<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: ^Unprecedented QUAD POSTS! Hooray!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c177</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_my_ass]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:43:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c177</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[4x as many posts to report than usual.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c167</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:42:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c167</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm glad to see that prosecutorial overreach isn't just restricted to the US.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c688</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:37:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c688</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The drafts are public.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>^Unprecedented QUAD POSTS! Hooray!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c158</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:37:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c158</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Previously, clicking stop at obvious pause and clicking submit again has not resulted in multiples. Live and learn.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c674</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:35:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c674</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I said this before and I'll say it again:<br />
<br />
<b>They assume that the blind are not their market</b>.  Following this, the assumption is that allowing the blind an exemption to copyright is thus, a bad thing.<br />
<br />
Am I misreading that?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c142</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:34:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c142</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The way you defend pirates. Heh, heh.<br />
<br />
I'd agree with you on this one except for your constant defense of KNOWN criminals like infringer-millionaire Dotcom of Mega; this is just a minor squawk on your anti-copyright agenda.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c140</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:33:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c140</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is actions like this that have convinced me that copyright needs to be abolished. It is being used as a lever to destroy the Internet, and the politicians are not worried about this because it would remove a means that allows citizens to organize themselves.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c116</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:33:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c116</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The way you defend pirates. Heh, heh.<br />
<br />
I'd agree with you on this one except for your constant defense of KNOWN criminals like infringer-millionaire Dotcom of Mega; this is just a minor squawk on your anti-copyright agenda.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c110</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:33:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c110</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So Mike, is it your position that registrars should be able to register domain names to sites that they know are committing criminal acts? I'm trying to understand what the problem is here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c104</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:32:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c104</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The way you defend pirates. Heh, heh.<br />
<br />
I'd agree with you on this one except for your constant defense of KNOWN criminals like infringer-millionaire Dotcom of Mega; this is just a minor squawk on your anti-copyright agenda.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c87</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:31:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c87</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The way you defend pirates. Heh, heh.<br />
<br />
I'd agree with you on this one except for your constant defense of KNOWN criminals like infringer-millionaire Dotcom of Mega; this is just a minor squawk on your anti-copyright agenda.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c651</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:28:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c651</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote> He just pulls out that excuse when anyone challenges him to state a concrete position on copyright policy.</blockquote><br />
<br />
Actually, he pulls out that excuse when you've tried to badger him into answering an oversimplified, black-or-white, are-you-for-it-or-against-it question.<br />
<br />
His response has never been that he has no opinion. It's that he doesn't have the sort of binary opinion you demand.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c76</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[justok]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:19:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c76</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's the damn power companies! If it wasn't for them, infringers wouldn't see the light of night!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c632</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:17:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c632</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I am desensitized to it, having been attacked viciously over and over again by the folks on TD who can't stand it when their leader is challenged"<br />
<br />
Well yeah, I mean if I went to the West Boro Baptist church blog and made constant remarks about their Pasture instead of debating their perceptions of reality, I would expect the same kind of treatment.<br />
<br />
You're a big boy Joe, you should know that debating on a website that stands on the other side of the spectrum compared to your viewpoint is going to be difficult. Otherwise, why go through the trouble?<br />
<br />
"Address the merits of my post if you would: Do you agree that Mike has not even begun to back up his assertion that this is a "ridiculous letter with little basis in fact"? "<br />
<br />
