<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c321</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:51:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c321</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why is it assumed that KDC should be on the hook for maintaing the evidence on the servers?<br />
<br />
Wasn't it "seized" by the DOJ? <br />
<br />
If my car is seized as evidence, how exactly would I be responsible for maintaining the integrity of it, since I don't have possession of it?<br />
<br />
Sounds like a typical fuckup at multiple levels (or par for the course when it comes to the DOJ).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>NSA</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c311</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:51:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c311</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Doesn't the NSA have a backup copy of the Megaupload servers?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Forget about Dotcom and the case for a moment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c301</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Zen Master]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:50:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c301</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Think about all the idi-I mean, poor souls who uploaded their child's baby pictures/wedding photos/personal files/etc to MegaUpload without backing them up locally! They just lost all of that because of LeaseWeb.<br />
<br />
...Actually, hold on for a second. <br />
<br />
Since LeaseWeb's deleted all the content from the servers, does that mean that the data on Carpathia is gone as well?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c280</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:48:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c280</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[First police beating up people for looking at them funny, then massive surveillance of the general public, now casual destruction of evidence that incriminates the government.<br />
<br />
When did we end up in a novel about a dystopian future?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Herd of jackasses</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c262</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[SolkeshNaranek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:47:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c262</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[From the point of view of the DOJ, this is a God send.<br />
<br />
They (DOJ) currently look like a herd of brain dead jackasses with the way they have handled this case.<br />
<br />
Everything they have touched has gone straight down the tubes.<br />
<br />
If they file to dismiss the charges, it will only make them look even worse (if that is possible).<br />
<br />
By having the hosting provider delete possible exculpatory evidence, the entire proceeding is tainted thus warranting a dismissal.<br />
<br />
The case goes away for reasons beyond the control of the DOJ, letting them trumpet to the press how they would have convicted Kim, if not for the loss of evidence.<br />
<br />
This seems to be a big face saving win for the DOJ.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c320</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny L]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:45:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c320</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, the photo may not have been innocuous but still be justified. Let's say for example (I just made this one up) that a public figure denies knowing a particular organized crime boss. Then some investigative reporter photographs them both in bed together using a telephoto lens from across the street. That act would normally be a violation of the new law (and here intent matters - if your intention was to capture the building because you're interested in architecture it's not a violation but if your sole purpose was to catch them in the act you are), but since it can be deemed of public interest the photographer is not in violation of the law (but the publisher faces the risk of a libel law suit if he publishes, but that's another matter of course).<br />
<br />
It is still troublesome that it is the very ACT of photographing that is criminalised, not what they are later used for, which means that the photographer must be more aware when shooting - perhaps with little time to consider - rather than being able to contemplate the picture afterwards.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c247</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Zen Master]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:44:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c247</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And as I recall, the only reason that the DOJ was able to identify several infringing files (39ish? Can't remember for certain) and claim "HEY! MegaUpload's hosting infringing content! Send in ze marines!" was because those files were movies that had been submitted by the NinjaVideo group, which the DOJ was using as evidence. <br />
<br />
MU would've deleted the infringing files if the DOJ gave them the go-ahead (they were told all this through Carpathia), because the DOJ said "Don't do this or we'll charge you with tampering of evidence." So they kept them active and untouched, even after the NinjaVideo case ended, waiting for the green light from the DOJ to delete them. Instead, Megaupload gets taken down using those exact same files.<br />
<br />
Go figure.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c934</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark Helmet]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:42:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c934</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, first, I don't generally talk about my income level in public from any of my professional roles, here or elsewhere.<br />
<br />
That said, isn't the amount irrelevant to the discussion?  The question was paid vs. unpaid, not an argument over the balance sheet...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>DOJ Wanted the evidence gone</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c242</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:42:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c242</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Since the evidence proved beyond a shadow of any doubt that Megaupload was innocent of any wrongdoing, the DOJ can't have that embarassing evidence show up - so they ordered it deleted.<br />
<br />
Now the DOJ gets to see what it's like in prison since they tampered with and destroyed evidence in a criminal case, they get to go to prison (the people within the DOJ, no matter how high up, that ordered or okayed the evidence destruction).<br />
Can't wait to see them in prison orange.<br />
<br />
If they don't serve time, then no one can ever be tried for evidence destruction again.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>SOPA - &quot;Made in Taiwan&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c122</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:41:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c122</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[but "Assembled in America"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c116</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:41:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c116</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"However, seeing the writing on the wall (and, perhaps, someone showed the IPO folks what happened in the US), and the proposal was abandoned before the protest was even needed."</i><br />
<br />
Can the US Congress be replaced by the Taiwanese lawmakers? They seem to understand and get the picture must faster than their American counterparts. Isn't this country supposed to be smarter or more technologically advanced or something?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c224</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:38:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c224</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[From what I understand, in a case where few pieces of data from a hard drive can be retrieved (from someone attempting to destroy it) the less data you can get out of it the more incriminating that out of context data tends to be in courts.<br />
<br />
But that's in cases where the DEFENDANT does something to try to hide/destroy evidence against themselves on the hard drive, not the reverse with the prosecution doing that.<br />
<br />
Are the DOJ dumb enough to think this will be treated the same way as if Kim Dotcom destroyed the evidence?<br />
<br />
It would seem that due to the 1st ten amendments that the evidence the DOJ gathered is now inadmissible in court, which could destroy their whole case if this happens to the rest of the evidence on the other servers. Unless the judge is a real moron who doesn't read the constitution (entirely possible).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Some clarification</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c318</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny L]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:36:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c318</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So what would happen if the harassment law was amended such that you could sue for harassment even if you didn't know you were being harassed? How could that possibly work? (And note here that there are different laws for harassment and libel.) Anybody who disliked someone could claim to have been harassed for just about anything thought up after the fact.<br />
<br />
Also, did you even read my coment properly? The risk of "criminalising ordinary behaviour" is just about nonexistent.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c162</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:34:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c162</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Do to the reward/punishment structure in place, overclassification is inevitable.<br />
<br />
Overclassification causes little penalty for the worker.  It's a little harder to work with but your setup to handle it.<br />
<br />
Under classification causes a huge shit storm that can days to sort out.<br />
<br />
So naturally, shit storms are avoided]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c156</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord Binky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:34:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c156</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's why classification was used as a part of access, the other being need-to-know. Otherwise they just need many many more tiers of classifications to make it work, somewhere around 100 would be a good starting point.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c201</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:33:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c201</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It would be a pity if they did that, Leaseweb is a business, the government prevented those servers from being paid for. The court should find against the government not leaseweb.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c187</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:33:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c187</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[TOS would not trump need to preserve evidence the same way your ownership of an apartment would not allow you to clean and rerent it if it were a crime scene.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: DOJ's response</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c178</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:32:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c178</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Holder waves his hand and says...<br />
<br />
"These are not the servers you're looking for"...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>If you think that's bad</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c145</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[peter]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c145</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You should see the utter trivia which falls under the ITAR regulations.  Classified a 'munition /dual use technology' and almost treated as if it was secret includes, a battery charger, an RS232 cable,a truck engine.<br />
<br />
ITAR, America's joke on the world.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c170</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:29:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c170</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is only a bizarre move if the point was actually to try DotCom for some sort of actual crime, which it was not. This case was, pure and simple, about keeping DotCom tied up in legal proceeding in yet another attempt by the entertainment industry to try to limit/prevent serious competition. With the destruction of the data, even if he wins, potential clients are going to be quite leery of using any service he provides for fear of something like this happening again.<br />
<br />
At the end of the day, it's the consumers and content creators who are going to lose out, just as the entertainment industry wanted all along.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>