<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c522</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:11:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c522</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[IS ti not common for people to acknowledge those that came before them and encouraged them to produce a piece of software that would help design something new and compelling. <br />
<br />
I don't know if it is the fact that the people who created snow fall misled the NYT into paying for 6 months work where it could easily have been done in a few hours even without the tool. Yes there is still the time taken to investigate the story and question the survivors but to say that using them as an example of what is great and what the future could look like is nothing more than rewarding them for their design and hopefully encouraging them to make more of it available on their site.<br />
<br />
I am surprised that the NYT could think that pointing to them as a good example of what their software can achieve is bad in any way.<br />
<br />
If i was stroll i would have take a story and created a site and used that to show how useful the software is, ignore the NYT give them no acknowledgment for their design and just release it as something new.<br />
With the NYT going so crazy and not thinking they have enabled scroll to get a lot of much needed advertising, something i doubt was their intention to start with.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Copyright</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c513</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:10:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c513</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Where is the fair use?  This is being used to sell a commercial product.  The NYT has every right to ask not to be part of this, and has every right to ask not to have their copyright work used as part of it.<br />
<br />
Please show the actual fair use here, pointing to the fair use laws to explain.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Solution</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c130</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violated]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:08:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c130</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well 1, 3 and 5 would be invalid when even Police Officers have Fourth Amendment rights meaning their privacy cannot be violated by the Government until there are facts to indicate that they may have been involved in a crime.<br />
<br />
Number 2 does not seem too useful when Police Officers can lie but sure if their sanity is questioned then they can be sent off to be evaluated.<br />
<br />
Number 4 seems a fair request and part of the job agreement but weekly seems a bit too intrusive where random checks can work better.<br />
<br />
This whole case though is about cops not following established procedure rules, and even in breaking the law, where they will indeed be judged and fairly punished for what they have done.<br />
<br />
I would hope to see in this case that the system works with no changes needed beyond reminding Police Officers to actually follow the law and standard procedures.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Watch and adapt</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c129</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:06:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c129</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That is ideal, you're right.  I tried that but it seemed buggy with my phone (note II).  Hopefully they'll get some more developer support.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c807</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:06:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c807</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Claim ad coelum and shoot it down.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Watch and adapt</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c122</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelledin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:04:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c122</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Better yet, just use the ACLU's "police tape" app to remotely archive the footage as you get it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130421/21241622795/angry-prenda-is-angry.shtml#c382</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[sophisticatedjanedoe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:04:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130421/21241622795/angry-prenda-is-angry.shtml#c382</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nazaire <a href="http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/2013/05/22/prendas-local-jaques-nazaire-judge-wrights-order-is-irrelevant-because-anonymous-attacked-paypal/" rel="nofollow">continues to entertain</a>.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c560</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:01:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c560</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>... yet they ignore the robots.txt file's disallow instructions, and not only that, but publicly display links found on a site where those links were clearly delineated as "disallow" in that file.</i><br />
<br />
Do you have a citation for that? It's not that I don't believe you - just haven't heard that one before.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1582</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:00:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1582</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And to top it... will give them a lifetime of social shaming and disadvantage, via a "criminal record".<br />
<br />
Authoritarians and the sheeple following them are complete assholes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c794</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:57:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c794</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Close your curtains. Get reflective mylar curtains to stop thermal imaging if you think you need it.<br />
<br />
End of story.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Watch and adapt</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c121</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:57:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c121</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[When recording the police in the future, if they try to steal your phone for "evidence collecting," the right thing to do is to run away and upload the video.  That's what I'm getting from all of these stories.  Handing your phone over willingly is giving up liberty (yours and others') and supporting the police state.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>But Hangouts isn't preloaded???</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c161</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JackieTreehorn]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:56:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c161</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hangouts is replacing Google Talk, it's not actually installed by default on my phone.  Case in point:  I have a Galaxy Nexus with Google Talk on it, and Hangouts waiting as a downloadable update in the Play store.  How can Hangouts be considered pre loaded when it quite clearly isn't the same app that came on my phone?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c105</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:52:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c105</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nine trained police officers work as a team to murder someone in cold blood and keep their jobs, and Aaron Swartz was charged with 13 felonies for making knowledge more accessible.  I think I'll start saving to gtfo of here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c544</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[alanbleiweiss]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:48:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c544</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[uh complicit?  explicit?  expletive deleted?  #FastRantTypingStrikesAgain]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Return to active duty</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c103</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:47:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c103</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>...since May 15...</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Yeah. The report in the <i>Bakersfield Californian</i> is datelined Monday, May 13, 2013.<br />
<br />]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c519</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:47:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c519</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I just checked the info page for wget, it respects the robots.txt file when recursively downloading a site. Therefore it seems that the site had not even blocked indexing of the documents.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c506</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[alanbleiweiss]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:46:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c506</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[While Google is not ultimately responsible for other the administration of other sites, they have chosen to take a stand against hacked sites and malware ridden sites, going so far as to block them from search results pages. <br />
<br />
Google claims to be on the side of security, yet they ignore the robots.txt file's disallow instructions, and not only that, but publicly display links found on a site where those links were clearly delineated as "disallow" in that file.  As such, they are implicit in the breach.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thieves in the night</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1557</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zem]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:43:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1557</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The police involved not only beleive they are doing the right thing but that "you" have instructed them to act this way.<br />
<br />
This is just another example of what happens when you give up freedom for safety.<br />
<br />
In the end you lose both.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's like Tethering all over again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c138</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bengie]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:43:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c138</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The issue with tethering is My wife's smart phone browsing the same web pages and watching the same videos will consume 1/10th the data because the viewing experience is targeted towards the device being used.<br />
<br />
My home Internet was out for a week and my wife had to use her data plan for everything. We both made heavy use of her phone for FaceBook, reading the latest news, watching new YouTube posts. <br />
<br />
The data consumption was under 300MB that month. I can blow through that in one night on my computer doing nothing but browsing the web, no Media streaming, no file downloads.<br />
<br />
That is mostly because of ads. I now use ad-block for Chrome for other reasons, such as CPU usage, but at the time, I did not have that addon.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c492</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:41:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c492</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How google orders searches and what it does with previous search data has nothing to do with this company making personal data it shouldn't have even had searchable.<br />
<br />
You want any data related to you removed from google there is a button you can press to scrub yourself from their system. Otherwise if you don't want to give them access to the data you create you can feel free not to use their free services.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>