<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Stands to Reason</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c60</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nigel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:45:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c60</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["removal of intermediaries" would mean them of course.  As they provide no additional or inherent value other than to restrict when and how folks can watch stuff I fail to see the problem.  <br />
<br />
Nevermind their checkbooks of course.<br />
<br />
At least the tone of the piece was civil.<br />
<br />
Nigel]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c36</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:44:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c36</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The sad part is, despite it being an essay, it'll still be treated as fact and "research."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>SMITH IS A MASSIVE FRAUD</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120920/00591220442/entrepreneur-magazine-sued-allegedly-defrauding-trademark-office.shtml#c831</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[rick c]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:44:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120920/00591220442/entrepreneur-magazine-sued-allegedly-defrauding-trademark-office.shtml#c831</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I dislike Entrepreneur's attacks on small business. I'm a small business owner who had to change my name also. But Scoot Smith isn't doing another any favors at all. In fact he is making things worse for us. I don't know what's going through he mind. His company's website isn't active at all. You would think a so called entrepreneur would actually be ONE. Does anyone know what he has actually done for the last 15 years but whine and sue and loose? In court papers he actually states that Bizstarz has NO VALUE!!!!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>So what's your precious Pandora EXCEPT gatekeeper?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c25</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:42:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c25</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That forces you to listen to ads, doesn't let you skip more a few, OR you can pay to avoid that? It's worse than radio!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c756</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:42:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c756</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why? Too many facts for you to deal with?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c110</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:41:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c110</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Any other job pulling this kind of shit would result in immediate termination.  <br />
<br />
In the police world, there are either no consequences or they are put on a "PAID" vacation.. er Suspension.<br />
<br />
I understand they have a job that can't be good for their mental health, they don't exactly get to deal with happy people everywhere they go, but this is just unacceptable.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c740</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:40:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c740</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Then what was the point to the DOJ's case?<br />
Now that the servers have been wiped, isn't the case dead?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c735</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:37:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c735</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The ironic thing is that even if the DOJ loses, the DOJ wins. I think the plan all along was to ruin Kim's business by whatever means possible. Getting Kim convicted would have been the icing on the cake, but it was never the main objective. The MAFIAA got its cake, the DOJ got its money and everyone is happy. Except for Kim and those who lost their legitimate files.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c91</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:36:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c91</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[did the NSA have tabs on this? how did they manage to commit this crime under their watchful surveillance eye? i suppose the answer will be that it wasn't worth the attention, in which case WHY DID THE ACTIVITIES OF MILLIONS OF ORDINARY PEOPLE WARRANT IT?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>What's in a name</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c730</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spaceman Spiff]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:34:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c730</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think it should be renamed "The Department of Just Us", since it's staff seems to believe that only they can determine the law...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c727</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:32:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c727</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You do realize that the judge didn't agree that there was any evidence on those servers that needed to be saved, right? How could this hurt the DOJ's case, Mike?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Oh, I doubt the mythical exculpatory evidence!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c717</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:32:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c717</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ever heard of innocent until proven guilty you chucklefuck? <br />
<br />
What about the right to a fair trial? <br />
<br />
Nah, didn't think that facts have anything to do with your bullshit troll posts on techdirt.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c703</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bergman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:30:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c703</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lack of funds is irrelevant when dealing with evidence of a crime.  Which is more expensive, keeping a few backups or going to prison for 5-10 years for evidence tampering?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1262</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:28:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1262</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm your huckleberry.<br />
<br />
"The evidence is that the Article III judges who looked at the evidence said it was relevant."<br />
<br />
No, the third-hand report given in three layers of double-speak from politicians who skipped the actual briefing "is that the judges who looked at "it" said it was relevant.' <br />
<br />
There is NO evidence. There are secrets. Faith-based?  We're the skeptics here.  You're the one believing the unsupported, baldly equivocated, constantly conflicting and confused reports of politicians who don't actually even know what happened but who want you to be sure that everything is okay.  Faith-based my ass!<br />
<br />
And yes, when they have gotten ALL the data, the 0.03% rejection rate is plenty good enough proof that the review process is bullshit.  <br />
<br />
When a US Senator can say, "here's MY phone, you have MY data, what facts supported what reasonable suspicion relevant to what investigation led you to be able to get MY contact list?" and you can't give him an answer because "Um, er, uh, the terrorists might get us if I answer that, Mr. Senator" then yes, it's all bullshit.<br />
<br />
That's not milk.  That's meat.  Suck on it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c541</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:28:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c541</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's strange. There seems to be no way of adding comments. Perhaps a little one-sided, I feel. It all looks like someone who is totally desperate because nobody is actually listening to the ravings of a blithering idiot. There also seems to more than just a hint of paranoia creeping in here. Perhaps a visit to a psychiatrist would the order of the day OOTB, before you burn yourself out with all this totally unjustified venom? I would hope that the abuse facility will be well-used.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c290</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:27:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c290</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not quite. There are three levels of classification and clearances.<br />
1. Confidential - boring.<br />
2. Secret - slightly less boring and easily attained.<br />
3. Top Secret - more involved to attain, only gives access to Top Secret material on a need to know basis.<br />
<br />
So Top Secret is the highest level of classification. Of course, there may be a higher, undocumented classification, but you'd have to have a Top to know about it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c683</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:27:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c683</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This post is so full of fail that it's comical.<br />
<br />
39?<br />
<br />
Lol]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Oh, I doubt the mythical exculpatory evidence!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c670</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bergman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:26:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c670</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's not the government's job to get convictions at all costs, especially if they have to frame someone to do it.  There is a reason the department is called the Department of JUSTICE.<br />
<br />
When one side or the other in a court case destroys evidence, it's called spoliation of evidence.  Doing so weakens the DOJ's case against Dotcom.<br />
<br />
If you're rooting for the government in this, why cheer when they shoot themselves in the foot?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ten to Twenty BILLION?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c517</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uriel-238]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:25:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c517</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Well, it is said that the number of FISA orders range from 10-20 billion per year*.</i><br />
<br />
WTF are they doing? Sending multiple orders to each and every person on the planet?<br />
<br />
Why haven't I gotten mine?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1089</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:24:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1089</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You see, this is why you guys are so pathetic and will never change a single person's viewpoint so long as you keep up these tactics. You start with stupid attacks that really have nothing to do with the article other than try to deflect attention. You base whatever arguments you have on a random assumption for which you have no proof. People in the know refute your claim, people who have no problem revealing their identities, giving them even more credibility.<br />
<br />
An honest person with a real argument would either admit they were mistaken and either concede the argument or argue why it doesn't matter. They would present facts to the contrary (if the other people responding were lying or mistaken) or explain why your point still stands. Instead, you double down on the idiocy, trying again to deflect from proven points while attempting to pretend that you weren't actually proven wrong. You present opinion, clearly not based on any real factual data. But, the evidence is there for all to see that you are wrong.<br />
<br />
Plus, you know what the best thing about all this is? Even if you had been 100% correct about your assertions about Mike and this site, that wouldn't change the actions of Fox. You have neither attempted to defend nor justify Fox's actions, only to try to push attention elsewhere. Had Techdirt been shown as equally bad, Fox would still have been in the wrong here. Even if you had achieved a score on Techdirt, the fact remains that one of the major corporations whose every move you support are the bad guys.<br />
<br />
This is why your arguments fail. Not only are you unable to respond to any criticisms of the corporations you endlessly worship with anything resembling truth, you can't even attack others properly in your defence. Try relying on facts, evidence and reasoned opinions next time, if you're capable of such things.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>