<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c35</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:33:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c35</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Leave it to you to elevate a cat fight.<br />
</i><br />
<br />
Not me.  Your buddies from the MPAA seemed to think it was a big deal.  Seems like maybe the legal issues are important, and you don't want that to happen, so you start throwing insults.<br />
<br />
Very adult like.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c986</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:33:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c986</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> That it would still be illegal to infringe misses the point that this would make it EASIER to infringe.</i><br />
<br />
Yes, because it is <i>soooo</i> hard to infringe anything these days.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c28</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:33:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c28</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A cat fight that shows how the DMCA can be abused, if Crosley-Corcoran wins think of the damage a group like Westboro Baptist Church could do by misusing the DMCA.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: average_joe</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c981</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:30:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c981</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>This means that tools for circumvention could be freely trafficked in.</i><br />
<br />
As opposed to the reality where they are freely trafficked in?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c800</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:29:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c800</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The cops should be punished for this and the punishment should assume their guilt.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/07475922914/why-even-good-hospitals-doctors-are-obstacle-to-better-cheaper-healthcare.shtml#c295</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:28:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/07475922914/why-even-good-hospitals-doctors-are-obstacle-to-better-cheaper-healthcare.shtml#c295</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Protip:  Home Health Aides are a popular alternative to nursing homes in the US.  It is commonly used for elderly patients who don't want to leave their homes, or can't afford a nursing home.  Don't talk about homecare it like its something new, its not.<br />
<br />
Source:  Myself, I support these Aides.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Ummmm 9/11</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1093</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheogorath]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:28:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1093</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Not only did you not count 9/11 in your 2012 grouping, you didn't even count it in your 2002 grouping (where it would belong)!!</i><br />
Since Timothy is grouping by year, 9/11 <i>doesn't</i> belong in the 2002 grouping, but the 2001 grouping. If you don't believe me, check out this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia article</a> on the attacks.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c18</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:27:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c18</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Leave it to you to elevate a cat fight.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c966</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmerl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:27:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c966</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Our point is that the DMCA was intended to enforce copyright</i><br />
<br />
At least in the context of section 1201 this isn't correct. From the start it wasn't about protecting copyright. It was about protecting <b>DRM</b>. Creators of DMCA 1201 knew it perfectly well. <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c946" rel="nofollow">See below.</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c783</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:26:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c783</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why would it matter. An infinite amount of information can not possibly be recovered and so if you rewrite the information a few times it will overwrite and erase traces of previously existing information.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c768</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:24:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c768</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The cops forcefully ceasing the phone leaves doubt and that doubt is unacceptable. The cops should be punished for forcefully ceasing the phone and such punishment needs to be severe enough to deter future situations even in the event that the cops are guilty.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Every day it's the same thing</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c521</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:21:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c521</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It seems to be a very common occurance.<br />
<br />
Blizzard, who is known for being relatively lax on enforcement, went legal on Valve for the names of the heroes in DOTA 2.<br />
<br />
I think there is something very wrong with the way enforcement is forced on companies to keep a consistent line on allowing use. To me it would seem relatively easy to make a standard contract describing what you will allow the product to be used for without needing licensing (which should be copyright as it stands today) and having standard licenses for the most common uses like non-corporate non-profit, commercial and transformative commercial.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1087</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[roderick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:21:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1087</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Yes, they should."<br />
Good. Then we can say that artists of all stripes are grossly overpaid since their works are essentially worthless.<br />
<br />
"Not impossible, but highly unlikely in the context of violent media. You need something more personal, or at least more profitable, to manipulate a person into killing."<br />
If it is not impossible, then that is exactly what Grossman is and have been trying to explain. We do not live our lives in a moral and intellectual vacuum. If we do not receive those moral and intellectual education from our parents, we will receive them from elsewhere, from a family mentor or even a murderer. Entertainment and political commentaries are no different in that regard.<br />
