<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Kickstarter project instead of a petition...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12283223188/petition-asks-obama-to-support-treaty-blind-rather-than-siding-with-hollywood.shtml#c78</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CSMcDonald]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:01:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12283223188/petition-asks-obama-to-support-treaty-blind-rather-than-siding-with-hollywood.shtml#c78</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They'd be better off turning to Kickstarter and raising funds to buy off the politicians to properly compete with the various copyright lobbyists.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c156</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Cline]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:59:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c156</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>So, it sounds like Lutz should pay this one...</blockquote>But that's taking food from the mouth's of Lutz's non-existent children!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Prosecute him for improper DMCA takedown notice!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c175</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:55:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c175</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["There, took me two seconds to turn it on you with one of your own themes."<br />
<br />
Maybe next time you should put in two seconds of thought to see if your point is valid.<br />
<br />
He never claims this is a DMCA notice, mostly because it isn't one.  Sending a DMCA notice to the infringer would make no sense, since they're not covered by the safe harbors anyway.  A DMCA notice actually says "under penalty of perjury", which he does not state in this email - and if he's not stating anything under penalty of perjury, then he's obviously not committing perjury.  Additionally, he owns the copyright, and that's the only thing that is covered by the "under penalty of perjury" part of a DMCA notice anyway.<br />
<br />
So... um, what was your point supposed to be, again?<br />
<br />
"Since when does "fair use" require attribution, and even if did, how are you going to enforce attribution without the exact same copyright regimen?"<br />
<br />
Indeed, fair use does not require attribution (although it would seem the polite thing to do.)  Maybe he's claiming this isn't fair use.  And if it is NOT fair use, then he'd have the right to set conditions like attribution.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Support laborers, not the thieving Rich!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12283223188/petition-asks-obama-to-support-treaty-blind-rather-than-siding-with-hollywood.shtml#c60</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:54:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12283223188/petition-asks-obama-to-support-treaty-blind-rather-than-siding-with-hollywood.shtml#c60</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Words are hard for you to understand, aren't they? It's okay.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Support laborers, not the thieving Rich!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12283223188/petition-asks-obama-to-support-treaty-blind-rather-than-siding-with-hollywood.shtml#c45</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:52:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12283223188/petition-asks-obama-to-support-treaty-blind-rather-than-siding-with-hollywood.shtml#c45</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Where do you stand in that battle, Mike? ... Sheesh, what an emo. You keep using "the blind" for an emotional appeal to overturn copyright, just use ANY angle that you can. Yet your efforts here bring such small results that I wonder why you bother.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>That would be a good thing</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c145</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:51:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c145</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What matters is that their funds and assets get taken. Take all their companies too. Even if it requires multiple fines/charges etc... <br />
Then go in for the removal of their jobs.<br />
The victims need that justice.<br />
<br />
<br />
AF Holdings going bankrupt would be a win. The noose tightens and there are loses.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Better than TV!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c137</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ArJayK]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:51:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c137</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This whole story is better than a TV show! Villains, heroes, courtroom drama featuring lies, half-truths, missing documents, forged signatures, not so competent lawyers, betrayals...<br />
<br />
Evey time I check Techdirt lately, I feel like bringing popcorn and a soda.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c521</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:37:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c521</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He never should have signed on for a percentage of "net profits".....<br />
<br />
You would think being a lawyer (and not just some famous movie star) he would have had a little better understanding of how things were going to play out... Meaning his 'firm' was never going to show any profit from these efforts, all the funds will be in some offshore shell companies.<br />
<br />
Consumers pay $1,000,000 in 'settlements'<br />
Prenda - charges $2,000,000 in processing and handling fees<br />
Shell companies - pocket $1,000,000 in cash and $2,000,000 in processing and handling fees.<br />
<br />
I know it doesn't make any sense... IP math is HARD]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>it's called innovation</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c894</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[alanbleiweiss]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:32:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c894</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just because something did not have an original intent to be used in a certain way does not mean it should not be used in a new way if that way is innovative and provides value to the world.<br />
<br />
