<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: To be fair...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c808</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:02:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c808</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> The immorality of the health care situation is staggering.</i><br />
<br />
Fortunately if you have good insurance you can see a doctor about your staggering problem.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1331</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:59:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1331</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why can't you say anything without being an ass? <br />
<br />
I wasn't talking off the cuff, I was using US Census figures: the median individual income in the US last census was around $44,000/year. You are using figures specific to commercial writing (which I think is a bit misleading, but that's a different discussion), I was using exactly what I said: median income.<br />
<br />
Your expectation for an experienced writer was $76,800/yr. That's pretty close to twice the median. Even if we accept your BLS statistics, you're still inflating the value considerably.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: So what's your precious Pandora EXCEPT gatekeeper?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c462</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:59:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c462</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The article starts as: "We've argued for years, that there are different kinds of middlemen involved in making markets. Some are efficient, leading to better reach, easier access, and more convenient transactions"<br />
<br />
A perfect description of what Pandora does and why it is an enabler rather than a gatekeeper.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c70</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[justok]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:58:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c70</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[tl;dr]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c164</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:56:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c164</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's almost non-existent to me as well. Every once in a great while I see a pop up or under. I actually want to see none. As in zero. <br />
<br />
I've learned long ago not to trust ads on the internet. They are a security problem and I will do everything in my power to prevent them from occurring on my machine. I know of several instances where others got malware through infected iFrames I didn't because I don't allow them to run.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1326</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:55:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1326</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You can't simply dismiss my assumptions. From your statement you consider yourself an entry level writer? OK, but I'd argue you are experienced. You can't simply ignore the the cost savings to Masnick by classifying you as an independent contractor. You pay double the SSI contribution and (I think FICA and FUTA as well). For employers who provide employees fringe benefits, treating you as a contractor saves them a lot of money. For employees, they pay it. For you, it goes back in his pocket. <br />
<br />
So what you are saying is that you are making about $1250/mo. for (hopefully) no more than 80 hours. That's about $15.62 an hour, with no benefits and you paying both the employer and employee share of payroll taxes. From money.cnn.com: <i>The survey from the National Association of Colleges and Employers showed the average salary of new grads at $44,455. </i><br />
<br />
So considering the saved costs of payroll taxes and benefits you cost Masnick half of the average cost a 2013 college grad. But hey, as long as you're happy...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>can't? more like won't...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c54</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:52:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c54</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["recognizing that we can't always keep up."<br />
<br />
I think s/can't/won't there is more accurate.<br />
<br />
I have plenty of "get off my lawn" moments as well - but at least I recognize them. I at least keep up with technology and modern culture, even if I don't always enjoy it.<br />
<br />
I also take time to educate my children on how things used to be done, so they don't just take for granted what they have now.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c29</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris ODonnell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:52:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c29</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was reading the biography of Daniel Boone a while back and in there is a rant about the problems of teenage pregnancies in the late 1700s.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c454</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:50:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c454</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, I suppose that is <i>one</i> possibility, though it would seem the more likely(and logical) reason for an essay like that to be gone through point-by-point, showing where it was grossly inaccurate, could be due to the fact that it <i>is</i> mock-worthy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Here's a Pirate Bay &amp;quot;enabler&amp;quot; who's been disintermediated from society!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c437</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:47:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c437</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In my peronal expereance people don't care one way or the other about IP/piracy]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Point of curiosity...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c159</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:47:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c159</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have never seen an unwanted popup from anybody, not even Netflix, since I started using NoScript.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c549</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:47:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c549</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[she would change her mind pretty quick if she found out that she was on the list to be spied on. she would then learn how the rest of us feel!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mark Twain opened my eyes about this</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c27</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:45:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c27</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I had a copy of "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" that had a rather lengthy introduction written by Twain. It consisted in large part of a diatribe against the youth of his day.<br />
<br />
I've never forgotten it because every single thing he said was precisely what people say now, right down to "it wasn't like this when I was young" and "society is doomed".<br />
<br />
Later, I learned that it has always been so: every generation thinks both that they invented sex and that society is about to collapse.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Lots of room to debate drones</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c531</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[weneedhelp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:43:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c531</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Living Under Drones: Death, Injury and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan Google then read.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Umm, Google has you all accustomed to its spying.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c529</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[weneedhelp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:42:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c529</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[WILL YOU JUST STFU ALREADY.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c970</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:40:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c970</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Now what?</i><br />
<br />
Now I suggest you brush up on some legal text because you have no idea what you are talking about.<br />
<br />
First and foremost, the government didn't seize anything.  If they had seized the servers then they would be in the governments custody, not LeaseWebs.<br />
<br />
In this case the government is attempting to destroy evidence by preventing a defendant from maintaining said evidence.  If this goes to trial I presume the DOJ will try to use an argument along the lines of "we never seized their equipment and therefore had no obligation to preserve it for trial" they would then try to pull out copies of some of the data and say "we were able to secure THIS evidence before the defendant destroyed the originals."  <br />
<br />
Personally I find it very unlikely that any judge will allow that evidence to be used at trial as the government does not have the originals and will have no way to prove that the copy wasn't tampered with.<br />
<br />
It seems the DOJ has no interest in actually bringing this to trial.  Instead they are using the legal system to administer the punishment without the conviction.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>doom</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c19</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous dutch coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:40:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c19</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[yes, but this time it's for real!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1313</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:40:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1313</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I'd say a minimum of $3200/moth for an inexperienced writer and double that for an experienced one."<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>So, you think that writers here should make more than twice the average income in the US? You aren't even on the same continent as reasonableness </i><br />
<br />
Unlike you, I don't simply talk out of my ass. From the Bureau of Labor Statistics:<br />
<br />
2010 Median Pay	 $55,420 per year <br />
$26.64 per hour<br />
Entry-Level Education	Bachelor]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c806</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:37:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c806</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>You mean Mao?</i><br />
<br />
Mow is the absolute dictator of my yard on Saturday mornings, so.....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1312</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark Helmet]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:33:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1312</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I think that an entry level wage for a writer is probably around $30,000."<br />
<br />
If you're full time, in-house employee, perhaps.  I'm neither. Nor are most of the other writers here.  Could we agree that for part timey work, that number should be about half?<br />
<br />
"Then most companies contribute modestly toward health insurance, so call that $4,000."<br />
<br />
You said you assumed I'm independent, which I am.  Therefore benefits aren't included and I wouldn't need them even if they were, so I'm glad they aren't.<br />
<br />
" Assuming the writer worked 40 hours per week to produce those articles, I'd say a minimum of $3200/moth for an inexperienced writer and double that for an experienced one."<br />
<br />
You're not very good at math.  You started at $30k/year, or  $2500/month.  Benefits are moot since I'm an independent contractor and we can cut your expectations in half since I'm part time, not full time.  Payroll taxes are meaningless as well, since the only thing that matters is gross salary (for the purposes of payment discussions, I mean).  What you arrive at is your suggestion, essentially, that a writer like me should make roughly $1250/month here.<br />
<br />
Let me assure you, my payment meets your expectations.  Glad you agree I'm compensated appropriately.  Can we move on now?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>