<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: new business model</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c249</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:04:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c249</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If revenues are declining, maybe you should figure out why people are not buying your stuff.  Maybe they don't want it anymore.  Not even for free.<br />
<br />
People buy Bottled Water (can't compete with free).  And the bottled water companies don't need to give away their water to sell t-shirts.<br />
<br />
Maybe you should try the copyright trolling business model.  It seems to have worked well for Righthaven and Prenda.  You too can be rich beyond your wildest delusional ravings!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Turnabout is fair play</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c229</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:04:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c229</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That would play into the RIAA hands, as the only way left to release music would be CDs and they control that market.<br />
Remember that every artist that publishes outwith their control is competition for their business. It is this competition that will kill them in the end as their sales will drop as more artists compete in the market outwith their control.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c594</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Howard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:04:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c594</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[hackers do not have cretin, incompetent, greedy managers, deadlines etc.<br />
<br />
Also, "programmers" are on the defensive in a battle badly tilted against them, mostly because their bosses choose to piss against the wind instead of turn around.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's a for profit site</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c245</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:04:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c245</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Which as a Libertarian he should wholeheartedly support. Profit to the strongest, not the most deserving! (Although the objectivist mantra of the strongest are the most deserving might apply here...)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c187</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:03:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c187</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA['despite heavy budget cuts and layoffs, the RIAA hasn't yet realized that singing the same old debunked song isn't a winner'<br />
<br />
convincing those in Congress will be harder than convincing these. there is little between them as far as common sense is concerned!<br />
<br />
' It's claiming that the DMCA's safe harbors are broken and need to be fixed'<br />
<br />
quite true. however, the fixing that is needed is so the DMCA does what it is supposed to do, not what the RIAA and other entertainment industries want it to do, and, in fact, try to make out that it does! the 20million take downs wont be enough for them if it was 200million. instead of keep getting sites, links and whatever else taken down, offering the same things from their own sites how customers want and keep asking for would be a better move. at least then they would be getting money in instead of keeping paying out! even with others paying bills for them they still have unnecessary outlays. ridiculous business plan!<br />
<br />
as far as bogus take downs are concerned, 'do they not realize (or not care) what a massive chilling effect that would have on innovation?'<br />
<br />
they realise alright! they just do not care! they have it in their heads that there is nothing as important in the whole, wide world as a music track or movie. everything else is purely incidental. if the other things didn't exist, it doesn't matter. if things that could/should be released are not, it doesn't matter! there is nothing more ridiculous and more self centered than an industry with this sort of attitude!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Just another politician.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c224</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:02:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c224</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Which is why he might be considered an excessive loon. :)<br />
<br />
I really don't see how A) will lead to B(ii) - in fact I don't see how B(i) would lead to B(ii). Cutting spending and/or increasing tax, and reducing waste (including insane military spending and corporate boondoggles) would be much simpler.<br />
<br />
If C) is true (I'm British so can't tell so well) then kudos to him - but one 'sane' idea in many 'insane' ones does not a desirable make.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c155</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:01:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c155</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I've made the point many times before that:<br />
1. Google is not the only search engine<br />
2. If they focused their efforts on the host, then <i>ALL</i> links, including search engine links would no longer matter<br />
<br />
But they're too stupid to get it as their continued focus on Google demonstrates.<br />
<br />
I never thought of what you said:  Maybe their problem is the think Google is the whole internet.<br />
<br />
But how did Google take over from America Online which used to be the whole internet?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: new business model</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c142</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:57:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c142</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[old model, I meant of course...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's fair play, and would stop piracy, what's not to love?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c128</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:57:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c128</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's not just fair play, but it would actually stop piracy.<br />
<br />
Be careful what you wish for.<br />
<br />
Eliminate every single work of the RIAA from the internet.  Every.  Single.  One.  Because it <i>might</i> be infringing.  And we can't be sure if it is authorized if the RIAA cannot even be sure it is authorized.  And it might not be fair use.<br />
<br />
If just anyone, anywhere can get content taken down from, say Amazon or iTunes, then that's great.  The RIAA (and MPAA) seems to think it just fine that they can take down content that they do not own.  Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.<br />
<br />
