<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c221</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:17:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c221</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lord Mandy must be crying in fear of seeing his baby being shot down before ever growing up... Speaking of which... Where is the moron these days? Is he dead yet?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Some clarification</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c228</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny L]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:14:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c228</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This law has three requisites, that need to be fulfilled for it to take effect:<br />
<br />
1) The photography must be HIDDEN. That is, the moment you bring out your camera in full view, none of it applies.<br />
<br />
2) The hidden photograpy must take place without permission from the subject(s)<br />
<br />
3) The act must take place in an environment where the subject(s) have a reasonable right to expect privacy. That is, indoors in ones own home, inside a dressing room, in a restroom or similar environments.<br />
<br />
This law is meant to complement laws against harassment, where the law is interpreted such that you cannot claim to be harassed in cases where you didn't realize AT THE TIME that you were being photographed.<br />
<br />
That particular loophole, if you will, led to extensive debate here in Sweden a while back, after a couple of public cases were tried and the accused was acquitted of harassment after having secretly videotaped his tenant in her bathroom using a hidden camera. He was on the other hand convicted of violating the privacy of her home by entering without permission in order to install the hidden camera.<br />
<br />
Under this new law he would be convicted of unlawful harassing photography since the law's three requisites would have been fulfilled.<br />
<br />
There are also two excemptions to the law:<br />
<br />
1) regarding law enforcement use of hidden photography; that is you can still be subject to being spied on if you're a reasonable suspect of a crime.<br />
<br />
2) reasonable use. If it can be shown after the fact that the photography was justifiable, for example to gather evidence or for a photo journalist to document something of public interest, the law doesn't apply.<br />
<br />
So, in summary, although fears have been raised by free speech activists and others (me included), the law actually does seem to be well written and sufficiently narrow in scope to not hinder everyday use of photography.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c207</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:12:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c207</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[this sounds as if it has been done so as to stop the gathering of evidence needed for prosecuting people of power and high positions. in other words, a type of gag order. cant imagine where the idea for that came from!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c199</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:12:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c199</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Open source and other successful stories that don't rely on Intellectual Property laws tend to be disregarded as failures or lack of development by the IP supporters simply because they don't make shitloads of money. I mean, how do you measure success?<br />
<br />
So developer A produces some set of softwares that are freeware and make enough money to live comfortably but not in luxury while having a small extra for equipment maintenance and upgrading whereas developer B makes billions with the same type of software but with fancier UI and a few extras that facilitate the end-user lives.<br />
<br />
Is dev A a failure? Or is he successful in building a decent software? And how does dev B make millions if there is software that do the same for free? Could we say dev B is successful in adding value to software already available for free?<br />
<br />
It is very relative. For me both devs are as successful as any other person making a living of what they love to do as their main "jobs" and revenue. The difference here is that dev B only thrives with light IP protections in place while if there's a more lenient system both of them can thrive. Both of them will have to work to provide a decent product though.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid. Mike is a hypocrite.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c728</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:12:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c728</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I've noticed blue is just becoming lazy. It seems like he's just becoming an aggregate for other people's opinions.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Question</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c201</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:10:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c201</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Doesn't a 'private environment' opened up to a crowd become a 'public environment'?<br />
<br />
Example, I host a party at my home, wouldn't that become a 'public environment' as I am inviting people from outside into my home?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c703</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChrisB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:09:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c703</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Grown adults freely entering into contracts. You are against this? Why? Because you know better? You feel we have to protect those "vulnerable adults" from their own decisions?<br />
<br />
The reality is if interns had to pay for the skills and experience they were learning out of their salaries, they'd be in the red.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c693</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:07:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c693</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Don't forget revolving door favors.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Nothing to see here</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c684</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Griffiths]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:06:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c684</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["The issue here isn't dealing with troll"<br />
<br />
I.e. your "is" is irrelevant to my proposed action for the reasons I then stated.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c956</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:01:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c956</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I thought it was only one, then it was a dozen across multiple countries and now it's 50. Keep ramping up those numbers because it doesn't matter if it's 1,000 a year, you're still dealing with a lower number than people drowning in their swimming poos each year and you use this as a reason to violate my 4th amendment rights. Fuck you and your reasoning.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Nothing to see here</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c675</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:59:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c675</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>I'd much prefer if</i></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Nothing to see here</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c657</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Howard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:59:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c657</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Explained better than I could.<br />
