<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c70</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:14:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c70</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wow, you guys really obsess over these guys. You do realize that there's all kinds of dirtbags out there who do way worse things, right?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Do you know the Difference between a theory and a hypothesis?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c329</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:11:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c329</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Given the level of actual science present in this guy's work, I'd say it's safe to say that the article is using the colloquial meaning of theory rather than the scientific one.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Just go ALL PRENDA, ALL THE TIME.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c50</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:11:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c50</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's the TechPrenda show.. every child player wins a prize.<br />
<br />
Roll up, Roll up.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c22</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[rw]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:09:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c22</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[More Terrorism by cops!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>just love you command of english</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c33</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:08:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c33</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>Either way, without a court reporter, Matthew Sparby, who was in attendance, wrote up the following first-hand account of what happened in the court room.</b><br />
<br />
WTG Techdope]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akari Mizunashi]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:03:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[These 6 students should be lucky they weren't using Super Soakers.<br />
<br />
We'd be burying 6 students.<br />
<br />
Police States of America, coming to your local neighborhood! Misleading News at 11!<br />
<br />
/ugh]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Just go ALL PRENDA, ALL THE TIME.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c10</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:59:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c10</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I can see that it might be of interest about once a week, but clearly your mania is due to the copyright related aspects and your notion that a few bad lawyers should mean end all copyright.<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>Take a loopy tour of <b>Techdirt.com!</b> You always end up same place!</i><br />
<a href='http://techdirt.com/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/</a><br />
ZOMG! Yet another item on Prenda Law! A staple in the <i>soporific</i> "At The Bench" series. Mike sez (short version): <b>"Wow. Wow. Wow. ... The story is gripping.</b>"<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130303/23353022182/prenda-law-sues-critics-defamation.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130303/23353022182/prenda-law-sues-critics-defamation.shtml</a><br />
<i>03:58:55[d-365-1]</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Lock version 2.0</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080717/1932251716.shtml#c1692</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chubb Locksmiths]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:58:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080717/1932251716.shtml#c1692</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Haha - it'd make our job a lot easier if they did this.<br />
<br />
Being a Locksmith in Birmingham isn't easy - every day there's lock pickings and lock bumping to deal with... but if geeks want to pick a few locks and earn us a few extra jobs, we won't complain!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1830</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:58:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1830</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>And, yet again, AJ shows why responding to him is a waste of time. He made a statement that was clearly false, and I pointed it out. Rather than admit his error, he continued the attack and moved the goalposts. Then he thinks it makes sense to yell at me because I won't respond to his ridiculous assertions?<br />
<br />
This is why there is no discussing anything with you on the merits. You employ logical fallacies like you invented them, and you constantly move the goalposts.</i><br />
<br />
I didn't move the goalposts. You said "copyrights," and I assumed you meant the rights granted to copyright holders under the Copyright Act--which is a reasonable interpretation of the word. You appear to be limiting your claim to some subset of those rights. That's fine. The word "copyrights" can be construed differently, and my construction differed from yours. No big deal. But you still have not answered my question: What do you mean by "copyrights." You're pretending like it's my fault I don't know what you mean when you haven't bothered to explain what you mean by your use of the word.<br />
<br />
Regardless, I've asked you to address my point this proposal would indeed weaken the copyright rights, defined broadly as including the anticircumvention rights under 1201, of copyright holders. You have not addressed this question. Nor have you addressed the point I've made repeatedly in the comments that if you meant by "copyrights" only the exclusive rights under Section 106, then this proposal would weaken those rights as well because making it legal to traffic in technologies that can be used to circumvent access controls would make it easier to infringe. Those controls exist for the purpose of protecting the rights under Section 106. If those controls are weakened, then that in turn weakens the protection of the Section 106 rights. The fact that it would still be illegal to violate the 106 rights ignores the fact that it would be easier to do so.<br />
<br />
Now, instead of pulling out your usual trope about "temper tantrums" and "moving the goalposts," why don't you actually discuss these actual issues on the merits? Seriously, Mike. Grow a fucking pair and discuss something like a man. Stop running away all the time. It's fucking ridiculous.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Do you know the Difference between a theory and a hypothesis?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c316</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffry Houser]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:57:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c316</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A theory is the most complete understanding science has based on the available facts. <br />
