<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c36</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[cpt kangarooski]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:55:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c36</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The safety of the technology isn't the issue. The problem is that humans will always manage to screw it up somehow, and when they do, the consequences with this stuff can be very bad. Useful as it might be, it's just too big of a risk. We ought to be pursuing green energy production and significantly reducing our energy consumption by being more efficient.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c597</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:46:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c597</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's okay, you can replace piracy with:<br />
<br />
Filling Users Content Knowledge Entirely Digital - FUCKED.<br />
<br />
or Content Universally Needs Trading - CUNT<br />
<br />
<br />
it's all good.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c715</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:44:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c715</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're not taking it far enough, what enables the crops to do their misdeeds? The sun! That's right, the sun is the root of all evil and needs to be destroyed, I suggest we send all our nukes at it immediately!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>District Court In Error</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c759</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Be Overturned Upon Appeal]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:43:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c759</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[On appeal, cite these cases:<br />
<br />
<a href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reno_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reno_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union</a><br />
<br />
<a href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition</a><br />
<br />
District Court ruling goes down in flames.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Still</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/06201422976/chicago-blackhawks-fire-reporter-over-silly-old-youtube-videos.shtml#c325</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:37:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/06201422976/chicago-blackhawks-fire-reporter-over-silly-old-youtube-videos.shtml#c325</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>Major automakers concocting horrible advertising around suicide</b><br />
<br />
you keep talking about it.  Short term fail perhaps, but long term everyone knows the name of the ocmpany.  Most businesses would do anything for this level of exposure, good or bad.<br />
<br />
It's actually funny to see bloggers like you played in this manner.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c848</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:33:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c848</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They have investigative discretion. For them to choose who they are going to investigate (partly) based on who leaks embarrassing information against them is similar to the IRS basing their investigations on political affiliation. It violates the principle that the govt should not go after whistle blowers based on the fact that they blew a whistle.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Also found in this law</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c752</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:29:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c752</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["any drug, medicine, article, or thing designed, adapted, or intended for producing abortion, or for any indecent or immoral use; or any written or printed card, letter, circular, book, pamphlet, advertisement, or notice of any kind giving information, directly or indirectly, where, how, or of whom, or by what means any of such mentioned articles, matters, or things may be obtained or made"<br />
<br />
I'm surprised this whole law wasn't declared unconstitutional.  I mean, I understand the desire to ban "anything immoral", but that's so open to interpretation that it seems to be impermissibly vague.  I don't like the idea of a law which automatically incorporates "community standards".  If you want to make written depictions of child sex illegal, then you should explicitly say so, and not leave people to guess.  <br />
<br />
I mean, we ordinarily have specific laws against things like arson and murder. We don't just leave it to some generic law that prohibits "indecent acts" with the implication that murder and arson are indecent.  Because that would be silly.  Yet somehow, it's deemed acceptable here.<br />
<br />
This entire CHAPTER of the law has some rather over the top punishments, too.  Using an epithet on a postcard can get you 5 years.  Because... what, the mailman might get offended?<br />
<br />
"interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934)"<br />
<br />
OK, I just had to laugh at that.<br />
<br />
"Every obscene, lewd, lascivious, indecent, filthy or vile article, matter, thing, device, or substance"<br />
<br />
Come on now, get out your thesaurus, I think you missed a few synonyms.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: These sites are all bad and must be taken down.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c590</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:28:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c590</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Then where will I go when I need grift?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c575</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:26:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c575</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Take down request asks for verification that you checked the content under threat of perjury. Start charging people for perjury and you won't find a lot of people to sign those forms. But yes, even then the "company" will always just crawl back and lick it's wounds until it finds a new loophole.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/10360323060/criminal-nabbed-his-own-food-porn.shtml#c40</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miff]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:23:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/10360323060/criminal-nabbed-his-own-food-porn.shtml#c40</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&gt; It begins with Troy Maye, who is accused of grabbing identifying info on people and then attempting to sell the identities off to bidders. <br />
