<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c131</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:38:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c131</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Forgive me but the cynic in me says too much interests to side with transparency now... Still I hop I'll bite my tongue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Order 66</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/10535223120/indian-publishing-firm-cant-take-little-criticism-threatens-blogger-with-1-billion-lawsuit-criminal-charges.shtml#c246</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:37:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/10535223120/indian-publishing-firm-cant-take-little-criticism-threatens-blogger-with-1-billion-lawsuit-criminal-charges.shtml#c246</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So if you type your Zip/Post code wrong, or mis-spell a name, you're a criminal? Excellent!<br />
<br />
Now, just look for politicians publishing 'false' information...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eric's comment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c198</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:35:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c198</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If the fact that legal alternatives mattered then terrorists would already be unable to benefit from infringement, at least where legal alternatives are available. Since they do benefit from infringement (according to congress) that means one of two possibilities<br />
<br />
A: the existence of legal alternatives doesn't matter and so you bringing up the difference is irrelevant.<br />
<br />
IOW, the argument that abolishing IP law would stop terrorists from benefiting from infringement still holds. Adding stricter IP enforcement or stricter laws, like with prohibition, would simply reduce competition for the terrorists which make it even more profitable for terrorists to use infringement to support themselves (econ 101, less competition, more profits).<br />
<br />
B: There are situations where legal alternatives are unavailable (ie: Orphaned works) and that's where terrorists are benefiting.<br />
<br />
The solution here is for congress to pass laws ensuring that legal alternatives are always available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pricing</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130218/23563522021/copyright-harlem-shake-selective-enforcement.shtml#c456</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robbie]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:33:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130218/23563522021/copyright-harlem-shake-selective-enforcement.shtml#c456</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The people whom this public message he gave to could not afford to purchase it at any price.<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGQP-vQ_OPg" rel="nofollow">youtube</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08111723117/want-to-destroy-any-hope-serious-cybersecurity-give-doj-its-desired-backdoor-wiretaps-all-communications.shtml#c218</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:31:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08111723117/want-to-destroy-any-hope-serious-cybersecurity-give-doj-its-desired-backdoor-wiretaps-all-communications.shtml#c218</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The implications are rather simple. A backdoor would need some sort of lvl0 security hash or something. Eventually those things will be broken and inevitably before it can be patched when it's broken some ill-willed individuals will use it to take control of the current iteration of the software before the company can hope to patch the hole generating masses of zombie computers.<br />
<br />
Now imagine if those ill-willed people are the Chinese military...<br />
<br />
They should be VERY afraid of giving anyone the key to build a cyber-nuke.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: How is it different?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130509/18162523030/there-is-no-logic-to-argument-that-zach-braff-shouldnt-use-kickstarter.shtml#c2049</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis deems]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:28:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130509/18162523030/there-is-no-logic-to-argument-that-zach-braff-shouldnt-use-kickstarter.shtml#c2049</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If I had a kid the LAST thing I would do is set him loose on YouTube.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037.shtml#c1440</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:28:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037.shtml#c1440</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wow, who butthurt you enough to want to insult Mike over something that probably 95+% of the population don't know, and possibly half even of the tech-literate population?<br />
<br />
It's a shame because that was otherwise an Insightful, informative answer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eric's comment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c191</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:27:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c191</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're still not following me here. I understand you  are probably on crack like the rest of the shills (and the rest of Hollywood, ie: see all the actors in rehab) but try to follow.<br />
<br />
According to congress terrorist organizations are benefit from infringement.  I already hate IP law and so the takeaway I get is that, like with prohibition, IP law is responsible for them benefiting because without IP law they would be unable to profit from infringement. This just gives me even more reason to hate infringement. <br />
<br />
You state that the difference here is that there are legal alternatives. That statement means absolutely nothing and is irrelevant if terrorists are still benefiting from infringing works because, like with prohibition, if you abolish the restrictions (IP law) terrorists can no longer benefit (because people will just seek legal free alternatives instead of funding terrorists to pay for infringing works). <br />
<br />
If anything, what congress needs to do to completely stop these terrorists from benefiting from infringement is, according to your logic, ensure that legal alternatives are available. It is the unavailability of legal alternatives, according to you, that enable terrorists to benefit from infringement. Otherwise, if they were available terrorists would be unable to benefit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c19</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:27:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c19</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>The level of freakout from these giant companies over helping the blind is really quite incredible.</i><br />
<br />
You wouldn't believe the level of hatred this is generating when people get aware of those actions against the blind. A simple way to nullify these morons is to rise awareness. The backlash will do the rest.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c360</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:24:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c360</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ah Nintendo.. Ironically the ONLY reason I bought their console was because I could easily squeeze shitloads of games in an HDD and play them at will (aka piracy). So far I've found one or two that would really be worthy buying but really... Nintendo. I'll not buy next console though. In fact I think I'm done with locked up consoles and server based DRM.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c128</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:19:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c128</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They should just share it I mean it's not like any of us will actually understand it after they break it down into unintelligible jargon.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130518/00045923138/awesome-stuff-cool-product-designs.shtml#c219</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis deems]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:19:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130518/00045923138/awesome-stuff-cool-product-designs.shtml#c219</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree, the windcatcher looks amazing.  My days of going camping are behind me, but man it would have been nice to have one of these along.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c125</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:18:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c125</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[wrong.<br />
1)EA don't make games, they lend money to those who do and reap the rewards.<br />
2)Plenty of devs hate DRM and are vocal about it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c101</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:12:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c101</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[realising the benefits from going 'free' doesn't for one second mean that EA has learned anything. their fans are still prepared to play the 'old game', even more so now it's free. the chances are that they would gain more if the newer games were released at least at sensible prices but that would involve in EA having to admit that the 'old strategy' of cramming every new game with as mush DRM as possible is a flawed strategy. no game maker, movie maker or music maker is ever going to admit to that. it would mean that the customers <br />
knew more about what they want than the makers and that is an admission that is never gonna happen!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c90</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:10:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c90</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Gabe! Are you sure this will work?!"<br />
<br />
"HA HA HA, I have NOOOO IDEAAAAAA"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c124</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:08:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c124</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[For the individual to influence European politics, they should donate to public interest groups, and they call it a representative democracy!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/03220823047/mpaa-freaks-out-insists-that-having-to-consider-fair-use-before-filing-dmca-takedown-would-be-crazy.shtml#c1239</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donglebert the Needlessly Obtuse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:02:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/03220823047/mpaa-freaks-out-insists-that-having-to-consider-fair-use-before-filing-dmca-takedown-would-be-crazy.shtml#c1239</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Taking your argument at face value, that further undermines the MPAA or its represented parties.<br />
<br />
If the party that issued the takedown notice is being advised by a group that clearly knows of the fair use requirement, the lack of consideration of fair use should be considered a willful avoidance of the issue.<br />
<br />
Simply put, it should be written into their internal processes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c77</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[w0rkbench]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:56:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c77</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have only a couple of words for anyone who says free means dead.<br />
<br />
Team fortress 2]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c52</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:53:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c52</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Path of Exile did it right with cosmetic only items for sale.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c32</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:51:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c32</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You can't slash League of Legends in with SWTOR!<br />
<br />
That's offensive to SWTOR!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>