<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Actually, had to shut down because of piracy!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c47</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:18:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c47</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You can't compete with free.<br />
<br />
Also, all DRM is due to piracy.<br />
<br />
So this article is, if read with any sense at all, despite the silly denials, arguments against piracy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>It's happened before, and it will happen again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c27</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:17:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c27</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[With music.<br />
<br />
Microsoft created Plays For Sure.  They partnered with third party media player makers, and with content owners.<br />
<br />
Later Microsoft decided to copy Apple's strategy more closely.  So Microsoft announced that they would be shutting down the DRM servers for Plays For Sure.  Better get your content onto the final device you want to rest in peace on.<br />
<br />
Next, Microsoft introduced the Zune.  Microsoft is the only device vendor.  Microsoft controls the store.  Microsoft partners with content providers.  This time you can trust DRM -- you won't get micro shafted -- for sure!<br />
<br />
Later, Microsoft abandons Zune.  So Microsoft announced that they would be shutting down the DRM servers for Plays For Sure.  Better get your content onto the final device you want to rest in peace on.<br />
<br />
Amazon and others have had episodes like this with ebooks and other content.  There have also been episodes of purchased books magically being 'disappeared' from customer devices for various reasons.<br />
<br />
Never trust DRM.  Don't buy it.  Don't participate.  If they are 'selling' you something with DRM then you are getting screwed.<br />
<br />
Rented or streaming content isn't quite as bad because it is clear up front that you are merely renting for a limited time, or are streaming while that content is offered and available.<br />
<br />
Is it any surprise that physical DVD's seem to be disappearing from the market?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Skycrime</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c930</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:16:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c930</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wonder how a Drone would fair against a model rocket?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1362</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:15:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1362</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I want to patent the wheel.<br />
<br />
<b>...on the internet!</b>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Drones</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c912</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[btr1701]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:14:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c912</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Congress and the FAA could solve this problem quickly and easily. Just mandate a 1000-foot minimum altitude over private property, for all types of aircraft, regardless of whether it's urban or rural.<br />
<br />
That preserves both the property owner's privacy and trespass rights, while still allowing for legitimate commercial aviation activities.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Alternativly, the birth of 3 factor authenication</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1339</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:07:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1339</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[See my Prior Art post above.  It covers all three of the most basic ways that you can authenticate.<br />
<br />
Four, Five and other Poly-Factor authentication is just re-using one or more of the basic three factors.<br />
<br />
1. Something you know (password, PIN, passphrase)<br />
2. Something you have (ATM card, RSA fob device, building key, passport, etc)<br />
3. Something you are (fingerprint, retina scan, voiceprint, DNA, how you type, pressure patterns of your handwriting, etc)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: &quot;reasonably monetize what might be considered infringement under the law&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c509</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord_Unseen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:06:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c509</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You know that doesn't really contradict his claims, right? It could be considered trademark infringement if the character in question is trademarked. Sadly, nearly all of Disney's characters are trademarked.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1329</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:03:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1329</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&gt; If that was the case that prior art should have been patented,<br />
&gt; and Kim would not have been issued with the patent in the first place.<br />
<br />
<br />
That is outright not true in two different ways.<br />
<br />
1. The prior art does not need a patent to prevent subsequent patenting.  The prior art only needs <i>publication</i>.<br />
<br />
2. Even if the prior art were patented this doesn't mean the broken USPTO wouldn't grant more patents on it.  The more the merrier right?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1311</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:03:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1311</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>It is being discussed on TD you troll.</i><br />
<br />
Where in the article does Mike suggest the patent might be invalid? Seems like you're the one trolling by pretending like Mike said something he didn't.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>provided a FAQ that details everything purchasers can and can't do with their purchased movies.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c3</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[weneedhelp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:02:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c3</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Um any time you need to provide an FAQ for what you can and cant do with legally purchased content... the pirates have won again.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1292</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:00:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1292</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&gt; so validity will not be discussed on TD.<br />
<br />
It is being discussed on TD you troll.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1289</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:00:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1289</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What is the practical implication of "the tech industry to think about participating in the case,"? <br />
<br />
An amicus brief won't be worth a bucket of warm spit in the absence of a vigorous defense. Clearly, the implication is that the 'tech industry' (Google, Facebook, Twitter) should fund Fat Bastard's litigation. Which is exactly what he is demanding in exchange for not suing them for patent infringement.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: &amp;quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&amp;quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1287</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:58:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1287</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That.<br />
<br />
That right there.  It shows that those who love copyright so much don't even know what it is and what it is not.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c168</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessie]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:54:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c168</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, I tried it out for everyone.  Siri does not understand "I'm going to kill my wife".  So don't worry, it's still safe to use Siri to help you plot your next murder.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c161</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Muir]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:54:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c161</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The last thing we need is the 911 call centers clogged up with even more "non-emergency" calls.  It is already a real problem when people dial on purpose and want to complain about their neighbor's dog barking for the last three hours.  Of course it's okay if the nature of the call is: "If that dog doesn't shut up I will kill myself and then the rest of the neighborhood. Or something."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1264</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:52:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1264</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[While we're talking about Kim D., Mike, any chance that you can directly and honestly admit that there is in fact an allegation of specific criminal infringement in the indictment (for "Taken")? You've denied this in the past even though it's undeniably true. Any chance you could just admit it? Thanks.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: &quot;reasonably monetize what might be considered infringement under the law&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c492</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:51:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c492</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Figures. This bullshit comes from Peter Keel of the Pirate Party. Obviously, he's confused wishful thinking with fact.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1247</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:51:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1247</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>then you said that his victims should consider paying up and playing along</em><br />
<br />
Except he said no such thing. He said it was a good idea for "the tech industry to think about participating in the case," <strong>not</strong> that it was a good idea for them to "pay up." Not once did he say that the tech companies should give in to the patent trolling, just that they have an interest in the outcome of the case.<br />
<br />
Once again, you're lying. What a shocker.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1228</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:50:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1228</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's not different <i>at all</i>.  It's a fucking stupid move by Dotcom.<br />
<br />
<i>However</i>, I can understand why he's gone down that route, even if I think it's a massively idiotic move.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Unlimited Talk</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c345</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[kitsune361]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:49:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c345</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What's funnier is how we've been paying a premium for SMS messaging all these years.  Newsflash, those SMS messages are typically piggybacked on existing "heartbeat" transmissions to the cell towers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>