<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Just like a book deal, but worse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c357</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:37:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c357</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wish I was actually, I've seen several comments and even an article on this site where that idea is brought up, that unless money is changing hands fair use doesn't exist. <br />
<br />
The fact that fair use doesn't even remotely require payment, and in fact is directly contradictory of the idea behind fair use, is apparently beyond those that make that argument, but that doesn't stop them from doing so.<br />
<br />
Probably the most obvious claim  of 'no fair use that isn't paid use':<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130110/01515121624/lionsgate-censors-remix-video-that-copyright-office-itself-used-as-example-fair-use.shtml#comments' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130110/01515121624/lionsgate-censors-remix-video-that-copyright-office-itself-used-as-example-fair-use.shtml#comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c308</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:36:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c308</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Regardless of the patent B.S. these companies should help in his defense.  Don't be a dolt!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c283</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:35:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c283</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The book Applied Cryptography, an extensive work on the subject describes multiple-factor authentication.<br />
<br />
The book describes that at the most basic level, you can prove your identity three ways:<br />
1. Something you know (eg, password, PIN, etc)<br />
2. Something you have (eg, building key, electronic fob, etc)<br />
3. Something you are (eg, retina scan, fingerprint, voiceprint, etc)<br />
<br />
Banks have used two factor authentication for years.  An ATM wants something you Know (PIN) and something you have (plastic card).<br />
<br />
The military often uses something you Are and something you Know.  The guard must personally recognize you and you better know the password of the day.  Failure may result in getting shot -- especially around nukes.<br />
<br />
Google uses something you Know (password) and something you have (your mobile phone with a pre arranged app).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>BBM</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c311</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greggore]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:35:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c311</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Using BBM is not blocked by AT&amp;T. Full video chat and conferencing included. <br />
<br />
Monopolies are never good for anyone.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c263</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:34:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c263</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You have to consider all the pressure this must be putting on him.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c255</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:34:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c255</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think it's a desperation attempt by him because his funds have been wrongfully frozen. Now he's not thinking very clearly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c249</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:33:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c249</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Of course he's a patent troll (or acting like one in this case at least). Nothing in the article denies that.<br />
<br />
"Is that it?"<br />
<br />
Yes, apparently Mike has to use very specific language in his articles, else morons will come and attack him. Do you have a problem with any of the points in the article, or are you just the latest in a long line of people to whine whenever Mike doesn't write what you want him to like? You certainly seem to be using the same tactics as the other idiots rather than address anything actually said. "Not a regular commenter" my ass.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: &amp;amp;quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&amp;amp;quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c236</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:33:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c236</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Ownership and attribution are entirely separate concerns. Duh."<br />
<br />
Right, and even if you don't put your name in it, you can still claim the copyright later if you can prove that you did it.<br />
<br />
Try again, blue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c336</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:32:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c336</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[my point was that it has happened that fanfic has been published with some success in the past, though I appreciate the correction.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c321</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:32:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c321</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[NO, not in my guesstimate. You can't really give it away for free. Nearly all is horribly dull meandering dreck that appeals only to writer, though a few others of similar mania will give timid approval in their on-line Mutual Admiration Societies. But in the wider realm, it's simply lame, derivative, over-blown, over-contrived, self-aggrandizing, unrealistic crap such as Timothy Geigner, aka Dark Helmet, strains to write. -- Besides that, if taken from television, most of the appeal is in "the visuals", simply doesn't work as text. And stilted dialogue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c211</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:30:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c211</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well try again then.<br />
It's clearly stating that despite Kim making a bad move and being a dick, there's a strong case for others to support him.<br />
<br />
I bet you were home schooled...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c190</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:29:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c190</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How much money are you paid for this crap?<br />
<br />
The only thing more insane than your comments are the people who pay you money to do this.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c189</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:29:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c189</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maybe it' that, maybe if the DoJ's crazy secondary liability ideas don't get kicked to the curb Google is likely in the firing lines.<br />
<br />
How do you manage to post so often without actually reading the article?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c159</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[OldGeezer]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:28:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c159</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[My bank's web site has been doing this for some time. I would think that the fact that this is such a common practice shows that there is nothing unique or patentable. Patents on such general concepts can only be used for one thing: trolling. I seriously doubt that anyone was even aware of Dotcom's patent and made a decision to steal it. This is not going to help him in his legal problems. It just makes him look so hypercritical.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c171</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:28:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c171</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I read the article. What the fuck does this mean:<br />
<br />
<i>That's actually a pretty good reason for the tech industry to think about participating in the case even if they don't like Dotcom at all and don't want to be associated with him.</i><br />
<br />
To me, it implies that it's OK for these companies to capitulate to a patent troll because the ends justify the means.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c157</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akari Mizunashi]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:27:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c157</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, as unpleasant as the demand looks, it's a sad state of affairs that those who are in this world have to use threats like this all the time.<br />
<br />
Personally, I see this as no different than Google's buyouts of patents. "Don't sue us or else!"<br />
<br />
I mean, by now everyone should know these laws aren't about protection of "rights".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;reasonably monetize what might be considered infringement under the law&amp;quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c316</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:26:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c316</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm sorry to do this, but someone has to:<br />
<br />
Slavery was proven to work for more than two thousand years.<br />
<br />
Should we stick to that?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Already Long Established By Pete Abrams</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c203</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[harknell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:25:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c203</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pete Abrams, the creator of the webcomic "Sluggy Freelance" has had a system in place for a very long time called "The Defenders of the Nifty", which is essentially a subscription system to help him continue to make the comic. While he does have some special extras for these people, and gives them some info in advance, they primarily just want to support his work. If you have a strong enough fanbase this can work well--part of that "1000 True Fans" idea that came out a few years ago.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c154</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:24:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c154</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[But, but... this is different. It's <i>Kim Dotcom!!!</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c135</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Howard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:22:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c135</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[read the fuckin' article you chump]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>