<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c658</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:24:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c658</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>When you have no real downtime -- no time when you can be free from prying eyes, it messes with your brain in a really profound way.</blockquote><br />
<br />
Do you realize you've just made the case against Christianity?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Nintendo welcomes used games</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1564</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillip]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:23:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1564</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wasn't saying it does. That is the only thing that is currently restricted. the latest shooter/sports/game etc they have one time use codes to try to capture money if you sell the game, and the new owner wants to play online.<br />
<br />
So with nintendo having shit for online support people don't care and the codes weren't worth the cost in infrastructure and support to implement. As far as I know there aren't any games on the 360/wii(u)/ps3 that tried to restrict single player. Some added "free" access to DLC or one time codes for "online" but that is it. This is all that people will be able to do with Sony or nintendo. Unless either company tried to stop a 3rd party there isn't DRM on either system is all I was pointing out since neither will do this with their games. Sony said they'll let publishers do whatever they think might work, and at the moment there is almost no 3rd part on the Wii U so it remains to be seen what if anything will happen]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: OK, someone help me out here...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c340</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:23:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c340</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The US corporations and government think that they should rule the world.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Hey, Mike: India has 1,210,193,422 people! Should be FOUR times Hollywood!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c337</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keroberos]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:23:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c337</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>Four times the population should -- if the simplistic measure that Mike makes is valid -- mean four times the production.</i></blockquote>No, Population size has very little to do with <b><i>market</i></b> size. Anyone that understands even the most basic of economic principles knows that production of goods in a market is tied the the ability of that market to consume it. Excessive overproduction leads to market crashes. I don't see anywhere in the article where Mike measured India's film industry against anything. He used the only valid measure in economics; India's film industry seems to be successful and profitable at its current production levels. He used a <b><i>comparison</i></b> of the numbers of films produced in India vs. the number made in the US to help illustrate that point.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sexually Transmitted Diseases</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050609/1751216.shtml#c3652</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linda M Silver]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:22:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050609/1751216.shtml#c3652</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Email me asap; all boyfriends, girlfriends, married boyfriends &amp; gays 1989 to present. Email or call 7038435389]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c191</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:20:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c191</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Federal Reserve is part of the problem, I agree!<br />
<br />
The other parts of the problem are the 16th and 17th Amendments passed by those early 20th century "Progressives"<br />
<br />
16th concentrates massive amounts of money in one place, the Federal Government.  Money leads to power and power leads to corruption.<br />
<br />
17th allowed mob rule eliminating the ability of individual states to have a say in how the federal government is run.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>You know what also is pretty clear...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c177</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:18:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c177</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The 4th amendment.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Traitor Mike</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c165</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:15:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c165</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They still have milkmen?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: OK, someone help me out here...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c322</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:15:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c322</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You forget, US government/corporate(not that there's much of a difference these days) thinking is that <b>every</b> country should do what the US tells them, with two of those 'suggestions' being 'never compete with US interests', and 'never make US law look bad by providing counter-examples', something that Bollywood is currently doing quite well.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c149</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:12:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c149</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We as a country are screwed]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c129</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lance]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:11:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c129</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I reject his premise. Greenwald didn't violate 18USC798. The information release was not "prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States" because WE are the United States, and WE need to know our gov't. is doing this crap. Neither was it "for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States". <br />
 So no law has been violated. I do agree that it is a first amm. violation to prosecute the publisher if he did not personally break a law in obtaining the information.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c123</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:10:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c123</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[forgive me for being so ill informed, but: <br />
<br />
why would anyone ever want to purposefully contravene the Constitution, when it is what your country is built on and what people hold most dear?<br />
<br />
why would anyone ever want to bring in a law that makes contravening any part of the Constitution legal?<br />
<br />
even more to the point, why is a person(s) who wants to bring in a law that contravenes the Constitution even allowed to try??<br />
<br />
sounds a bit sus to me!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>So wait...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c116</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:09:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c116</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[1. Government commits crime.<br />
2. Government classifies any data or evidence relating to said crime.<br />
3. Government makes it illegal to leak or even talk about classified information.<br />
4. Government finds itself in the position of being completely unaccountable for anything it does, as to expose their actions to public scrutiny and the possibility of justice one has to first break the law to do so, and even then evidence is forbidden from being presented, as it's 'classified', making any court case against the government impossible.<br />
<br />
And the <i>whistleblowers</i> are supposed to be the enemies of the country?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Traitor Mike</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c111</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:07:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c111</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wait...Mike is also a milkman? Wow!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Now we know</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c93</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:05:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c93</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So this means that the classified, redacted enemy that Bradley Manning was aiding and abetting is us, the public. Even if nobody comes out and says so in so many words.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c587</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:05:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c587</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think AJ deserves a new nickname after the last week or so:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Tn3huAudp2U/THh2IKe-opI/AAAAAAAAJP0/EWBffnI0arA/s400/Milky+the+Clown.jpg" rel="nofollow">Milky the Clown</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: What's next....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c743</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:04:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c743</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This. Look what they've done with the term "weapons of mass destruction". Originally, the term referred only to weapons actually capable of mass destruction -- of which there was really only one: nuclear bombs.<br />
<br />
Then they started including biological and chemical weapons in the category. You <i>might</i> be able to make the case for certain biological weapons (certainly not anthrax, though), but not chemical weapons.<br />
<br />
Now, apparently, a WMD means anything that can kill more than three people at a time, or anything that explodes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c317</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:04:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c317</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Can we just make pro-copyright lunacy illegal? That would be greeeeeeeeeat.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c293</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheLastCzarnian]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:03:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c293</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is that a Red Dwarf reference?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c586</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:02:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c586</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're really starting to creep me out and I'm not even the target of your sick game. I think I'm going to refer this to our D.A.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>