<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Only a days work</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c50</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:31:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c50</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think it was John who claimed to be making 10k per day from this scheme. <br />
If that is true he ought to just pay this before people look deeper into this. ....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c626</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:29:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c626</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[More like demonocracies.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c625</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loki]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:29:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c625</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Unless you are a lobbyist working on TPP, part of Congress, or part of the DOJ/ICE/FBI, then I'd say yes, you didn't get the memo.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c544</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:25:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c544</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And if Johnny jumped off a cliff...?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c43</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessie]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:23:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c43</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I can see it now:<br />
<br />
"I'm sorry, AF Holdings just filed for bankruptcy right after selling off our copyrights to our other....I mean another company."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c612</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loki]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:22:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c612</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It most certainly is not a nuance. There are no "subtle difference" between copyright, patent, and trademark. They are all broad, defined subsets of IP law. It's like saying someone doesn't understand the "nuances of government" for getting India, the US, and the UK mixed up because all three are democracies.<br />
<br />
I don't expect everyone to understand the distinctions of IP law (and if everyone did, there'd be no real reason to write about it), but I do expect people who write about such things professionally to get their facts right. Just as I would expect them to do if they were informing me about maritime law]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c589</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:20:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c589</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright...patent...all a bunch of crap. So in that sense, they are the same.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Law is for Lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c582</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:19:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c582</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Of course you should know the difference. And some large percentage of the time, some large percentage of the reporters in the world get it mostly right.<br />
<br />
This article impugns the entire media organization as if this is some grand fucking systematic failure of the entire enterprise.<br />
<br />
It is far more likely that some junior reporter put this in and the editorial staff was short handed because one person was on vacation and one person got sick the day this article hit the desk. Is that newsworthy?<br />
<br />
This is the Techdirt mentality: if anyone in a big huge organization makes a mistake or does something stupid, it is cast as a failure of the whole organization, all of its leadership, and culture as a whole.<br />
<br />
The plural of anecdote is not data. You have absolutely zero idea about how this mistake was made, who reviewed the article, how it slipped through the cracks, nothing. You have speculation at best. Yet you feel free to write a whole article of your own about it. So you don't need facts  because why... they are "journalists" and you are just a blogger?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c997</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:17:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c997</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i></i></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Law is for Lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c578</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh Beadon]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:10:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c578</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Have you ever been anywhere close to a working editor or journalist, or set foot in a respectable newsroom? If not, it would be a real eye-opener for you. The culture of journalism is not at all what you picture, and you'd be laughed out of the building for your "total accuracy is impossible and mistakes are no big deal" philosophy.<br />
<br />
Yes, mistakes get made. And then they get pointed out. And the journalists who make the fewest mistakes rise to the top over time. There's no room for your laissez-faire attitude towards facts, and you'll find very little support for it among the very people you think you're defending.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Steal... sharing... all the same at Techdirt.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c559</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loki]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:08:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c559</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If enough people believe it to be true, the difference is largely irrelevant for practical terms.<br />
<br />
I don't blame the AFP, as much as I blame the entertainment industry. For years they've been conflating ideas and terminology as part of their "education" (and what they mean by "education" everyone else defines as disinformation), and getting the government to go along with them.<br />
<br />
Given one of the key targets of these "education" programs has been news agencies, it really isn't all that hard to see how they can often get things wrong (after all, who would understand IP rules better than the people who rely on them for their livlihood, right?). Hell, even Adam Savage, whom Techdirt has written about before for his serious interest in IP matters, recently got some of the terminology wrong.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bogus</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c642</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violated]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:06:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c642</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Their claim that the cell phone could have been a gun is totally bogus and they know it. You can see from their own behaviour that they had zero concerns about threat to their own lives where they just saw it as a phone and where they did not want to be recorded.<br />
