<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: ^Unprecedented QUAD POSTS! Hooray!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c354</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:21:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c354</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, you never learn blue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c47</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[gorehound]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:20:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c47</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And of course it is  in one of those Bible Thumping Southern States ! Censorship is just what they would love to do.........of course their Bible won't be.<br />
<br />
This is an Assault on our very 1ST Amendment Rights !]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yet again, Mike can't find a lower bound.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c46</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:20:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c46</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is a clear enough case to be beyond "free speech". And I see NO slipperly slope resulting, but surely there IS some limit.<br />
<br />
Mike definitely has a pattern of anti-morality combined with intricate legalisms to get around plain common law. -- Especially in copyright Go ahead and take what you haven't created. If Megaupload doesn't have a US address, then it can outright infringe! -- And don't worry about Google: you've NO right whatsoever to any privacy on the net or in person! Just let mega-corporations do whatever is technically possible, so long as there's no explicit exact statute against it. -- And over all that, Mike is constantly alarmed at what he deems "moral panics".<br />
<br />
Mike expects civilization to continue to exist without ANY principles or morality. -- And yet he's always puzzled when gov't and corporate thugs take moral fudging and tecnicalities as an okay for pillaging and flat-out tyranny. Mike refuses to see that private and public morality are connected.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c331</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RyanNerd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:19:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c331</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think it is utlility companies in general. If infringers didn't have water and gas to they would not be able to drink or cook their food. Wait.... Wait... Grocery stores. If the infringers had no food. Wait.... Wait.... Damn farmers!!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>What can stop it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c258</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:18:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c258</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nothing can stop the American inquisition!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>A particular sort of evil.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c746</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JEDIDIAH]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:18:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c746</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think he hates everyone. It's not just the blind. It just happens to be the blind that are the victim at this particular moment.<br />
<br />
No benefit or right is too trivial or too imagined to justify harming everyone else.<br />
<br />
THAT is the copyright maximalist mindset.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>A particular sort of evil.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c724</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JEDIDIAH]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:16:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c724</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They don't "hate" the blind, they just don't care if they do the blind harm or prevent others from helping the blind. They are evil narcissists who don't care they they are causing severe harm over a questionable or trivial "benefit".<br />
<br />
Their artistic megalomania is causing harm and they don't care.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>And yet</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c39</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChurchHatesTucker]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:14:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c39</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fifty Shades of Grey is sold brazenly. Way to drop the ball, Georgia.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c25</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:12:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c25</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value."<br />
<br />
Translation: it's not obscene if it's several hundred years old.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Liability Slipery Slope</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c329</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:09:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c329</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's liability all the way down...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c722</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:07:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c722</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Then the real question is...what is your point in being here?<br />
<br />
Your "voice of dissent" isn't listened to because nobody respects your opinion on things, so what other reason besides stroking your ego would you be here?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c323</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thenhow]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:05:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c323</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If I register "outoftheblueisamisguidedasshat.com" until the site is up and running, how can you tell if it's being used in the comission of a crime?<br />
<br />
Tinfoil hat, maybe?<br />
<br />
Please enlighten us how this works within the confines of your empty head.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c319</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:04:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c319</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The main problem is secondary liability because it will be taken to insane extremes. This is not practiced on the Internet for good reason. A second problem involves DHS services and their ability to properly route traffic. Blocking routers fundamentally threatens the nature of the net. Third, futility. Nothing the MPAA can ever do will make a dent in Internet piracy, but their quixotic quest will do a lot of damage to innocent third parties if we don't fight them at every turn.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c294</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:02:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c294</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He went full retard long ago]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c282</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:02:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c282</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A domain name is just that: a name.<br />
<br />
Are you arguing is that I can't name my kid, say, Jack because that name was used by a notorious criminal (Jack the Ripper)?<br />
<br />
From the point of view of the registrar, if someone wants to register a name like "piratebay.se" whatever happens beyond the technicalities of domain name registration is not their problem. Someone else will have to sort that out.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c268</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greevar]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:02:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c268</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[By glad, you mean the opposite.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c23</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:01:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c23</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I find censorship of free speech obscene.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c267</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[youve_gone_full_retard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:00:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c267</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Seriously?<br />
<br />
You're seriously agreeing with holding the registrar of all .com domains as an accomplice because of piracy?<br />
<br />
Congratulations. You've gone full retard.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>More of the same.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c255</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greevar]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:00:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c255</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is a brazen attempt to censor someone that is using speech that is the supposed "property" of someone else and they're trying to do it by throwing the baby out with the bath water or culling the herd to get one sick cattle. I find it reprehensible and despicable that people accept the idea the some speech can be owned and grant people the power to censor others from using that speech because of monetary concerns. Copyright is not about the profitability, or the enabling of, a particular business model. Copyright was concerned with one thing: greater access to a greater supply of creative and educational works so that others can use those to create even more works. However, we don't enjoy such a benefit, we are beholden to abide by overreaching property rights that have been insidiously obtained for the exclusive benefit of rent seekers like the publishing corporations in total contradiction to free speech. Speech is the inalienable right of every intelligent being capable of symbolic interaction. No one, and I mean NO ONE, deserves to subvert or abridge that right for any reason.<br />
<br />
The whole reason publishers need the copyright laws to exist as they do is because the publishers themselves do not offer anything of value that is exclusive or scarce. They exploit the people that do the real work so they can collect income because they merely "own" something. The people they pay to create works already provided the exclusive and scarce value in content: the labor applied to the content's creation. They use their vast supply of money to exploit hard-working people so they can turn that money into more money, all without adding anything of real value. To do this, they establish laws that create the illusion of scarcity so that they can sell something that does not merit a market price. If ideas were worth money, the deluge of ideas coming at the publishing corporations would be bought up at a feverish pace, but ideas are worth shit. What's worth money is how you can <i><b>execute</b></i> that idea into an expression. If you execute well, people will respond. If not, you'll be ignored.<br />
<br />
So, this whole idea of censoring free speech to silence a few people violating their ill-gotten property rights is just ethically disgusting. Nobody deserves nor needs copyright since it has no redeeming qualities. Any argument made for the existence of copyright can be countered by adapting business strategies to fit the situation. If you don't want people to get your works for free, then don't publish them. I guarantee you that is the only way you'll avoid anybody copying your works. Publishing is the first step to sharing content. However, the only person that will ever know about your work is you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Liability Slipery Slope</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c248</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:59:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c248</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They are obviously guilty of tertiary liability.  By writing this article, you are guilty of quaternary liability and should count your lucky starts that Sweden doesn't have extradition.<br />
<br />
Anyone responding to this post in a negative manner is guilty of quinary liability. (no tag-backs)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>