<br />
"Which no doubt lends validity to its content and leads to a much healthier attitude toward shooting the enemy in the head."<br />
This tells me you have not read Grossman's books.<br />
<br />
The difference between violent entertainment and the military is that the latter is a controlled environment. Under that is the difference that recruits in the military are of sufficient mental and intellectual maturity to understand the atrocity of killing another human being. For an an Air Force guy like myself, that atrociousness is more intellectual than emotional. But for an Army soldier and a Marine, either trooper are required to know killing at a much more physically personal level and that made the atrociousness of the act more emotional.<br />
<br />
This crucial difference is exactly what Grossman tries to make clear but people in their knee-jerk reactions to any alleged infringement of the First Amendment rights immediately ignored.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Error in article</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1074</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheogorath]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:20:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1074</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>2. 2002 - 14 incidents, 15 killed<br />
(note: the beltway sniper is counted as 11 separate incidents, which is stupid. This number should be 3 incidents total.)</i><br />
Eleven plus three equals the total of fourteen, so shouldn't the total of incidents be four in a sensible world?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c946</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmerl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:14:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c946</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You claim that dropping section 1201  (which is a fence around DRM) will weaken DRM, which will weaken copyright protection, which might lead to copyright infringement. Too far fetched of a claim. DRM is already one level removed from copyright. DMCA/1201 is one level more removed from copyright. DMCA/1201 doesn't protect copyright. It protects DRM. I.e. it's a preemptive policing of the second order (where DRM is a preemptive policing of the first order).<br />
<br />
So you are talking about some non tangible potential of affecting copyrights, while you ignore that DMCA/1201 very concretely violates users ability to exercise fair use. Therefore dropping DMCA/1201 will restore concrete users' rights and will not really affect any copyrights. Ignoring this is hypocrisy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c921</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:12:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c921</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Exactly. Further more, there are uses that copyrighted material may that are allowed by law, therefore, making something available for uses allowed by low, would now be legal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c758</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[rapnel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:10:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c758</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What the fuck?  It was a safety checkpoint.  It worked perfectly.<br />
<br />
On a more serious note, police are not gods, they have a job, they are supposed to know how to do their job, they get paid to know how to do their job, they exist to serve and protect and if they fail to uphold the core mission of their existence then they've failed.<br />
<br />
There's a bigger picture here.  Stop smelling the flowers and pay attention.  You're not all wrong but you must admit that neither were the police all right.<br />
<br />
Cameras and questions are valid.  Violence as a response is not.  Especially so when the "law" is, by default, skewed to the wielder.<br />
<br />
Those "same citizens" are the ones going out of their way, as mere citizens, to address the wrongs of power.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Setting the record straight</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1050</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:02:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1050</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In 1953, the US ousted the Iranian PM who was democratically elected for a CIA puppet dictator that happened to be a religious fundie group.<br />
<br />
The US also implemented Saddam in Iraq to help in the 70s.<br />
<br />
Both groups hated each other which can't be said enough.<br />
<br />
The US, being run by neocons, ignored Afghanistan and Al Qaeda even though Rumsfeld was given Bin Laden on a silver platter and he opted to ignore it.<br />
<br />
The public was lied to with Bush admitting that he committed the War effort to try to privatize Social Security (it's in his autobiography).<br />
<br />
He never should have been president.  He had the longest vacation of any president.  He increased our deficit to fund two illegal wars.  He destroyed civil liberties which Obama has continued when there are far better alternatives.<br />
<br />
Saddam was nothing more than a target for neocons for oil and the US got kicked out for having a private force (Blackwater) running like an occupation and killing people in the name of the US.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, Cheney makes BILLIONS off of the war effort for guns and murder while the soldiers get the mental health issues.<br />
<br />
And when we look at the costs....  The explosions of democracies from the removal of the status quo...<br />
<br />
I can't say it was worth taking out a dictator that we installed in the first place.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c912</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:01:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c912</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm sorry, no, wait, I'm NOT sorry at all, that clause really is total B.S. and goes against nature.<br />
<br />
If you own something, you can DO WHAT YOU WANT WITH IT!<br />
<br />
The first sale doctrine, the Supreme Court's ruling on the matter of buying something and then re-selling and doing what you want with it, states that copyright law does NOT trump a person's right to do with property as they please.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c908</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:59:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c908</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>your constant defense of KNOWN criminals like infringer-millionaire Dotcom of Mega;</i><br />
<br />
If he was being tried in the UK your post would be in contempt of court.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>