<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c799</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:33:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c799</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hahahaha.<br />
<br />
What Does Any Of That Have To Do With The Patent Being Granted?<br />
<br />
Reading Comprehension Fail.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c433</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:32:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c433</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's not. This move would essentially transofrm every fanfic into a 'work for hire' owned by Amazon. It's essentially a means of outsourcing independent writers to come up with ideas so that Amazon can then turn around and make a mint in the event that a studio wants to license a work.<br />
<br />
Baaaaaad idea.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c961</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:31:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c961</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>This use fails on the 4th factor of consideration...</i><br />
<br />
Oops. Worded that wrong. Didn't mean "fails". I meant that the 4th factor would support that this use is fair use.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bad legal move</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c791</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CFWoods]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:31:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c791</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Recipe for making you life much worse:<br />
<br />
- Have the government seize your funds<br />
<br />
- Threaten very large companies with an infringement suit if they don't pay you so you can defend yourself on another matter<br />
<br />
Reason:<br />
<br />
This invites a declaratory judgement action that you've already admitted you can't afford.<br />
<br />
*** shakes head ***]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c790</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:31:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c790</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>ust like OOTB. AJ doesn't actually read the entire article. Otherwise he would have noticed that Mike said it was a bad idea. It is much easier to make a stand when you take things out of context.</i><br />
<br />
Here's what mini-Masnick said about Dr. Evil:<br />
<br />
"That said, the threat of suing over a patent if they don't fund his defense seems like a potentially poorly thought out strategic move that could backfire. Remember, Dotcom has been hit with racketeering claims, and I would think that anything that implies "give me money or I'll sue" isn't the best move for someone already facing racketeering charges."<br />
<br />
That is in marked contrast from his usual bile over patent and copyright trolls he doesn't worship.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c781</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:30:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c781</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Did You Stop Reading Before The Last Paragraph?<br />
<br />
Thats The Only WAy To Comprehend Your Issues.<br />
<br />
Nice Selective Reading Skills.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c937</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:28:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c937</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> How is this any different?</i><br />
<br />
<br />
Mike already explained why he thought there is a strong fair use argument in the article:<br />
<blockquote><i>First of all, there's a tremendously strong fair use argument here. <b>Nothing in what Scroll Kit did with the video competed with the Snow Fall story in any way shape or form.</b> The video was just a demonstration of its product and how you could use it to create a Snow Fall like experience.</i></blockquote>This use fails on the 4th factor of consideration and does not "effect the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work."<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c760</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:28:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c760</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>What no one even bothered to consider is how the heck did he manage to get such a ridiculous patent?</i><br />
<br />
Simple. It's Kim Dotcom, so Mike has his blinders on. This site couldn't be any easier to understand. Pirate friends = good. Copyright enemies = bad. The details are unimportant.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c749</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:26:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c749</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Correct. Prior art on this exists for a very long time."<br />
<br />
If that was the case that prior art should have been patented, and Kim would not have been issued with the patent in the first place.<br />
<br />
Fact is!!! He was given a patent for it, and without any challenges to prior art, Kim would have also been required to do a patent search for prior art, as would the patent office.. That's how you get patents, and why patent searches when applying for a patent is necessary.<br />
<br />
So the argument of prior art does not even come into this case, oh btw: point to some prior art that has been patented that makes this patent void please.<br />
<br />
otherwise STFU, you don't know what your talking about.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yeah sounds like threats and racketeering!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c739</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shawn]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:25:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c739</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Want to buy the world wide license to my two-factor-authentication patent? (13 countries incl. US &amp; China)<br />
Email: <a href="mailto:twitter@kim.com"" rel="nofollow">twitter@kim.com"</a><br />
<br />
<a href='https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/337410056859566080' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/337410056859566080</a><br />
<br />
<br />
Very threatening language indeed!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c718</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:25:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c718</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Blackmail. Plain and simple.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c696</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:24:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c696</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What no one even bothered to consider is how the heck did he manage to get such a ridiculous patent? What patent office on crack approved this patent to begin with? I suppose no one even considers the question anymore, we all take for granted that the patent office approves the most bogus patents and so it's no longer even worth discussing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c28</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Best]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:21:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c28</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Or you could just, I don't know, not murder people.<br />
<br />
:P]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c673</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:20:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c673</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[yes, blatant extortion in public is generally a bad idea, you don't have to be a genius to work that out, see even Mick the nick can sort of work it out, but with his own version of reality spin.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Racketeering</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c661</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:19:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c661</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think he should have tried to sell the patent to one of them to fund the defense.  It probably would get more support.  It would have also shown that he never sued them for their infringement.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>what a freak, and freaking JOKE</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c654</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:18:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c654</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Extortion anyone, oh but wait, he is the focus of Masnicks Bromance, so it's ok.<br />
<br />
Masnick would not want to do anything to rock the boat of his love affair with Mr Kim. (Bow when you say his name).<br />
<br />
Lets watch Mick the nick dance this fine line between reality and Masnicks dream world.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c635</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:16:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c635</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just like OOTB.  AJ doesn't actually read the entire article.  Otherwise he would have noticed that Mike said it was a bad idea.  It is much easier to make a stand when you take things out of context.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c633</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:14:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c633</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i><blockquote>"There's a name for that."</blockquote></i><br />
Yes there is. It is called <b>leverage</b>. In this case, it may be improperly conceived and/or applied, but it is a very common practice in negotiation, everywhere.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c822</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:14:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c822</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is certainly a delay tactic, the police have the preliminary coroner's report pending the toxicology report. Regardless of what the guy was on, toxicology isn't the portion determining the extent of the physical trauma which infers how badly he was beaten. It shouldn't get those guys off the hook for manslaughter if the report says the victim died of unrelated cyanide poisoning if it also states that he had a brain hemorrhage, ruptured internal organs, and internal bleeding such that each of the other conditions would have caused death moments later as well.<br />
<br />
With three to four months there's a good chance a FOIA might get the prelimary out, and is using that in it's investigation if they are trying at all. I suggest using the FBI's results of recoving the videos as the measure of how hard they are trying, because if the phones were returned to the individuals working, the FBI most certainly can recover the videos.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Alternativly, the birth of 3 factor authenication</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c609</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AndyD273]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:13:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c609</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Who's gonna be the first to patent it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>