<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a joke</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/12373623425/mpaas-chris-dodd-will-be-chair-free-speech-week.shtml#c1512</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:38:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/12373623425/mpaas-chris-dodd-will-be-chair-free-speech-week.shtml#c1512</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Use a 1 pixel invisible image named to create a unique CID and use that for tracking LoL<br />
<br />
There are other ways too, that don't involve the IP address or could be used with the IP address, so you can block just one individual from one IP address once he is flagged assuming he keeps using the same CID..<br />
<br />
This of course would just make him more sad<br />
<br />
There are ways to track people anonymously they are not very robust but there are ways, besides AJ is tech illiterate so he will fall for it and will not understand how is that people are tracking him.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: AC and rdd.me</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c233</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[dante866]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:35:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c233</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, you're real tough there...posting as a guest on pastebin?  and you're calling mike a coward?<br />
<br />
get your yellow-bellied ass off the net, you're making our other AC's look bad...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c170</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:32:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c170</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>Jesus, AJ has completely broken down this past week.</i></blockquote><br />
No, bud.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mike and Tolles against AG investigating Google for antitrust.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c167</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:32:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c167</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[From the Google link: "Texas' AG was <b>"investigating" Google for antitrust violations"</b> -- NOTHING CAME OF IT, evidently (or Mike would run it endlessly), but these two pro-Googlers are against the very investigation, and pooh-pooh any basis for it because Google's targets were too small.<br />
<br />
Tolles dropped something he calls the "priority review program", which sounds like paid shilling. But he doesn't admit anything could be wrong with it. And Mike as usual claims it didn't gain much money. -- That's one of Mike's standard defenses: unless you're really raking it in (much more than millionaire Kim Dotcom, manifestly), then obviously all is perfectly legal.<br />
<br />
Anyhoo, when more than one AG comes after you, it's just possible that you're engaged in fairly obvious fiddling. So I don't at all believe Mike and his pal Tolles there.<br />
<br />
Nor here. Mike has the view that statute is a shield, that it legalizes what's against common law, where I see statute as ALWAYS suspect, an instrument made by criminals for criminals, and usually against the public good. Mike doesn't do common law or morality: he's railing here against "moral panics", one of his standard phrases.<br />
<br />
And Mike is always looking for ways that obvious criminality can be shielded or excused. Thus, his position that "safe harbor" protects file hosts with obvious infringed content on their site, and from which they gain money.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c802</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jingoi]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:31:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c802</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't give 50 shits what they claim they've stopped, find a different way to stop these "terrorists", stop wasting money on bullshit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Typo in headline</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c166</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:31:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c166</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How does one "Want To Special Exception"?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c211</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Burkhardt]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:30:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c211</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Nothing in this Motion is intended to confirm or deny that Google has received any order or orders issued by this Court.<br />
Of course, that might lead some to suggest that Google can't actually have standing, but there's an interesting legal argument here. Basically, Google is arguing that the perception that it's opened up its network to the NSA, as suggested in various reports, and which it cannot refute fully without revealing some details of FISA orders it has received, has caused it harm"<br />
<br />
Actually, its posible that by confirming they receive FISA requests (and specifically FISA requests) they would actually violate the gag order and therefore be sanctioned without the merits of the case ever being debated.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c187</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:27:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c187</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's worse than that.<br />
He's acting like a child throwing a temper tantrum.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>An Idea Obviously NOT Thought Through</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c163</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[sehlat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:26:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c163</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because if they get that, it would only make sense to hold them responsible for every crime that happens in their jurisdiction, whether they even knew of it or not. After all, it's *their* jurisdiction...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c131</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rapnel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:24:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c131</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright. I am so very, very disappointed. <br />
<br />
We need to redefine the lengths and eliminate the distortions of "for limited Times".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Beyond the Pale</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c144</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[osama'; drop table NSA_SECRETS; --]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:24:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c144</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's hilarious! But very true.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c168</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yeah right]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:24:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c168</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Your first link worked.<br />
<br />
You are using the tactics of a person who has lost the argument.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c119</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:20:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c119</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Less-than-Average-Joe, Still not going to show proof that you do not cheat on your exams? <br />
<br />
Guess this proves that you cheat on all of your exams.<br />
<br />
Go on, run away to another post and hide.<br />
<br />
LOSER]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Someone needs to investigate...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130615/01513723485/copyright-troll-lawsuit-ends-badly-because-very-dumb-defendant-lied-to-court-destroyed-evidence.shtml#c943</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[sophisticatedjanedoe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:11:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130615/01513723485/copyright-troll-lawsuit-ends-badly-because-very-dumb-defendant-lied-to-court-destroyed-evidence.shtml#c943</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is always suspicious when such incredible luck strikes a troll (instead of a well-deserved lightning :) ... yet since I watched this case carefully, I'm pretty sure there was no foul play. Lipscomb is smarter than Steele, but not smart enough to pull such machination. I read all the Doe 16's motions (attny Ron Smith) and there is simply no way they could be faked.<br />
<br />
Lots and lots of Lipscomb's douchebaggery took place during these months, and I'm stunned that he emerged unpunished. But we did not forget, and certainly did not forgive.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c489</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDAR]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:09:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c489</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At first read, I did not to find any issues with your piece, Mike, if I may call you by your first name. However, on second read, I noticed the words "this opportunity" in the quote you pulled out of Chamber's statement. This phrase seemed unconnected with anything you quoted. So I reluctantly opened their statement myself, and lo and behold, in context, this phrase actually makes sense. This is what was omitted from your quote:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>With a young population where over half a billion people are under 25 years old, Bollywood as well as Hollywood are experiencing growth that may be far outpacing the Indian economy. With an eager and growing workforce and multiplying diaspora overseas, creative content may edge its way up to be India</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c111</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:08:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c111</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What do certain people not want you to see?<br />
<br />
This! <a href='http://v.gd/3K4FAn' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://v.gd/3K4FAn</a><br />
<br />
So scared of the truth! It's totally awesome!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c413</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:08:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c413</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What do certain people not want you to see?<br />
<br />
This! <a href='http://v.gd/3K4FAn' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://v.gd/3K4FAn</a><br />
<br />
So scared of the truth! It's totally awesome!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c145</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:08:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c145</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What do certain people not want you to see?<br />
<br />
This! <a href='http://v.gd/3K4FAn' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://v.gd/3K4FAn</a><br />
<br />
So scared of the truth! It's totally awesome!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c99</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nigel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:08:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c99</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Seriously bro, go sit in the corner and let the adults talk.  You are a complete idiot. <br />
<br />
Nigel]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c84</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:07:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c84</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi Mike!<br />
<br />
Work those sockpuppets while trying to save face, but whatever you do, don't address the merits of anything I say.<br />
<br />
Attack the person! It's the only thing you know!<br />
<br />
Good on ya!<br />
<br />
LOL!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>