<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Extend the hand of friendship.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c401</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:35:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c401</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Dogs will sometimes eat motions...right out of the cat's litter box.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ &quot;Oh, you didn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c797</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:33:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c797</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[But he didn't spend 100 million doing it, so obviously it doesn't count. /s]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Chewbacca Defense</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c387</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:33:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c387</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Spank it! Spank it quick!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Press conference - Sheriff Donny Youngblood discusses Silva case</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c892</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:31:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c892</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c188</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:30:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c188</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[By the way, what is it with this sudden popularity of the # sign anyway?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Extend the hand of friendship.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c371</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zem]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:29:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c371</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[These guys need our help. It's time we extended the hand of friendship and remind them of the excuses that always worked in the past. I will go first.<br />
<br />
"Your honour, the dog ate my motion"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c166</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darryl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:28:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c166</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Are you sure the second can has a 6 on it?  The can just might be upside down.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>New name...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c163</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ahow628]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:26:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c163</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Saw someone on Twitter say they should change their name to Magic Asshat...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c161</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:25:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c161</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And the call ends up being answered at the White House.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1827</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:22:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1827</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>I read "Nowhere do the charges even attempt to show any specific *criminal* infringement." as "Nowhere in the charges are there any evidence presented to support specific criminal infringement". And there isn't.<br />
<br />
He didn't say "He is not being charged with specific *criminal* infringement". If he did, you'd have a point, also the subject has been discussed extensively when his indictment was news.</i><br />
<br />
I read it as him denying that there's any specific criminal infringement shown, emphasis on "criminal." That count of the indictment shows specific criminal infringement. It's criminal under Section 506(a)(1)(C) even though it's only one film.<br />
<br />
The text of the indictment demonstrates some of the evidence behind the charge:<blockquote>On or about October 25, 2008, VAN DER KOLK uploaded an infringing copy of a copyrighted motion picture entitled "Taken 2008 DVDRip Repack [A Release Lounge H264 By Micky22].mp4" to Megaupload.com and e-mailed the URL link for the file to another individual. An infringing copy of this copyrighted work was still present as of October 27, 2011, on a server in the Eastern District of Virginia controlled by the Mega Conspiracy.</blockquote>The allegation is that Bram van der Kolk uploaded it personally. The others are alleged to be accomplices (that's the 18 U.S.C. 2 bit in the text I quoted above). Accomplices are treated as though they committed the act themselves. Thus, all are charged with specific CRIMINAL infringement. This is shown and alleged in the indictment. <br />
<br />
I'd love to hear why Mike thinks otherwise, but I suspect, as per ALWAYS, he's gone now (or you're him), and we won't get any answer from him directly. Why he can't discuss and/or admit this stuff puzzles me no end. It's OK to admit that something is alleged and shown in the indictment. But for some reason he has to defend and protect Kim and the Gang. Wonder why...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1812</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:22:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1812</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>He denied it just two weeks ago:</em><br />
<br />
Except that the entire focus of the article was on the <strong>aiding and abetting</strong> charges. In order to show that Megaupload "aided and abetted" criminal infringement <em>done by their users,</em> they have to show that <em>a specific user</em> committed criminal infringement.<br />
<br />
And they have not done that. So, Mike is entirely correct.<br />
<br />
Separately, that specific allegation - even if true - probably doesn't rise to the level of <em>criminal</em> infringement. But that allegation was not the basis of the <em>aiding and abetting</em> charges, so it's irrelevant to that discussion.<br />
<br />
So, once again, you have shown that <em>you</em> are the one that is "slimy and dishonest" (your words).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Would you go far as &quot;Spying Is Bad, Period&quot;?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c56</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:21:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c56</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[trollololol]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c782</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:20:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c782</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nobody took away freedom of speech from the douchebag in the above video.<br />
<br />
This is an entirely moronic article.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ &quot;Oh, you didn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c776</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[S. T. Stone]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:20:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c776</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>What's the big deal?</i><br />
<br />
I]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ &quot;Oh, you didn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c755</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[S. T. Stone]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:19:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c755</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>if the DMCA notices were truly bogus, he'll have a good claim and he can even sue</i><br />
<br />
How many people have successfully filed (and won) a lawsuit against someone who filed a false DMCA claim for doing just that?<br />
<br />
How much did those people receive in terms of a monetary reward for damages incurred by the illegitimate DMCA claims?<br />
<br />
The filmmaker has a full right to file a counterclaim and I hope he does. That doesn]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ &quot;Oh, you didn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c742</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:17:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c742</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bullshit. Here are some facts for you:<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100712/23482610186.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100712/23482610186.shtml</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Would you go far as &quot;Spying Is Bad, Period&quot;?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c48</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:17:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c48</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I doubt it. A general statement would put Google into the picture, as it's the biggest spy agency around.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c364</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[sophisticatedjanedoe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:15:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c364</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[For the record, I'm very sympathetic to those 14, mainly due to a huge disproportionality of the punishment they have been receiving (even before the trial or judgement). <br />
<br />
So I just made a gift to Nazaire: next time you, Jacques, can build your pleading on the fact that the owner of a blog critical to your (fake) client and your scumbag masters expressed sympathy to evil hackers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ &quot;Oh, you didn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c732</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:14:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c732</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>And if the DMCA notices were truly bogus, he'll have a good claim and he can even sue.</blockquote><br />
Good one, Bob. You may be a terrible demagogue, but you sure are a funny comedian.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1800</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:12:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1800</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>It isn't difficult.</em><br />
<br />
...is one of average_joe's favorite go-to lines. (As is "on the merits.")<br />
<br />
Could there be sock puppetry at work here?<br />
<br />
I don't know, but it wouldn't surprise me, since 1. AJ has admitted he posts anonymously, 2. he has proven to be fundamentally dishonest, and 3. he's the only person in the universe who honestly believes he's ever won a debate with Mike.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>