<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Minion, don't throw &quot;moral panics&quot; bit into actual police actions.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1109</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digdug]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:11:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1109</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think at this point most people don't even bother reading the post before hitting it, which is rather ironic.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c453</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digdug]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:04:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c453</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You realize you're as bad as the troll when you troll him right?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c434</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digdug]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:03:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c434</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I thought Wright's order to pay legal fees had that covered? Maybe she knew that and based her decision off of that. Don't want to double dip as it were.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c337</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:58:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c337</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bwahahahahaha... too funny!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c336</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:57:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c336</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Probably has the eggs packed up for that move to a non extradition country.<br />
<br />
Don't you worry John I am sure is sitting with his Barbie doll in the basement that has SJD scribbled on a post-it-note attached to it and sticking pins into it for revenge.<br />
<br />
John takes criticism well and always respects everyones opinion and has nothing but highest moral regard for the law...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: The story that just keeps on giving</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c316</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:55:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c316</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>They didn't piss off a bunch of judges. They have one judge</blockquote>So you've forgotten Florida, Minnesota and last week's appeals court already?  If your memory is that bad it's no wonder you're doing so poorly, John.  One of the first things about telling lies is that you need to <i>remember</i> who you told what to, otherwise you end up - well, you end up where you are right now.<blockquote>who is trying to bully</blockquote>You keep using that word.  I do not think it means what you think it means.<br />
<blockquote>being investigator, judge, and jury all in one.</blockquote>Yeah, just keep telling yourself that.  Maybe one day you'll believe it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>F-22</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c25</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:53:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c25</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The reason it takes 5 years to figure out is that the issue was the life support vest itself and not the aircraft.   Does the life support vest being used support the turn on a at dime Mach speed handling the F22 is capable of?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: GIbbs</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c310</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:52:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c310</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gibbs knows he is still in deep doo, he has a compliant before the state bar where a federal Judge has referred to a pattern of conduct unbecoming basically.<br />
<br />
Now on top if that Gibbs (who is supposedly out of work, but I still think he is working for Prenda) has this portion of 81k plus 1k a day that it is late.<br />
<br />
Gibbs had already turned over an affadavits in the Florida Sunlust vs Nyugen case where he basically singled out John "Teflon John" Steele &amp; Paul Duffy as the senior Prenda partners giving Gibbs his instructions on almost every aspect of the case.<br />
<br />
Gibbs in my estimation is the first Person I see State &amp; Federal Prosecutors going to for a deal after they get a grand jury indictment for RICO.<br />
<br />
Really what options does Gibbs have left? Prenda is throwing him under the bus, and basically saying he is incompetent and they had no idea that he was mis-handling this case and the courts directives.<br />
<br />
Gibbs job prospects are pretty well shot. Who is going to hire someone that was associated with Prenda and John Steele after everything that has come down through the courts and has been reported in the media.<br />
<br />
I see Gibbs being the first one to fold and give up everyone else, especially Teflon John. You have to remember that Gibbs will be lucky if he has a licence to chase ambulances when this is said and done.<br />
<br />
John still has his licence (miracle that is mind you) even though it may be inactive (Teflon John is supposedly retired but I think that may have been a forced retirement, but I highly doubt he is retired, I just think he practices under the radar ~nudge nudge wink wink~)<br />
<br />
I predict if the feds can bring down a RICO indictment there are going to be people scurrying for cover and striking a deal and I see Gibbs first up to save his ass and to extract a little revenge on Steele et all for hanging him out to dry.<br />
<br />
Time will tell of course this is just my opinion, but hey even I am entitled to dream!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1569</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmerl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:47:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1569</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>That seems a bit of a stretch. That's like saying my window and door locks only protect my windows and doors from opening, not the contents of my house. It's like saying my alarm system only indirectly protects my stuff.</i><br />
<br />
Bad comparison. If you want a valid analogy, you can compare the use case that involves DRM and DMCA to the owner of the house (end user) who goes to the store vendor (content owner) and buys a product (content). Product is copyrighted, so the vendor protects it (puts DRM on it). Protection entitles a spybot and electrified protective wrap which accompany the product to user's house.<br />
<br />
User comes home and attempts to use the product. Spybot which now spies on the user in user's own house notifies the user with red lights that most probably user is a criminal, lest use will attempt to duplicate the product. User tries to unwrap the product, but the sneaky wrap refuses to be removed and notifies the user that user can only peek through the wrap with special tool X from the vendor. User most probably doesn't even have a tool X, or has a tool Y, which doesn't really help.<br />
<br />
Now frustrated user finds a special tool Z which disables the annoying and potentially dangerous spy bot and its flashing lights and disintegrates the nasty wrap and then finally gets to the product.<br />
<br />
With all that, somewhere in background the Big Brother creates a rule which says "you can't disable the bot, you can't remove the wrap with any tool" and etc. It doesn't prevent one from doing it, but it forbids it. Makes a lot of sense, right?<br />