Yes, but then there's little information to go on to say how this will affect international copyright in the long run. You can make the assumption it will damage the finances of all the companies Business Europe represents, or you can assume it will barely affect them.<br />
<br />
" Do you agree that Mike hasn't shown us the text of the proposal and explained why this response is bullshit?"<br />
<br />
He hasn't taken the time to dissect it yet, yes, but the focus of this article isn't that specific document, it's the letter that Business Europe sent out concerning the draft treaty.<br />
<br />
"Do you agree that Mike's purpose in writing this article was not to actually advance the debate in a positive way but was instead solely for the purpose of discrediting these people with his usual "they hate the blind!" trope?"<br />
<br />
Mike may interpret that these companies hate blind people, but that's absolutely an opinion, which makes this article an "opinion piece." If you are unable to distinguish opinion from reality, then I don't know what I can do for you.  <br />
<br />
"I feel like I added to the discussion by pointing out how Mike added nothing."<br />
<br />
You also made a bunch of accusations and insults...I don't see how that is at all conducive to any kind of discussion. If you really wanted to add to things, you could read the draft treaty here - <a href='https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=6&amp;ved=0CGEQFjAF&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wipo.int%2Fedocs%2Fmdocs%2Fcopyright%2Fen%2Fsccr_25%2Fsccr_25_2_rev.doc&amp;ei=8FWaUeqlKKrJygGh9YDADg&amp;usg=AFQjCNFH5LfVxJf7y4tRkDYCi89jt_EdnQ&amp;sig2=oIkruGn4R5ZQQ1eUBHswuA&amp;bvm=bv.46751780,d.aWc' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=6&amp;ved=0CGEQFjAF&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wipo.int%2Fedocs%2Fmdocs%2Fcopyright%2Fen%2Fsccr_25%2Fsccr_25_2_rev.doc&amp;ei=8FWaUeqlKKrJygGh9YDADg&amp;usg=AFQjCNFH5LfVxJf7y4tRkDYCi89jt_EdnQ&amp;sig2=oIkruGn4R5ZQQ1eUBHswuA&amp;bvm=bv.46751780,d.aWc</a> - and see if it actually woudl cause a disruption in the international copyright structure. <br />
<br />
"I'm not familiar enough with the proposals to add much of value on the merits, but apparently neither is Mike. That doesn't stop him from writing this crap though. Why aren't you grilling him if you agree with me in part?"<br />
<br />
I don't grill Mike because his opinions don't matter that much to me (I like his ideas though). I come to Techdirt for the information (I mentioned before I usually click the links to see for myself what they say).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c607</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh in CharlotteNC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:16:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c607</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> Let's see the proposal. Let's see the exact text they are taking issue with. Let's discuss it on the merits. </i><br />
<br />
Never thought I'd see you say that.  It's pretty much a staple complaint on Techdirt that the public never gets to see the text of the various treaties and international agreements.<br />
<br />
So Joe, here's a question.  Are you agreeing with Techdirt and most of its readers and commenters that these agreements should be open and transparent to the public?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Interpretation</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c229</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeCool]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:15:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c229</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you (interrogators) think an audio recording might be misinterpreted, perhaps you need video to go with it. If you think the video might be misinterpreted, perhaps it's YOU that is the problem, not the recordings.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c63</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:14:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c63</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hmm... I think Iran, North Korea, and other anti-America countries have a new way to hurt the US.<br />
<br />
The US owned .com domain has aided and abetted MUCH worse and much more numerable crimes! Including<br />
<br />
-Hosting child porn<br />
-Hosting illegal files for download like music and videos<br />
-Hosting porn in general<br />
-Hosting websites that tell people how to do dangerous things, such as build an atomic bomb, cover your tracks after you commit a serious crime like murder<br />
<br />
Imagine all the economic damage if .com starts arbitrarily dumping large numbers of websites to avoid legal liability from all that stuff!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c214</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shon Gale]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:14:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c214</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Who ever said you could TRUST POLICE! They lie for a living, right along with Lawyers and Politicians. Never trust any of them, they will lie to you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>hangouts works on tmobilr</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130516/10513523106/att-continues-to-mock-concept-net-neutrality-this-time-with-google-hangouts-block.shtml#c445</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:13:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130516/10513523106/att-continues-to-mock-concept-net-neutrality-this-time-with-google-hangouts-block.shtml#c445</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hmm... interesting. I have att and my wife has tmobile. She has a gs3 I have a gs4. I can use hangouts on wifi while she can video call on cellular. When we use tango we both can use cellular to make a video call no problem. Its so ridiculousthat you pay for service and can't use it the way you want.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Once again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/03220823047/mpaa-freaks-out-insists-that-having-to-consider-fair-use-before-filing-dmca-takedown-would-be-crazy.shtml#c1257</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:12:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/03220823047/mpaa-freaks-out-insists-that-having-to-consider-fair-use-before-filing-dmca-takedown-would-be-crazy.shtml#c1257</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, umm... Tell that to Brian May, astrophysicist, rock star. Oh, you can call him doctor, by the way.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>