<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: If the system could be changed, do away with trolling entirely!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c126</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:37:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c126</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["problem with present system is LAWYERS"<br />
<br />
Most lawmakers are lawyers, THAT is the problem.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Just go ALL PRENDA, ALL THE TIME.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1344</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric The Fruit Bat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:35:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1344</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I smell a movie script in a few years...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c125</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:33:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c125</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Context try in sometime it makes the world less confusing"<br />
<br />
But, but, but zero tolerance!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Modern society must be changed</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1334</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[NWO]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:25:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1334</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I hope America turns into a Police State and all of your American freedoms are taken away. You are all slaves to your media! Hail the New World Order!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c811</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rekrul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:24:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c811</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>So how close does a drone have to be to someone's home before it becomes intrusive? Clearly, at some height the air is part of the sky commons that belongs to everyone, as a famous 1946 US Supreme Court decision laid down:<br />
<br />
<i>    The air is a public highway, as Congress has declared. Were that not true, every transcontinental flight would subject the operator to countless trespass suits. Common sense revolts at the idea.</i></b><br />
<br />
If that's true, why do you need special permits to fly model aircraft over a certain size or launch large rockets?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Other motives?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c201</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anon for now]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:19:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c201</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Someone pointed out on another discussion of these remarks, that Schmidt also has been promoting forced identification of users online.  If this were the law, then a company like Google would be in a position to delete (or just hide) info, but others who could not impose the strong authentication while collecting user data would be excluded.  In this light the proposal appears as a backwards argument for the ID scheme and boosting Google's power.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: The issue here is overprescription</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/07475922914/why-even-good-hospitals-doctors-are-obstacle-to-better-cheaper-healthcare.shtml#c357</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheogorath]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:18:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/07475922914/why-even-good-hospitals-doctors-are-obstacle-to-better-cheaper-healthcare.shtml#c357</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Who ever claimed US doctors gain insurance incentives for prescribing? Have you never wondered why pharmaceutical companies spend three times more on 'marketing' than on research and development?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Militarization</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1780</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:16:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1780</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, thanks to the DHS, they already have armored vehicles, so to answer your question: Soon.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.infowars.com/video-hundreds-of-dhs-armored-trucks-on-the-move/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.infowars.com/video-hundreds-of-dhs-armored-trucks-on-the-move/</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1758</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:12:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1758</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why stop with Misdemeanor charges? Misdemeanors don't mean much. Should've gone for Felony charges, that would have taught the students &amp; parents the lesson they clearly need to be taught.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c692</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rekrul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:11:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c692</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's getting to the point where you can be charged under the CFAA for simply looking at someone else's computer screen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c663</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rekrul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:08:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c663</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How many times must it be said:<br />
<br />
If you shoot video of cops breaking the law and/or abusing someone, make disseminating the video(s) your top priority! Upload them! Email them to someone, even yourself! Hide the memory card! Don't just sit around waiting for the cops to show up and confiscate the phone/camera/card!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c648</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:03:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c648</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[and if the cops really needed the video evidence for whatever reason they should have brought their own cameras and provided their own video evidence. That they failed is no one elses fault but their own. In fact, under these circumstances, it should have been their own responsibility to prove their innocence with their own cameras. They didn't meet that responsibility. They should be punished. <br />
<br />
They should separately pay for taking those cameras. The person whom the cameras was wrongfully taken from should be rewarded well. Do you know why? It will encourage more people to record the cops because, if they record the cops and the cameras are wrongfully taken, those making the recordings get rewarded. That is a good rule. Otherwise people will be discouraged from recording the cops knowing that they can get their cameras forcefully taken from them and not be compensated and accomplish nothing when the evidence is deleted. That's not a rule we want. The fact that these people had their cameras taken from them and should get compensation is independent on whether or not the cops are guilty of murder. Yes, the cops should be convicted of murder. But, separately, these people should be well compensated for having their cameras taken.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c636</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:57:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c636</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[See, you're missing the point. The authorities should be held accountable for the cameras being wrongfully taken regardless of whether or not the cops are really guilty of the murder. They wrongfully took that footage and they should pay just for that, separately.<br />
<br />
They should be convicted of murder, yes, but that's a separate issue. They should separately be punished for the wrongful confiscation of (potential) evidence.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c619</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:55:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c619</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[By the way, you oughta slow down a mite, bud.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c606</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:54:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c606</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Their phones were wrongfully taken. The cops should personally be held accountable for that. No legal technicality can change that.<br />
<br />
But I suppose cops getting away with murder and the forceful and wrongful confiscation and destruction of evidence is OK. People like you will defend them.<br />
<br />
That's just the American way, isn't it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1320</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CDW]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:53:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1320</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Writing his song and expressing his political opinions are not crimes.  It is so sick and so ugly that these idiots arrested him.  His free speech is no one else's business, and this sick reactionary society needs to look in the mirror.  The US government murders children in Pakistan, Yemen, Afganistan...every day, so it is the federal house of horrors, and if you're offended by his song, then that was probably his point.  Or is all provocative art terrorism?  Start arresting the drag queens again too.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c784</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:51:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c784</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"The Times lawyers specifically stated they would be okay with use of a different publication's content..."</i><br />
<br />
Wow, they've really taken the moral high road there. They're all pissy about someone building off their work, but don't care if you build off somebody <i>else's</i> work instead. Is this the copyright equivalent of NIMBY?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c584</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:48:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c584</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>What have they to gain here?</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Well, ain't they said they gonna sue?  <br />
<br />]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c672</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:35:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c672</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["You want any data related to you removed from google there is a button you can press to scrub yourself from their system. Otherwise if you don't want to give them access to the data you create you can feel free not to use their free services."<br />
<br />
Although on second read...I recall that one could do this but only if one is logged onto Google+...which means they are still tracking your every move and can target ads to you with the advertising companies they own.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c149</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not an Electronic Rodent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:34:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c149</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>...just as soon as they come up with unbreakable DRM</blockquote>They did.... but then they couldn't work out how to get the content to play afterwards... /tongue in cheek]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>