If the RIAA wants to have a penalty for using the DMCA to take down content the filer does not own, then that needs to work both ways -- and with real teeth.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Turnabout is fair play</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c107</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:57:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c107</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You give them too much credit. That too would be the fault of aaaahhh pirates!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c88</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:57:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c88</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maybe their problem is the think Google is the whole internet.<br />
Rather that send notices to the sites with the allegedly infringing links they just whine to Google to delist them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c221</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:55:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c221</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So, if these are really just supporters, then why do they want to hold on to the domain name after being treated so badly?  Surely they don't love the man so much that they'll endure continual lawsuits from him just to own his name.  I suspect there is more to this story than has been reported here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>*new* business model</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c75</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[saulgoode]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:55:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c75</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>Maybe layoff the "anti-piracy" team -- since clearly that's not working for you -- and hire a "new business model" or "innovation" team, and give them a shot to help your members.</i></blockquote><br />
Maybe hire Jonathon Coulton, Alex Day, or better still Psy to show the way.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hum...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c58</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:55:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c58</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[RIAA's shirts are pretty, but they only come in straitjacket form-factor.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: new business model</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c50</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:54:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c50</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Seeing that content creators receive more for the sale of t-shirts than their actual content what you are being sarcastic about is actually a much better business model that what they are trying to push.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: new business model</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c41</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:51:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c41</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Looootttsss of previous threads over the years debunking this idiotic argument that's a complete misrepresentation of anything that anyone here has ever said, and an obvious attempt to deflect away from the fact that the new model will simply not work long term in today's market..<br />
<br />
But you knew that.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: new business model</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c37</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:49:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c37</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Live in the past.  Winner!<br />
<br />
FTFY]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Innovation?  Try Predation!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c613</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:49:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c613</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["A self-employed writer of non fanfic?"<br />
<br />
a.k.a. a writer. She's saying that she writes for a living, but can't monetise one area of her writing due to copyright.<br />
<br />
It's amazing that your zealous defence of the broken copyright system involves attacking people you claim to be protecting. You're actually attacking writers (and - assuming you're the same AC as other similar threads - games developers, musicians and filmmakers among others) who disagree with your obsession with infinite copyright. You're attacking content creators because they don't agree with the way that copyright has been twisted beyond recognition to support the income of those who won't adapt.<br />
<br />
Incredible, but at least nobody's going to confuse you with someone with intellectual honesty and a fact-based argument.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>The looters are winning</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/18225323199/president-obama-is-troubled-about-chilling-effects-his-own-administration-is-causing-to-journalism.shtml#c440</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:46:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/18225323199/president-obama-is-troubled-about-chilling-effects-his-own-administration-is-causing-to-journalism.shtml#c440</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I've already read a book about this administration.  It ends with the transportation and distribution systems breaking down, massive nationwide rioting, the lights going out in NYC, and a general decline back to an eighteenth century level civilization (and I use the word "civilization" loosely).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20110715/02212815101/verizon-tells-customer-to-get-lawyer-subpoena-to-get-itemized-bill.shtml#c1781</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:45:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20110715/02212815101/verizon-tells-customer-to-get-lawyer-subpoena-to-get-itemized-bill.shtml#c1781</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm having a similar situation. I purchased an I-Phone by Verison and it stated I had 14 days to change my mind before the early termination fee was clausable. Well in five days I returned the phone and representative refunded my money for actual purchace of phone and stated I would receive the deposit for contract in the mail in five to seven days. Instead I received a bill for #$350 early termination fee. No one in their right mind would take the phone back only to have to pay that astranomical amount for termanation. In that case I would have kept the phone. Now Verizon of course has been calling me 3&amp;4 times daily,and I tried to explain-did no good. Now I'm getting private calls from them and it's now been turned over to collections which is destroying the credit I have been working so hard to get back. I've been to Verizon and another place,they gave me sound advise and a print out on the 14 day policy. So I refuse to sit back and let this ride. I will be fighting back. Total waste of my time and energy for something not even legel by their terms,but be sure I will get the messeage out there and they will have no more of my business or family and friends. WHAT A SHAME!!!! One unhappy customer,Dione:(]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>