<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Even Mike can't help misreading the Constitution</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1736</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[tanj]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:25:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1736</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The laws against theft would only apply to the original taking. Any subsequent copies would not be covered.<br />
<br />
For example an author writes a book. The book is stolen and a copy is sold to a publisher. The copy is not stolen property and subsequent copies would also not be stolen property. So the author's only recourse would be against the original thief.<br />
<br />
Here is a case that deals with this issue.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowling_v._United_States_' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowling_v._United_States_</a>(1985)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c172</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[[citation needed or GTFO]]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:55:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c172</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[...says the anonymous tech blog troll hiding behind a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Horse_with_No_Name" rel="nofollow">"gold RIAA"</a> handle.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/17551823088/floridas-redlight-program-designed-to-make-driving-more-dangerous-shortening-yellow-lights.shtml#c444</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:18:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/17551823088/floridas-redlight-program-designed-to-make-driving-more-dangerous-shortening-yellow-lights.shtml#c444</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was with you t the point where you said that what the cops wanted was less people running red lights.  They don't want that.  They want the money generated from writing more tickets.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: When everything we do is monitored</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c2270</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Lainson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:01:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c2270</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Each time I read my response, I'm not sure if I'm very clear about what I am suggesting. So let me try again.<br />
<br />
I think we have very limited privacy these days and most of the monitoring is coming from private industry. I read a lot of articles directed to advertisers and marketers. The data collection companies are very proud of the fact that they are compiling a ton of data on everyone. <br />
<br />
And many tech companies are proud of what they have developed to allow them to use the latest devices to track everything and everyone.<br />
<br />
The only time these companies raise the privacy issue is when they want to paint government in a negative light. <br />
<br />
And yet, private companies are also working with government. I am skeptical that much is done in DC without corporate input. So whatever policies are coming out of DC have probably been shaped to benefit someone's bottom line.<br />
<br />
I think we need to discuss privacy on a big scale and what that means to everyone. The positives are that all of these monitors could improve lives. The negatives are that this info can be used against us. (And don't assume government is the only guilty party here. Insurance companies, credit companies, banks, and so on would love to know who to exclude as customers.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: There you go</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c163</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:58:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c163</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No one cares and yet, here you are.<br />
<br />
Hmmmm.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c143</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Togashi]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:55:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c143</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because a belief in privacy is completely irreconcilable with a desire to fight copyright trolls? I don't even see where you thought you were going with this one.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c134</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:53:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c134</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Indeed, how <i>dare</i> they not make themselves an easily sue-able, harassable target for any of the parasites/criminals who may be angry that their extortion racket is being threatened! /s]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>How droll</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c133</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:24:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c133</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fight copyright trolls, hiding behind a name privacy system out of Panama.  Way to stand up for your beliefs!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1713</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Millais]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:20:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1713</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Everyone wants stuff for free" is true and should be an integral part of these policy discussions. "Everyone <b>just</b> wants stuff for free" is not true and should not be the basis of policy.<br />
<br />
The reality is that right now, many people choose to get gobs of convenient content for free, and most of those people also choose to pay for <i>some</i> content in various forms. This has been going on for a long time. Content still generates tons of cashflow. It's in different configurations than before, but the money is still all there, notwithstanding wages not keeping pace with inflation and debt.<br />
<br />
What needs to be abandoned in these discussions is the notion that this longstanding reality - that not all content needs to be licensed and paid for ad infinitum - is an unsustainable situation which government needs to put an immediate and total stop to, or even curb to some degree. Likewise, pitting every proposal against the binary choice of strictly paying for every use and experience of content, versus no payment or enforcement for anything, is utter nonsense. And as we repeatedly point out here, it is counterproductive to regard as a hostile adversary every consumer who expects certain things - or anything - to be free.<br />
<br />
Yet, the copyright maximalists have long dominated Congress's ear and have very well established these strict, absolute parameters for the conversation. It will require creative thinking to get lawmakers to understand that progress will come from realizing it is their <i>duty</i> to abandon this polarized framing of the issues.<br />
<br />
A much more realistic starting point for policy is to acknowledge that the public fully expects that certain kinds of uses of content need not be licensed or subject to fees, and that most people draw some kind of distinction between the acceptability of unlicensed commercial and noncommercial uses. This has been manifesting in people's actual behavior for decades, and is supported by polls and the surge of democratized, creative output. Lawmakers and industry need to stop fighting these expectations and developments; these changes need to be enshrined and protected by law, not punished.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c111</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:55:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c111</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[OHAI SJD!<br />
<br />
I'm happy for once I beat you to a prize, I got my posts of the week before you got yours. :)<br />