<br />
Had they really thought a gun then they would soon draw their own handguns while ordering them down on the ground spread eagle style.<br />
<br />
So all we have here is abuse of the law to censor. You would think cops would want to teach a bunch of kids better lessons in this high technology world.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Law is for Lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c547</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:05:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c547</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That is a fine expectation. It's not just unrealistic, it is downright delusional especially to expect it to be true 100% of the time or anywhere close. Have you ever had anything you did personally reported upon? If not, it would be a real eye-opener for you. It's usually right in principle but rarely in the details, I've found.<br />
<br />
Your sense of the importance of this incident is way way out of proportion.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/00583723201/if-you-thought-copyright-was-mess-earth-what-does-it-look-like-space.shtml#c240</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:01:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/00583723201/if-you-thought-copyright-was-mess-earth-what-does-it-look-like-space.shtml#c240</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Its is not only the Inventions that are held in limbo, but also the people who fail to obtain an education because of the price of textbooks, and the inability of people to translate them into native languages.<br />
The Internet could make all the worlds knowledge and culture available to whoever wants it at near zero cost. The fact this is being prevented by greedy middlemen is a tragedy. Not only does it leave people in ignorance, it also leaves them dependent on the west for solutions to their problems.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12122823187/guy-sues-twitter-taking-away-his-twitter-handle.shtml#c119</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nastybutler77]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:00:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12122823187/guy-sues-twitter-taking-away-his-twitter-handle.shtml#c119</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Not liking something that a company does isn't a reason to sue.</i> <br />
<br />
I guess it is when your spouse is an attorney.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130315/15285222343/bad-move-google-removes-adblock-plus-google-play-store.shtml#c3430</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[syle]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:56:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130315/15285222343/bad-move-google-removes-adblock-plus-google-play-store.shtml#c3430</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The problem isn't so much the advertisments, people need to eat, if its on the tv I turn it off but my personal phone that I need, I have a family I need my phone to be a phone and I don't need the pop ups to interfere with important matters, honestly when the advertisers or whom ever is allowing all this crap to go on and expect us to just take it need to pay my bill than they can send whatever they want. the average person cant harass anyone without the law in the way but advertisers have a pass card that allows them to harass, wtf.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c617</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:54:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c617</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ooooh, you get my creative juices flowing. Exterior clothing designed to obscure your cellphone, yet allow free video recording of events to the front of your chest. Oooh, oooh, for the multi phoned person, a pocket in each direction. Then one needs a voice controlled APP that auto-magically starts the recording and the upload (assuming connectivity) or separately stores the video in three or four places on your phone, encrypted and named for your first pet. Hmmm, where is my dual use copyright/patent application form. They will straighten out which bits go where for me, along with the rapid approvals.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>What happens when the musical chairs stop?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c25</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:53:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c25</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh the fun of musical chairs.  Or hot potato.<br />
<br />
Who is Prenda?<br />
Who owns Ingenuity123?<br />
Who owns AFHoldings?<br />
Who is the actual plaintiff?<br />
Who owns the copyright?<br />
Who represents who?<br />
Who controls what?<br />
Who gets paid how much?<br />
<br />
Oh, it's not me, your honor!  It's someone else.  I just show up in court, or collect checks, but I don't make any decisions.  I take orders from someone else who also is not a decision maker.  Ultimately this all happens by itself.  There is no top.  There is nobody who makes decisions, controls or is responsible for all of this.  While the Alan Cooper signature may be a forgery to give us the ability to later claim fraudulent copyright transfer, nobody actually signed it.  And that Salt Marsh thing?  He signs things, but the documents are quantum -- they do not exist when a court wants to see them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c844</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[alanbleiweiss]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:52:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c844</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because its  an opportunity for Google to help improve the securing of private information on the web. Since they already take proactive steps in other areas to improve security online, why not here? <br />
<br />
For example - they proactively block sites their system detects that have malware or viruses.  They don't have to. Its the responsibility of site owners to ensure their sites don't have malware or viruses baked in.  Yet Google has chosen to help. <br />
<br />
This is no different.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Your Thoughts Have Been Copyrighted by Disney</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/00583723201/if-you-thought-copyright-was-mess-earth-what-does-it-look-like-space.shtml#c219</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:51:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/00583723201/if-you-thought-copyright-was-mess-earth-what-does-it-look-like-space.shtml#c219</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I actually wrote an essay about this:<br />
<br />
	If you think about Mickey Mouse, are you infringing Disney's copyright?  What if you willfully memorize a copyrighted poem?  Think hard; the answer could be worth $150,000 in court. <br />
	According to the law, copyright protects]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>