<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c453</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheogorath]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:24:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c453</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, gee, I don't know, Old Mugwump. Maybe because of the huge cost for the defendant of even meritless cases?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Apparently the Lt.Col. has never served...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1030</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[roderick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:23:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1030</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Apparently the Lt.Col. has never served in the combat MOS's."<br />
<br />
Grossman was an Army Ranger. His bio is not that difficult to find.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: use in commerce`</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c431</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ockham's Stubble]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:23:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c431</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If she had advertising supporting the site... that could qualify.<br />
<br />
Great, now you have me rationalizing on behalf of lawyers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c647</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:23:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c647</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How so?<br />
<br />
By making it LEGAL to take your stuff and make it work the way you want it to so you can use it for legitimate stuff?<br />
<br />
Like say, if I wanted to Jailbreak a Nintendo 3DS so I could import Japanese games, how is that taking rights away from Nintendo?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c729</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[kenichi tanaka]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:21:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c729</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[These police officers were doing their jobs. It's the hooligans who were filming these police officers who should have the book thrown at them by the judge for antagonizing these officers from doing their jobs.<br />
<br />
And, despite what you may want to believe, police officers have been doing random sobriety tests for years, even before this whole mess started regarding videotaping police officers while they are doing their jobs.<br />
<br />
I find it totally disingenuous that everyone is complaining about these cops doing their job and yet if they weren't doing their jobs, everyone would be complaining about "where are the police when these crimes are being committed"?<br />
<br />
It's funny how too many Americans are so concerned with filming these police officers while they are doing their job and these same Americans seem to be wearing their morals and ethics on their sleeves so that when the police aren't doing their jobs they make a 180 degree turn and ask "where are the police".<br />
<br />
Everytime I read about police arresting someone for videotaping them in public, I always notice how the police officers largely ignore these citizens who are videotaping them until these same citizens decide to take it upon themselves to approach these officers.<br />
<br />
Are these people stupid? You're going to approach an armed officer of the law while they are trying to lock down a crime scene or while they are trying to do their job and you want to interfere with them?<br />
<br />
These are the same citizens who would stand out in the middle of the freeway, hoping that some idiot in a semi truck will turn their vehicle away at the last minute.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c637</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Rhodes]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:20:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c637</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'll spell it out for you:<br />
<br />
* Copyright holders have many legal rights. <br />
* This does not imply that <i>every</i> legal right they have is related to copyright.<br />
* Previously, they had a legal right to prevent me from modifying my own property, even in situations where no copyright violation occurred.  <br />
* If this legislation passes, they will no longer have that right.  <br />
* The removal of that specific legal right has nothing to do with their legal copyrights, which are still in full force.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c636</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:19:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c636</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["" Under the proposed change, copyright holders would not have a claim against those that bypass access controls to engage in noninfringing uses.""<br />
<br />
If someone engages in noninfringing use then they are not breeching the law and as such a non infringing use would not be subjected to face action against a copyright holder as there would no breech of copyright for which a copyright holder would not be able to take action as no breech of copyright has occured.<br />
<br />
"" Thus, copyright holders would have LESS rights than they currently do.""<br />
<br />
You make it seem that copyright holders should have the right to take action against something that is non infringing and not in any way breeching copyright. Well if a copyright holder does not own the copyright to something then they have no right to take action against something that they don't own the copyright too. What you want is for the copyright holder not only to control what they own the copyright too but also to control the use of something that they do not own the copyright too also.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dear Ferrero SpA</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c428</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheogorath]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:19:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c428</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Until recently, I used to recommend your product, Nutella, over all others, but I will now instead recommend supermarket own brands on the basis that they taste very similar, have near identical nutritional values, and are a lot easier on the pocket. I have taken this decision in light of the fact that any promotion of your brands could lead to litigation, so I am now going to do the exact opposite.<br />
Yours <i>very</i> sincerely, Sheogorath.<br />