<br />
So in order to "protect" the product, the vendor created a privacy violating bot and really irritating wrap which user has to disintegrate first to get some sensible and comfortable user experience. But to scary users off from doing it, there is also a DMCA, which users view as lunacy, since they really need to disable the bot which is an outright spy for who knows whom and they need to remove the wrap, since they have no need to buy any ridiculous tool X - they already have tool Y.<br />
<br />
Bottom line - DMCA/1201 doesn't protect DRM and doesn't prevent its breaking. DRM itself is a crooked and unethical methodology which shouldn't even exist in the first place. Both should be gone of for good.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: The story that just keeps on giving</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c298</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:38:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c298</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The story you're trying to sell - that events exist without context, that judges should be uninformed and ignorant of related events pertinent to the matters before them - has been a key strategy of every IP troller. They rely on the fact that judges are as hard pressed to keep up with current events as everyone else. Working in perfect darkness, where they alone control the dialog, is the trollers' Platonic ideal.<br />
<br />
Prenda's operations have become so noisome they have been thrust into daylight. It is not "just one judge" now. So what would you call more than one judge? A bunch of judges? A posse of judges? A <i>banc</i> of judges? To Prenda &amp; Co., I imagine they are simply called: trouble.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c946</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not a Doe but I play one on TV]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:38:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c946</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi jonmon!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c283</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[sorrykb]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:31:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c283</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["But your honor, it's not FAIR! We gave the $81K to our boss Alan Cooper and he PROMISED to turn it in!"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c277</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[mudlock]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:27:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c277</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Typically in these cases, your talking about something like cobalt-60, which is a gamma emitter. Worse than x-rays, and considered "nuclear".<br />
<br />
Most famous wasn't a software error either. It was a scrap dealer who took apart a machine that he didn't know what it was, that never should have been scrapped, and killed 10 people.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111213/18060117071/actually-jobs-making-movies-are-rise-not-falling.shtml#c451</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:24:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111213/18060117071/actually-jobs-making-movies-are-rise-not-falling.shtml#c451</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I like turtles]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1558</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:21:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1558</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>This was because the PEOPLE didn't want it to be illegal.</i><br />
<br />
WELL...<br />
<br />
Technically speaking, people *DID* want it to be illegal, at first.<br />
<br />
However, people soon found out that their scapegoat of alcoholism being all of the problems of society was a falsehood and the fact that you had to now DEAL with them instead of being able to drink to try and forget them, even for a little bit, caused real issues.<br />
<br />
So now, people wanted alcohol to get away from problems, but it was illegal, so they started to make their own.<br />
<br />
And that was how organized crime came into being in the 1930s.<br />
<br />
Once alcohol was legal again, though, most of the organized crime either went away or moved onto something else.<br />
<br />
Huh...  I wonder if that should be applied to marijuana or something.<br />
<br />
Something to think about.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1545</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rikuo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:19:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1545</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, Mike is sooo chicken shit, he responded no less than 3 times to you at the time of writing this comment. <br />
Here's one way you can try and be taken more seriously. Don't say something so obviously false, that all anyone has to do to check its veracity is simply scroll up and down.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c271</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gothenem]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:18:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c271</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think that he is beneath Wal-Mart. In fact, Wal-Mart would take one look at him and say "Nope. This guy is not what we are looking for. He does not meet our standards."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1537</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:16:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1537</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And AJ has left feeling superior to everyone even though he lied his way through all the comments!<br />
<br />
Find out what happens next time on Techdirt, the ongoing chronicles!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1532</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rikuo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:15:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1532</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["The more difficult to use and underground something is, the less people will use it."<br />
<br />
Heard of a little thing called the Prohibition? It was a little thing, you might not have heard of it, but it was a period in the 1920's when you couldn't buy alcohol. Shocking, I know. The government went around saying it was illegal to buy beer, and punished anyone they could find.<br />
Guess what happened? Even though it technically was difficult to buy beer (you couldn't do so openly, you had to be circumspect about it, go through shady channels, basically some amount of effort) and it was underground by default seeing as how it was illegal...people still continued to drink. In large numbers. The US government threw 15,000 agents last I checked at this, and failed completely.<br />
This was because the PEOPLE didn't want it to be illegal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;$1k/day</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c248</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:15:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c248</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gibbs is still on the hook. What Judge Wright is doing is, as he says, a bit of housekeeping. Gibbs is apparently still on file as one of Prenda's attorneys in this case, despite apparently no longer being one of their attorneys. Wright was asking for him to formally file for withdrawing from the case as it's lawyer to straighten out that bit of oddness.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>