Of course you still have more mentions by Judges in footnotes than I do...<br />
<br />
With all of the recent stories, some crossing over the barriers between interest groups, it is nice to see that there is more notice being paid to copyright and the extra rights the monopoly holders demand everyone else give up to protect imaginary profits.  <br />
With Steele/Pretenda getting much wider coverage than ever before, I think people are finally cluing into the idea that the system might actually be flawed and the cries of but piracy are just a nice smokescreen to hide the cartel membership not wanting to adapt to the current market.<br />
<br />
As always it is a joy to 'see' you... looking forward to Monday...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Let me get this straight.....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c787</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[theta1138]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:03:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c787</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[True, but honestly, I think that last line was implied as a threat: "I'll find every shitty thing you've ever posted on the Internet and tell your mom!"<br />
<br />
Admittedly that might be more of a threat to some people than others, but it's a pretty weak one.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: WHOA! Stop at: &quot;everyone just wants stuff for free&quot;.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1708</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Millais]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:56:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1708</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I look at it like the copyright industries have spent decades getting us to treat content as nothing but a commodity. They have drilled into our heads that nothing else matters but the money. It's not art, it's not work product, it's not culture, it's not ideas. So now that's exactly what we all do: treat it as a pure commodity. And that means that we sometimes get to determine the market value of the content to be less than what they want it to be. Oh well.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Even Mike can't help misreading the Constitution</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1695</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:25:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1695</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wait, why would you even <i>need</i> to protect unpublished writings? If someone takes something you've written but not published, laws against theft would be plenty to deal with that, no need to add another law on top just to muddy the waters.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: There you go</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c89</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:25:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c89</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[John Steele just hates it when due process is enforced.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: WOW World changers</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130518/00045923138/awesome-stuff-cool-product-designs.shtml#c52</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:07:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130518/00045923138/awesome-stuff-cool-product-designs.shtml#c52</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[OK Mr. Troll. If these things make people happy then they improve their quality of life. If people have happier more fulfilling lives they in turn treat others better and are more inclined to help out. They also won't go around bitching at people as much. <br />
<br />
So yeah, that's better for society in general. It also puts money in the hand of creators and thinkers that will in turn spend it in their local economies to help their production as apposed to hoarding it. <br />
<br />
Even if you don't care about those scenarios it made Masnick happy to hear about them so that's good for him. Just like being a hyperbolic asshole makes you feel better about yourself as you attempt to push his buttons to feel that fleeting moment of control in your life.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130518/00045923138/awesome-stuff-cool-product-designs.shtml#c43</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:01:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130518/00045923138/awesome-stuff-cool-product-designs.shtml#c43</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[One of the guys in the Windcatcher video said they use a phenomena called "entrainment" a quick search brought this up: <a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrainment_%28hydrodynamics%29' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrainment_%28hydrodynamics%29</a>  <br />
<br />
And this diagram is probably similar to how their product works. <a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eductor-jet_pump' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eductor-jet_pump</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: There you go</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c72</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[sophisticatedjanedoe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:00:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c72</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sorry about that. It seems that (unintentional) refreshing of the after-comment page ("You comment is posted...") generates a comment copy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: It seems</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/16014423066/more-details-show-irs-targeted-groups-critical-how-government-was-run.shtml#c1563</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[kehvan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:52:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/16014423066/more-details-show-irs-targeted-groups-critical-how-government-was-run.shtml#c1563</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It comes down to one thing and one thing only, you're going to overlook the unethical actions of the IRS for whatever your personal/political reasons or you're not.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>dating</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130211/00562121942/new-book-about-data-mining-to-find-love-online-has-author-admit-to-possible-cfaa-violations.shtml#c325</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:33:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130211/00562121942/new-book-about-data-mining-to-find-love-online-has-author-admit-to-possible-cfaa-violations.shtml#c325</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[this why i dont trust online dating, theres a lot of ways to make the other person to believe who you are representing but theres only few ways to prove who they really are. meeting them in person which is very risky if the person is a psycho and making them show you their government issued id but still sometimes can be fake too lol... just try to make or find your dates in a natural, ask your friends to set you up for a date, go to the park be active hoping youll meet someone in the way]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Template hit! Anomaly, lawsuit, won't ever affect anyone else.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/10535223120/indian-publishing-firm-cant-take-little-criticism-threatens-blogger-with-1-billion-lawsuit-criminal-charges.shtml#c158</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:29:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/10535223120/indian-publishing-firm-cant-take-little-criticism-threatens-blogger-with-1-billion-lawsuit-criminal-charges.shtml#c158</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're assuming he reads the articles in the first place, which I'm fairly sure he doesn't do, as it would 'waste' the time he could spend ranting about the articles, the site, Mike, the color of grass, or whatever has his attention at the moment.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>