<br />
Isn't that just called analytics nowadays?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c571</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:22:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c571</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[/blog]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/06201422976/chicago-blackhawks-fire-reporter-over-silly-old-youtube-videos.shtml#c301</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:17:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/06201422976/chicago-blackhawks-fire-reporter-over-silly-old-youtube-videos.shtml#c301</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wirtz, owner and chairman, "requested" it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: So, anyone who still believes that &quot;1984&quot; is fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c836</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:10:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c836</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Government probably didn't care to have their game plan out in the open like that.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c558</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:09:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c558</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What do you expect from a jackass whose best excuse for an argument is "Bawk bawk bawk!"?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Said it once, will say it again....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c544</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:06:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c544</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nah, I'd go with something that would <i>really</i> get their attention: revocation of copyright. <br />
<br />
Since they seem to love the idea of 6-strikes for piracy, just turn it around on them, with 5 bogus takedowns allowed in a year, and at the 6th their copyright over whatever it is they are issuing the DMCA claim for is revoked instantly, and it goes into the public domain.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c728</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:00:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c728</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>Even if it doesn't involve real children? Would you rather pedophiles find a different outlet than fantasy to satisfy their urges?</b><br />
<br />
The lesser of two evils option does not minimize the evil.  You can go and read up on things like escalation and training to understand why you can't just trade one for the other and feel better.<br />
<br />
<b>Age doesn't make any difference to fictional characters. They react however the author wants them to react. But it seems there's something you'd like to say about "sex with slightly underage boys or girls (say 15 or 16)" in general?</b><br />
<br />
Any basic text on sexual urges will tell you that there is a big difference between pre and post pubescent desires.  All I am saying is that many of us (except perhaps the geeks around here) had sex before their 18th birthday, but hopefully none before your 10th birthday.  There is a really big difference, one that almost anyone can see.<br />
<br />
<b>Bypass what, exactly? Obscenity is always determined after the fact. There is no law that defines it in a way that would create a "loophole" of any kind.</b><br />
<br />
The bypass is that once they got a ruling saying that the written word is rarely obscene, they all piled in.  Real CP is rare as hell on the open internet, but you can find pedophile spank stories all over the place (just search for the author's name in question on Google...).   They saw a way to share and communicate with each other about their experiences and fantasies, while skirting the law by hiding in the first amendment.<br />
<br />
<b>Training material? Are you suggesting anybody could be trained? Could you? As in "there but for the grace of God go I"?</b><br />
<br />
Nice attempt at baiting, but you fail.  You really do need to go read up a bit before you toss stuff like that out there.  Yes, people can be trained, they go from having a basic urge but not knowing a way to express it into being a well trained soldier who learns from these stories ways to lure children.  <br />
<br />
Please stop trolling, okay?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1369</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[btrussell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:56:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1369</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You want to talk about Mike and they want to talk about you. Looks like you are in the wrong forum.<br />
<br />
Try talking about the article and see what happens. But you will need to leave the author out of it.<br />
<br />
Here is a free tip:<br />
Always consider your audience and do not underestimate their intelligence.<br />
<br />
Birds of a feather, fly together. I was drawn to the flock not for what was being told, but because of beliefs I had beforehand. Copyright is out of control and is too much of a burden on the public.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1360</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:52:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1360</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[But they will only give those concessions to the Blind if the rest of us give up existing rights.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/10360323060/criminal-nabbed-his-own-food-porn.shtml#c35</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:44:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/10360323060/criminal-nabbed-his-own-food-porn.shtml#c35</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Looks like this guy...<br />
<br />
(]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/10360323060/criminal-nabbed-his-own-food-porn.shtml#c11</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:33:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/10360323060/criminal-nabbed-his-own-food-porn.shtml#c11</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Man, I'd hate to be the health inspector assigned to YOLO restaurant. Sounds dangerous...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>