<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: So what's your precious Pandora EXCEPT gatekeeper?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c80</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nigel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:51:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c80</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A deliverer of music that I like to listen to.  I couldn't care less if I get an ad every once in a while. <br />
<br />
Pandora is a very sound alternative and artists would be getting paid a lot more if they were not GETTING RAPED BY THE GATEKEEPERS.<br />
<br />
Nice try though, your wheel of an argument is missing the spokes.<br />
<br />
Offering up content via completely untenable modalities is just another way the rubes in suits get to keep all the cash.<br />
<br />
Nigel]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>still corrupt</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c116</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[mdb007]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:51:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c116</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Guess the 60 minutes story from a few years ago still holds true, most corrupt police force in the country. what A$$holes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c357</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny L]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:51:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c357</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Normally that is the case here in Sweden too, which is one reason why this law has been hotly debated before it was passed in the Riksdagen (the Parliament). In fact, you can normally do whatever you like with the pictures you own, with no permissions required from people in the photo, the theory being that it is the photographer who owns the rights to the image, not the people in the picture. (Although you can be subject to libel suits if the photo subjects are portrayed negatively, and you are generally not allowed to use photographs without model releases in advertising.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>still corrupt</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c114</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[mdb007]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:50:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c114</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Guess the 60 minutes story from a few years ago still holds true, most corrupt police force in the country. what A$$holes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: So what's your precious Pandora EXCEPT gatekeeper?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c73</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackn]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:49:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c73</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I guess other people don't understand what a gatekeeper is. what an idiot.<br />
<br />
Nothing is worse than broadcast radio. dude, traditional radio (for music), is a relic of the past. They have gatekept themselve out of the future.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stands to Reason</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c60</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nigel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:45:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c60</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["removal of intermediaries" would mean them of course.  As they provide no additional or inherent value other than to restrict when and how folks can watch stuff I fail to see the problem.  <br />
<br />
Nevermind their checkbooks of course.<br />
<br />
At least the tone of the piece was civil.<br />
<br />
Nigel]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c36</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:44:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c36</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The sad part is, despite it being an essay, it'll still be treated as fact and "research."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>SMITH IS A MASSIVE FRAUD</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120920/00591220442/entrepreneur-magazine-sued-allegedly-defrauding-trademark-office.shtml#c831</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[rick c]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:44:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120920/00591220442/entrepreneur-magazine-sued-allegedly-defrauding-trademark-office.shtml#c831</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I dislike Entrepreneur's attacks on small business. I'm a small business owner who had to change my name also. But Scoot Smith isn't doing another any favors at all. In fact he is making things worse for us. I don't know what's going through he mind. His company's website isn't active at all. You would think a so called entrepreneur would actually be ONE. Does anyone know what he has actually done for the last 15 years but whine and sue and loose? In court papers he actually states that Bizstarz has NO VALUE!!!!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>So what's your precious Pandora EXCEPT gatekeeper?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c25</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:42:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c25</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That forces you to listen to ads, doesn't let you skip more a few, OR you can pay to avoid that? It's worse than radio!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c756</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:42:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c756</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why? Too many facts for you to deal with?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c110</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:41:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c110</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Any other job pulling this kind of shit would result in immediate termination.  <br />
<br />
In the police world, there are either no consequences or they are put on a "PAID" vacation.. er Suspension.<br />
<br />
I understand they have a job that can't be good for their mental health, they don't exactly get to deal with happy people everywhere they go, but this is just unacceptable.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c740</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:40:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c740</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Then what was the point to the DOJ's case?<br />
Now that the servers have been wiped, isn't the case dead?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c735</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:37:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c735</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The ironic thing is that even if the DOJ loses, the DOJ wins. I think the plan all along was to ruin Kim's business by whatever means possible. Getting Kim convicted would have been the icing on the cake, but it was never the main objective. The MAFIAA got its cake, the DOJ got its money and everyone is happy. Except for Kim and those who lost their legitimate files.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c91</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:36:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/17584023513/new-orleans-cops-set-up-private-company-to-fill-pockets-with-red-light-camera-cash.shtml#c91</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[did the NSA have tabs on this? how did they manage to commit this crime under their watchful surveillance eye? i suppose the answer will be that it wasn't worth the attention, in which case WHY DID THE ACTIVITIES OF MILLIONS OF ORDINARY PEOPLE WARRANT IT?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>What's in a name</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c730</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spaceman Spiff]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:34:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c730</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think it should be renamed "The Department of Just Us", since it's staff seems to believe that only they can determine the law...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c727</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:32:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c727</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You do realize that the judge didn't agree that there was any evidence on those servers that needed to be saved, right? How could this hurt the DOJ's case, Mike?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Oh, I doubt the mythical exculpatory evidence!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c717</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:32:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c717</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ever heard of innocent until proven guilty you chucklefuck? <br />
<br />
What about the right to a fair trial? <br />
<br />
Nah, didn't think that facts have anything to do with your bullshit troll posts on techdirt.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c703</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bergman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:30:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c703</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lack of funds is irrelevant when dealing with evidence of a crime.  Which is more expensive, keeping a few backups or going to prison for 5-10 years for evidence tampering?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1262</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:28:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1262</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm your huckleberry.<br />
<br />
"The evidence is that the Article III judges who looked at the evidence said it was relevant."<br />
<br />
No, the third-hand report given in three layers of double-speak from politicians who skipped the actual briefing "is that the judges who looked at "it" said it was relevant.' <br />
<br />
There is NO evidence. There are secrets. Faith-based?  We're the skeptics here.  You're the one believing the unsupported, baldly equivocated, constantly conflicting and confused reports of politicians who don't actually even know what happened but who want you to be sure that everything is okay.  Faith-based my ass!<br />
<br />
And yes, when they have gotten ALL the data, the 0.03% rejection rate is plenty good enough proof that the review process is bullshit.  <br />
<br />
When a US Senator can say, "here's MY phone, you have MY data, what facts supported what reasonable suspicion relevant to what investigation led you to be able to get MY contact list?" and you can't give him an answer because "Um, er, uh, the terrorists might get us if I answer that, Mr. Senator" then yes, it's all bullshit.<br />
<br />
That's not milk.  That's meat.  Suck on it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c541</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:28:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c541</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's strange. There seems to be no way of adding comments. Perhaps a little one-sided, I feel. It all looks like someone who is totally desperate because nobody is actually listening to the ravings of a blithering idiot. There also seems to more than just a hint of paranoia creeping in here. Perhaps a visit to a psychiatrist would the order of the day OOTB, before you burn yourself out with all this totally unjustified venom? I would hope that the abuse facility will be well-used.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>