<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/00483923515/nsas-lockbox-has-no-lock.shtml#c739</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:04:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/00483923515/nsas-lockbox-has-no-lock.shtml#c739</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So you are telling me that they'll behave and never look at data without a warrant despite it being readily available. Right.<br />
<br />
Then they say 9/11 could have been avoided if they had all that data. How do both statements fit together? The only possible way they could look at the data if available would be to have a court warrant which means they'd need to argue that there's a probable cause and this could only be done by normal police work which would have raised some data first.<br />
<br />
Providing a warrant is given, the telcos store metadata as what was collected for a good while thus making such preemptive surveillance completely unnecessary. Their own arguments kill each other.<br />
<br />
No really, just a peek.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c744</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:04:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c744</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, but when you compare the average income in India with the US, plus what percentage of the population have access to movies, I suspect that Bollywood can only do better in its current format.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c724</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:03:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c724</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The same could be said of a lot of US output.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c779</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:01:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c779</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Judging by the amount of times you inanely spam each and every thread irrelevantly, not in the slightest. Obviously youe man-crush isn't returned, and you are beneath notice.<br />
<br />
The only downside to your obsession is that I may stop bothering to show pinked-out comments and miss some of OotB's slightly more lucid rants.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c778</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:00:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c778</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Enjoy your tiny echo chamber, LOL!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c759</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:59:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c759</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ooo, Paulbot spam as well as AJ-froth.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c737</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:58:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c737</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, I think it's moved beyond crush and well into stalking.<br />
<br />
Aren't there some kind of cyberbullying laws that can be thrown at this clown? Because this very much sounds like self-admitted bullying to me!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>I hope he is wrong</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c297</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:57:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c297</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>I think the American public can accept the fact if you tell them that every time you pick up the phone, it</em>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c716</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:56:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c716</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because maybe it's idiotic spam. "Because he's scared of you" is a wild guess which is about as accurate as claims of WMDs in Iraq.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Of course...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c143</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Androgynous Cowherd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:56:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c143</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>What makes that particularly ridiculous, is that the pioneer of the three-strikes approach, France, is clearly backing away from it. For the UK to plough on with an outdated and discredited scheme regardless, is just farcical.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Of <i>course</i> it's farcical -- that's the UK's specialty! :)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c942</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:54:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c942</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sorry, who got censored where in this story?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c3117</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:52:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c3117</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's ok, I'm sure they don't want to return to any 'normal' that compares to right-wingers. After all, who wants to be compared to the bloke who 'goes Hulk' and *gains* IQ? ;)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Mike and Tolles against AG investigating Google for antitrust.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c930</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:52:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c930</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"Anyhoo, when more than one AG comes after you, it's just possible that you're engaged in fairly obvious fiddling."</i><br />
<br />
Nice appeal to authority there. Obviously there's no reason to believe that if one AG seeks to improve their chances of career advancement by grandstanding on a stupid issue like this, that others would jump on the bandwagon for the same ulterior motives. No, AG's clearly have moral superiority when in numbers...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11133123507/steve-wozniak-speaks-out-against-nsa-spying-this-is-not-my-america.shtml#c613</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Howard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:46:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11133123507/steve-wozniak-speaks-out-against-nsa-spying-this-is-not-my-america.shtml#c613</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There is always one who give in to the temptation :]<br />
<br />
But the trend in the latest week is promising. Sooner or later we starve them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c456</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:45:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c456</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[perhaps another tack would be to try to get the whole idea of the FISA court kicked out? from what i understand, it basically makes secret decisions that are unable to be disclosed, so stop that!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c912</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:44:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c912</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"...don't address the merits of anything I say."</i><br />
<br />
Very little you have to say at the moment has any merit. You have quite literally lowered yourself to the level of spam.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c901</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pragmatic]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:43:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c901</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think he's allowed to post here to demonstrate the lack of strength the pro-maximalists have for their arguments.<br />
<br />
I'd be very surprised if one popped up one day with a well-reasoned argument for his or her position. Hell, I might even pay attention to them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Had a think about it</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c90</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josef Anvil]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:41:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c90</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I just had to stop and think about all these "losses".<br />
<br />
It just seems like there are basically three types of "pirate".  <br />
<br />
A.  Those who cannot afford the content but want it.<br />
B.  Those that can afford the content but ONLY consume it BECAUSE it's free.<br />
C.  Those that can afford the content and WOULD purchase the content if it was not free. <br />
<br />
The problem with the content industry is that they count all three groups as a lost sale when ONLY group C is a lost sale. <br />
<br />
Then it gets even trickier.   Group C is most likely the smallest group and as the amount of choice increases, Group C starts to migrate into Group B. <br />
<br />
Then my head nearly exploded when I began to wonder why this is even an issue.  Watching the content via stream or download shouldn't even be a crime.  It's the person who illegally distributed the content who is actually breaking the law.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: That's nice, but WE live in terminally predatory capitalism.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c176</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pragmatic]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:38:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c176</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What can you expect from Left-wing Blue?<br />
<br />
Of all the Blues, only Rational Blue has anything of value to contribute. The others have only wild conspiracy ravings and tinfoil hattery that clogs up the comments and are quickly reported.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c880</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:37:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c880</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[this is the trouble when those that have more power than brains get into positions of having and wanting to use that power. without the brains to back up the thoughts, all thoughts, ideas etc become stupid! they dont have the part that brains give to balance out the bad things by bringing in the good, so the bad takes over. then, everything goes to rat shit and it takes an inordinate amount of time to correct. if these people were to learn to keep their mouths shut good and tight until their brains allowed them to open, perhaps these incidents would become less frequent? i am surprised they haven't just tried to shut down the whole internet and have done with it? perhaps when Ford or Chrysler gets sued for a driver running a child down, these fucking morons will see the error of their ways?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>