<br />
The other point is that if you look at the length of the replies, you'll notice that they take up a prominent part of the comment section, and it's annoying to have to browse through all the pointless trollbashing to find good comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c101</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:57:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c101</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Indeed Epic win for the Taiwanese! What we need now is to reach a critical mass of awareness everywhere to stop the censorship flow and start reacting.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c648</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:56:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c648</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The executives just want everything for free, freetards.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c627</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:49:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c627</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[but ... but ... but ... how are big executives supposed to get paid lots of money for doing nothing if they have to actually pay those they owe money to?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Nothing to see here</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c624</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Griffiths]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:48:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c624</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The issue here isn't dealing with troll, if you ignore him he won't go away and may even escalate his insanity but at the moment every thread is the same old crap. Techdirt takes the view that the trolls can spirt interesting debate, which they often can, but <i>this</i> can't and it's just bubbling over with the same people saying the same things over and over. Repeating the same actions and expecting different results is madness, the troll is mad but the rest of us show know better. I'd much prefer if we could just act like these troll posts are the dog crap they are and avoid treading on them while we get on with our lives.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Translated to Swedish Chef</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c176</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:48:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c176</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here-a oon Techdurt ve-a'fe-a hed stureees ebuoot hoo zee ubeeqooity ooff deegitel cemeres is chungeeng zee vey ve-a luuk et poobleec ifents und ert. Boot es hes elsu becume-a cleer, zee ebeelity tu teke-a phutus ooff mure-a oor less iferytheeng ve-a see-a breengs veet it certeeen prublems -- ispeceeelly iff vhet ve-a see-a ere-a puleece-a. Su it ves perheps inefeeteble-a thet zee puleeticiuns vuoold stert tu get infulfed, in oorder tu &qoout;sulfe-a&qoout; sume-a ooff thuse-a prublems. Here-a's a rezeer ixtreme-a ixemple-a frum Svedee, es repurted by TechHeefe-a:<br />
<br />
<i><br />
Svedee's perleeement hes futed in fefur ooff a lev thet buns tekeeng peectoores und feelming in a preefete-a infurunment veethuoot furst getteeng permeessiun frum peuple-a in ettendunce-a. Creetics sey zee lev is tuu embeegoouoos.<br />
<br />
Zee Svedeesh Cummeettee-a oon Joosteece-a seeed zee lev, vheech gues intu iffffect Jooly 1, is needed seence-a phutugrephs oor mufeees secretly shut in preefete-a setteengs cun sereeuoosly feeulete-a un indeefidooel's preefecy, und prutecshun hes beee inedeqooete-a.<br />
</i><br />
<br />
Vell, thet mey be-a trooe-a, boot it's herd tu see-a hoo ixectly thees is gueeng tu vurk iff yuoo vunt tu teke-a a peectoore-a in a fery crooded ruum, sey -- hoo ixectly ere-a yuoo sooppused tu get iferyune-a thet meeght be-a in a phutu, tu egree-a? Dues it hefe-a tu be-a in vreeting su thet yuoo cun prufe-a it? Und vhet ebuoot iff it's nut a ruum, boot steell a &qoout;preefete-a infurunment&qoout;? Cume-a tu theenk ooff it, vhet ixectly is thet, unyvey? Frum zee erteecle-a: <br />
<br />
<i><br />
Zee lev duesn't speceeffy vhet cunsteetootes cunsent oor deffeene-a a preefete-a infurunment. Fur ixemple-a, vhet heppens iff a juoorneleest infeetes a booseeness ixecooteefe-a tu a recepshun in zee juoorneleest's hume-a und secretly phutugrephs zee ixecooteefe-a cummeetting a creeminel ect, esked Mereea Ferm, member ooff perleeement fur zee Greee Perty, dooreeng zee debete-a.<br />
</i><br />
<br />
Thet underleenes hoo thees is leekely tu be-a used: tu stup refeleshuns ooff vrung-dueeng by poobleec feegoores in preefete-a pleces. Et leest zee noo legeesleshun is evere-a thet thees is un issooe-a:<br />
<br />
<i><br />
Un ixcepshun frum creeminel leeebility is mede-a iff zee ect is joosteeffieble-a in feeoo ooff its poorpuse-a und oozeer curcoomstunces, und thet prufeesiun incloodes juoorneleestic vurk, eccurdeeng tu zee cummeettee-a.<br />
</i><br />
<br />
Boot unteel zee ixect leemits ooff thet prufeesiun ere-a deffeened, elung veet vhet &qoout;joosteeffieble-a&qoout; meuns, it seems inefeeteble-a thet zee noo lev veell hefe-a a cheelling iffffect oon infesteegetife-a juoorneleesm in Svedee. Thet's rezeer iruneec, seence-a yuoo meeght ixpect thet zee eboondunce-a ooff deegitel cemeres tudey vuoold leed tu zee reech und pooerffool beeeng cooght oooot und celled tu eccuoont mure-a oofftee, nut less. Bork Bork Bork!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hypocrites United!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c606</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spaceman Spiff]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:47:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c606</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fox, the MPAA, RIAA, Universal, and all of their ilk are complete hypocrites! They seem to think that the universe operates under the principle that "what's mine is mine, and what's yours is mine also"... :-(  It is time we taught them a new principle - "if you screw with me, you get the shaft"...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid. Mike is a hypocrite.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c589</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:46:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c589</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid."<br />
<br />
WONDERFUL!!!<br />
<br />
What's the next headline, fucktard?<br />
<br />
"Mike's paid minions are paid."<br />
<br />
You always have so much value to add. Thanks for the entertainment. Usually, you'd have to find a bus full of retards for stuff this brilliant.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c155</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:42:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c155</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[lol at #1. So you know how the NSA's 'activities' has been revealed as of late? Yeah, Sweden't been doing the same thing for quite a few years now so no, it does not solve any privacy problems. "2006/07:63" if you feel like looking it up.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>