P.S. Ferrero Rocher are <i>not</i> 'eccellente'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c624</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:19:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c624</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think Mike's argument that this proposal wouldn't weaken "copyrights," assuming he means the exclusive rights under Section 106, is a red herring. His argument seems to be that since it's still illegal to violate the rights under 106, then permitting circumvention doesn't weaken those rights. But the very purpose of the anticircumvention provisions is to protect those 106 rights, and by weakening the provisions, those rights are not as fully protected. I personally don't have a problem with the DMCA, and I think that this proposal would in essence gut the efficacy of the provisions.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c6</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:18:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c6</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I saw this earlier today.  It's a bit shite because it is common practice to rent your property out like a B&amp;B here in the UK.<br />
<br />
My cousin had a property which he used to rent to holiday makers at times of festivals.  It is a good way for people to make a few extra quid.<br />
<br />
Also, if people are determined or not this would be next to impossible to enforce.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: average_joe</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c601</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Turing Institute]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:18:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c601</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Congratulations average_joe! Based on your logical fallacies, your countless attempts to debate "Mike", and your furious backpedaling on the current topic, the Institute has determined that you are not now, or ever have been, an artificial intelligence.  <br />
<br />
Further analysis indicates you are either: a meat puppet for Big Copyright, or a gerbil.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c597</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keroberos]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:15:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c597</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How does this weaken copyright? How does engaging in non-infringing uses have anything at all to do with copyright? This is the most idiotic argument I've heard on this subject. Non-infringing use of copyrighted material was always legal before the DMCA. Everything that was infringing and therefore illegal under the copyright laws from before the DMCA, will still be illegal if this passes. Everything that was infringing and therefore illegal under the copyright laws from after the DMCA, will still be illegal if this passes. What changes? Nothing, other than your masters loose some control that they shouldn't have had in the first place.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c408</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Applegate]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c408</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good Bye Nutella<br />
<br />
Hello "Kroger Hazelnut Chocolate Spread"<br />
<br />
Or I will just make my own.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1060</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Applegate]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1060</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>"if the listener takes offense to sexually related speech for any reason, no matter how irrationally or unreasonably, the speaker may be punished."</blockquote>Hey DOJ, DoEd, I am offended by your mandate, who gets to determine your punishment?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Your Post</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c1247</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donull]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c1247</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Very good post. <br />
<br />
I could read your blog all day. Intelligent, witty, &amp;c.<br />
<br />
Thank you,<br />
<br />
dc]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c594</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c594</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sony can kiss my arse.  I shall continue ignoring their shit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1023</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1023</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Given how much Grossman is ridiculed for his thesis, perhaps musicians in particular and people in general should abandon the belief in the phrase 'Music has charms to soothe the savage breast' ?<br />
<br />
Advertisers spend millions to convince people to buy anything from sugared water to sexy unmentionables because they and their target audience believe those messages, subtle and not so subtle, works. How much did those Stupor Bowl ad spots cost? It is possible to persuade people to buy and to soothe their rage, but impossible to provoke passion and persuade to kill?<br />
<br />
There is no comparison between the military and violent entertainment games. Grossman made clear those distinctions in his articles and two books: On Killing and On Combat. Both of which am willing to bet none of his critics here have read. On Killing is on the Marine Corps Commandant required reading list.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c387</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[OldMugwump]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c387</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why do people always cave immediately when they get a baseless C&amp;D letter? And then complain publicly about it?<br />
<br />
Why don't any of them simply say "Ha - you have no case. See you in court, asshole."?<br />
<br />
I don't get why people are so easily cowed.<br />
<br />
(BTW, I can't stand Nutella either.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c569</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Rhodes]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:12:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c569</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Me rooting my phone takes rights away from copyright holders?<br />
<br />
Explain.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c563</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chosen Reject]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:11:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c563</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree 100%.  My point above was simply that even if it were to exist, it shouldn't be part of title 17 of the US Code.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>