon!"<br />
<br />
Now makes as much sense - but there would be more people agreeing with you ;)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c796</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:07:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c796</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And four-year-olds and adults and anyone who kills someone with a gun in a non-self defence situation.<br />
<br />
Oh wait, that would be a scary proportion of your population.<br />
<br />
Although now I think about it, 'crazed loonies' is a good description of your gun lobby. 'Wayne "Crazed Loony" LaPierre' has a nice ring to it. Or 'Charlton "Prise my gun out of my crazed loony dead hands" Heston'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c68</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:03:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c68</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, this is a case of EXPANDING copyright, not ENFORCING it. <br />
But by all means, carry  on your ranting, don't let the actual article get in the way of your preconcieved notions.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c441</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:01:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c441</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What is there to censor? If he were censoring you, why aren't your posts vanishing? Why would we care about your spittle-filled rants anyway? All they are is you making unfounded assertions with no evidence, wrapped in ad-homs and temper tantrums, and served up with lashings of your 'Mikey' obsession/love affair.<br />
<br />
Frankly, I could get more intelligent discourse on Free Republic, Spearhead or InfoWars...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c791</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:59:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c791</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Neighbor kills stranger in my front yard. Police can't find neighbor, arrest me instead.<br />
AGs want this legal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c424</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:57:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c424</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Does that mean he runs on solar power? Can we ship him to the South Pole for the next three months? :)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: An excellent piece of defending without admitting:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c400</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:56:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c400</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google! Derp! Google! Bawk!<br />
<br />
There, I managed to contribute more to this than your ongoing Google paranoia.<br />
<br />
Seriously, if you were picking on other 'big search' or ad-monetised content (FB etc) you might seem reasonable, but you seem incapable of moving off your MS-sponsored talking points.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c62</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:49:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c62</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In September 2010, I wrote to the minister responsible, Ed Vaizey and got a response, not written by him, which included <br />
<br />
"... whilst the specific figures may have been questioned there has not been a serious attempt from any side to deny that this widespread infringement is causing harm to the creative industries, which is why it should be tackled as quickly as possible"<br />
<br />
and also <br />
<br />
"Figures are not available for the losses from unlawful file-sharing in other content industries such as publishing as you rightly mentioned, business software or computer games, but it is clear that they are all suffering significant losses."<br />
<br />
Apparently if you discount all the people and studies that have pointed out the decided lack of harm to the creative industries from copyright infringement you end up with a situation where no 'side' has made a serious attempt to deny such. Maybe there had only been jocular attempts to do so.<br />
Also, lack of even estimates of loss, indicate significant losses.<br />
<br />
Of course back then they were careful to note that<br />
".. the provisions of the Act are designed to build gathering of impartial evidence and real feedback on impact to all parties..."<br />
and that<br />
"This process will continue as Ofcom researches benchmark levels of copyright infringement and assesses the initial impact of the two initial obligations.  These assessments from Ofcom will provide the sort of evidence that you want to see and that the Government agrees it would need to have before taking any steps that would impact on people]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c46</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:48:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c46</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[hey are waiting until after the election, so that they can then find jobs for any MPs that lose their seats.<br />
/sarc]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Legislative process</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1232</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven William]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:43:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1232</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maybe we should just cut to the chase and save everyone time, money and energy and make everything illegal and a crime, then the attorneys aka legislators can start working backwards and pass new "laws" telling us what we are allowed to do that is no longer illegal? Seeing as there are now more laws on the books than a man or woman could count in a lifetime, and ignorance of the law is no excuse (unless you are a federal judge (think A. Howard Matz [recently retired], a cop or a persecutor) it seems "a prudent thing."<br />
<br />
A PS Fact: Do to so many so called "laws" the fact is "You're (Probably) a Federal Criminal."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:  Imagine doing that to a judge.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1207</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven William]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:34:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1207</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They and you have the same right to shoot at any one claiming a right that doesn't exist while in the attempt of a false arrest. The men in your story may believe they are acting within the law, as in a law unto themselves, but many a dead person has. It all comes down to how fast can you shoot? A violation or attempt of a violation of a fundamental right always does. U.S. v John Bad Elk.<br />
<br />
We are now a nation of the rule of men, not the rule of laws.<br />
<br />
FACT: There are no rights recognized in Federal Courts, except to plead for bail.<br />
<br />
The so-called rules of law are for the poor, the uneducated and working class. Everyone else is privileged, entitled, exempt or immune from so-called rules of law.  How ya like those rules?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c923</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:34:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c923</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Enjoy your tiny echo chamber, LOL!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c922</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:33:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c922</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Enjoy your tiny echo chamber, LOL!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c902</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:33:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c902</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Enjoy your tiny echo chamber, LOL!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>