<br />
A hypothesis is a guess that hasn't been proved yet.<br />
<br />
Sounds like you're using 'theory' in this article when you mean 'hypothesis'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c476</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Groove Tiger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:54:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c476</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was about to complain about drones being too low but then I took a drone to the knee.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c778</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:53:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c778</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[John -er- I mean Nora, are you trolling again. Looks like having to settle with Nyugen  to keep from getting sanction in that case has made you a tad upset.<br />
<br />
Maybe Nora is just worried that Steele is going to take the big fall, since it's Gibbs, Duffy and Hansmeier who are all referred to their various State Bars and could have a variety of things happen with their licence to practice law while Steele escapes that happening to him.<br />
<br />
Could be Nora is a little worried that Gibbs, Duffy, Hansmeier or Lutz could always turn into a witness of a RICO case came down.<br />
<br />
Obviously Nora is worried that the others could strike a deal and maybe extract a little revenge for their careers being in tatters while Steele escaped without any penalties from the State Bar(s) he belongs to.<br />
<br />
Must weigh on Nora's mind a lot that there is the possibility that with a possible RICO case, someone from the group could flip, with the IRS Criminal Division case someone could flip.<br />
<br />
Of course this is Hypothetical for now, but we'll have to see what happens.<br />
<br />
John -er- I mean Nora, you seem to know a lot of graphic details of what goes on in various porn acts, you must watch a lot of it]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c309</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bengie]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:53:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c309</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have to agree, was epic.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c239</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:53:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c239</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>Male parta, male dilabuntur.</b><br />
<br />
<i>Things ill gotten slip away in evil ways.</i><blockquote>Cicero, Philippica II, 44 B.C.</blockquote>My money is on...there is no more money.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c291</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark Helmet]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:51:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c291</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Um, violent crime is waaaaaay down in America in general, and mass shootings are at worst level and at best slightly on the decline.  Don't let media coverage fool you....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: According to..</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c454</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:50:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c454</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And, yes, that would restrict low flying drones to following the roadways which is a perfectly reasonable limitation which does not interfere with their usefulness.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>I don't get this...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c443</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Titania Bonham-Smythe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:48:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c443</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If someone hovered a drone outside my bedroom window I'd knock their block off!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: According to..</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c434</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:47:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c434</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Do drones qualify as 'aircraft', and do we want them to?<br />
<br />
I think a simpler solution would be to expand property lines to include a bubble 50 or 100 feet above the ground making it possible to trespass even while hovering above the ground. Then simple trespass laws take it from there. Including the property owner's option to permit or deny entry as desired, and the ability of authorities to override those limits if needed.<br />
<br />
It's a matter of respect as much as anything else. Like anyone else they are welcome to take pictures from the roadway, but not from the window ledge.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Minecraft as empirical evidence of validity ...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c278</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[GMacGuffin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:47:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c278</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[1.  Minecraft is a violent video game.  You must kill mobs to survive.<br />
<br />
2.  My best friend likes a high-res Minecraft texture pack and is hell bent on killing mobs. I stick with a 64x res pack and hide from mobs in a hole at night.  <br />
<br />
3.  He sometimes gets drunk and wants to start a fight.  I do not.<br />
<br />
Therefore, using hi-res texture packs on the violent game of  Minecraft has been shown to make people more violent than those who use lower res, video-card-heat-friendly texture packs.<br />
<br />
Proven.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Passerby - NOT a silly fight.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c336</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben S]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:45:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c336</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'll try to explain the purpose of the site for you.  Basically, Techdirt is about how new technologies can disrupt established industries, resulting in something that is overall good for the industry as a whole, yet seem harmful to the established players in those industries.  In particular, the attempts by those established players to try to block the new innovations and advancements in technologies.<br />
<br />
Due to regulatory capture causing copyright, as well as patent law, to go far beyond anything reasonable, copyright and the DMCA are frequent topics here.  The reason for this article is specifically the abuse of the takedown provisions of the DMCA, rather than the fight itself.  This is a clear and obvious attempt to silence free speech using the DMCA is the method, despite defenders of the takedown provisions claiming that nothing about copyright can or will harm free speech.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>