Anything other than that understanding is called myopic thinking.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c682</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Millais]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:22:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c682</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As you said, they are in a public place. It would be improper to broadcast any footage disclosing the identities of the civilians, but I'm not sure the act of filming them can be said to be an invasion of privacy, even if they don't want cameras on them. And we've already established that cops don't have the right to privacy in these situations.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c876</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[aldestrawk]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:22:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c876</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The use of robots.txt is in no way a security measure. It was never intended to be and definitely should not be used as such. It is simply intended to relieve servers of unnecessary traffic as a result of spiders actions. Any script kiddie can do the same thing as a spider and intentionally ignore the request that robots.txt files represent.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: @&quot;the public do not respect copyright.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c162</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:19:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/00412423167/fair-use-me-not-thee.shtml#c162</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA['Common misconception' is more accurate than the term common law.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12283223188/petition-asks-obama-to-support-treaty-blind-rather-than-siding-with-hollywood.shtml#c24</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franklin G Ryzzo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:18:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/12283223188/petition-asks-obama-to-support-treaty-blind-rather-than-siding-with-hollywood.shtml#c24</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It really is a sad state of affairs that this is even an issue requiring a petition.  Hopefully the goal will be reached, but I don't think this is mainstream enough to get promoted where people will see it like happened with SOPA and the Library of Congress.  Although, with 300 million blind people out there, only a very small percentage would need to be made aware to get the signatures... <br />
<br />
Signed]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>since most police cars have dash cameras....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c677</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:17:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c677</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[why are they pointing what they consider a 'deadly' weapon at everyone, and why did they walk in front of it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1219</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Millais]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:15:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1219</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're good at detecting sarcasm. :)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>crticial thinking</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c874</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[alanbleiweiss]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:12:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c874</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[it sure as hell can be both.  While robots.txt is not by original nature related to search engines, a means of security, Google has the power and resources to respect it for the sake of security.  If you don't grasp that, not my problem.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c746</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:12:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c746</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[All these comments clearly show how desperate some people are to shut down any conversation that might educate people about IP issues. You don't want people to really understand this stuff because then people might also begin to understand the incredible damage being done in the name of "protecting artists". Pointing out a significant error like this is shouted down as being nitpicking. "Nothing to see here, move along!" It's hilariously inept but it highlights the creeping desperation on the part of copyright maximilists who see the public PR battle being steadily lost.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Turnabout is fair play</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1204</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Techanon]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:10:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1204</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Doesn't DMCA work just like this (except for the requirement of irrefutable evidence of non-infringement to reinstate content)?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c737</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:08:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c737</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Everybody needs a hobby.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c130</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:56:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/10542823205/another-court-tells-prenda-to-pay-up-attorneys-fees.shtml#c130</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's my opinion that Steele is the one pulling the strings for all these entities along with Hansmeier. Steele and Hansmeier went to Law School together in Minnesota and started Steele Hansmeier together.<br />
<br />
Lutz is a Paralegal who has worked for various Steele entities. Lutz in that brilliant Q&amp;A with the Judge in Nyugen Case in florida ( where coincidentally Steele was present for a Prenda case...what are the odds!)<br />
<br />
Lutz all of a sudden after Judge Wright put forth his Order To Show Cause, becomes CEO of AF Holdings and a bunch of it's entities and Brett Gibbs becomes Lawyer of Record for AF Holdings.<br />
<br />
So Lutz who couldn't even answer the remotest questions about Sunlust Pictures and AF Holdings, and basic questions about who works there and claimed in the Q&amp;A with the Judge to be just a "1099 contractor" is a mastermind able to organize Copyright Assignments and buying said copyrights and setting up LLC's and offshore trust's?<br />
<br />
Yeah and Elvis is alive and working at 7-11. Lutz has worked for Steele for years and was the voice on the other end of those phone calls looking for Settlements that were robo-dialed to subscribers.<br />
<br />
Now suddenly he is the corporate CEO master of business. Yes I doubt that. If you recall in the Deposition Of Hansmeier who appeared on the Behalf of AF Holdings (lordy, another coincidence!) couldn't name any officers of the company and that no one drew a salary every from there that he was aware.<br />
<br />
Who knew Mark Lutz was such a humanitarian in working for all these companies and entities for free as CEO (of course while managing to do robo-calls and demanding settlement payments)<br />
<br />
I wish I could make that historic rise form Debt collecting and Para-legal work to CEO. Lutz ought to give the good folks at MIT a call and relish them with his tale of how he rose from debt collector for Stelle to CEO of mnay companies, LLC's and offshore trusts.<br />
<br />
Truly the American dream!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>