<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WHOA! Stop at: &quot;everyone just wants stuff for free&quot;.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1367</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:09:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1367</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>I'm not asking Mike to debate me HERE.</em><br />
<br />
Even if we believed that (which none of us here do), it's still completely wrong.<br />
<br />
You have, repeatedly, asked Mike to debate you in these very comments.<br />
<br />
Examples:<br />
<blockquote>What variables are there? How are they weighted? How does one measure them? And what about all the things that simply cannot be measured? How do you account for that?[...]<br />
<br />
Thoughts? I'd love to hear the details of how you think we obtain and agree upon this data. [...]<br />
<br />
Let's assume that it's true that the biggest infringers are the biggest spenders. So what? What exactly do you think we should do about that fact, Mike?</blockquote><br />
In response to Mike's rational silence to your insulting and irrational comments, you insult him personally and misrepresent everything he's said on this site:<br />
<blockquote>Mike never takes a concrete stand on copyright. He pretends like he is completely unable to form a solid opinion on things. And he claims that since he doesn't know something for a fact with 100% certainty, he is unable to form an opinion on it. [...]<br />
<br />
Yeah, I'm pointing out that he isn't saying anything concrete or helpful. [...]<br />
<br />
Does Mike tell us how to measure the progress? No. It's high-level rhetoric. [...]<br />
<br />
I enjoy pointing out that Mike is too scared to ever talk about the specifics of his beliefs about copyright. [...]<br />
<br />
Where does Mike explain his personal beliefs about the morality of infringement? No where. [...]<br />
<br />
[Mike] wants to promote the progress so long as we don't do it by granting to authors exclusive rights. It's important to pretend like the two aren't interrelated since he hates the means so much. [...]<br />
<br />
You fit right in with Mike's Army. With that logic, we should chuck every single thing that exists on earth.</blockquote><br />
You're not here for debate. You're not giving your impartial opinion. You are nothing other than an extremist advocate, whose motivations are to smear anyone who disagrees with your radical agenda.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1350</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:48:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1350</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>I don't get your point.</em><br />
<br />
Let's apply it to scientific progress.<br />
<br />
Did David Hume actually tell us how to measure the speed of light in a vacuum? No, he didn't.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, Hume gave us a "framework" for discovering how light traveled in a vacuum. That framework was <em>empirical science.</em> Hume said that unless your data about how fast light traveled was accompanied by actual, measured, empirical data, it shouldn't even be considered a scientific discovery.<br />
<br />
Mike is saying something similar. Unless potential copyright statutes can actually be empirically proven to provide a public benefit, they should not be considered "good" copyright statutes. This is entirely in accord with copyright law, from the Founders forward. If, on the other hand, copyright statutes are only alleged to be for the public benefit, without any data whatsoever to back this assertion up, then they should be disregarded - exactly as Hume disregarded any scientific theory that was not based on empirical evidence.<br />
<br />
The fact that it has taken copyright law centuries to catch up to scientific theory, says that copyright law is outdated, illogical, and not even remotely scientific. It condemns copyright law to the same kind of "truthiness" that said that the sun revolves around the earth.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Am I not surprised</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/14465423109/aps-attempt-drming-news-shuts-down.shtml#c92</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hostile Elite]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:46:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/14465423109/aps-attempt-drming-news-shuts-down.shtml#c92</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Media is the prostitute of the Banking community. this is not left vs right, GOP vs Dems, Socialism vs liberty. This is war against White people.<br />
<br />
Why do hostile globalist elite defend Israel as a Jewish ethnostate with Jewish only immigration, but ravage White majority Europe/North America into a multi-ethnic, multi-cultural Gulag with dystopian non-White colonization?<br />
<br />
The world is 93% non-White, only 7% White. But 3rd world colonizers are aggressively advancing their agenda to annihilate gullible Whites, just as China annihilates Tibet.<br />
<br />
How long will gullible Whites cuckold for murderous anti-White elite, who confiscate our guns, infiltrate/subvert our banks/FBI/CIA, indoctrinate White kids in academia/mass media, plunder White jobs/wages, &amp; butcher White soldiers in bankrupting wars?<br />
<br />
"Native" Americans! invaded from East Asia. Yellow &amp; Brown races committed 10-times more genocide, slavery, imperialism than Whites. Since Old-Testament, Whites have been victims of Jewish/Crypto-Jewish, Turkic, Muslim, N.African imperialism, slavery, genocide.<br />
<br />
Gullible Whites should reject subversive ideologies- libertarianism/feminism/liberalism- &amp; reject hostile slanders of racism. Love to all humanity, but White people must organize to advance their interests, their fertility, their homelands. Spread this message. Reading list: goo.gl/iB777 , goo.gl/htyeq , amazon.com/dp/0759672229 , amazon.com/dp/1410792617]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cellphone videos not yet released</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/18051923103/footage-lethal-beating-deleted-seized-phone-sheriff-asks-fbi-to-take-over-investigation.shtml#c896</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:45:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/18051923103/footage-lethal-beating-deleted-seized-phone-sheriff-asks-fbi-to-take-over-investigation.shtml#c896</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[According to a story from Bakersfield TV channel 17, analysis of the cellphone videos is not yet complete.  <br />
<br />
Earlier reports had indicated the cellphone videos could be released to the public on Friday, but now this article says that analysis of the videos may not be finished until Monday or Tuesday of next week.  It is not entirely clear whether the videos will ever be released.<br />
<br />
<br />]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Here's the FCC's reasoning:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1226</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:39:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1226</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's great, you googled their reason.<br />
<br />
That doesn't mean their reason is actually accurate, just that it's their reason.<br />
<br />
If there's potential for interference with networks on the ground, there should be evidence supporting as such. Seeing as "the technical information provided was insufficient to prove (that it would not interfere with networks on the ground)", rather than stating that there was evidence that devices still interfered, it can be inferred that there is no evidence. (You don't say "there's no evidence I haven't been shot," you'd say "I've been shot.")<br />
<br />
And frankly, it still comes back to: if planes can be adversely affected by devices sold by teenagers at Best Buy that a large portion of the US population has, the problem isn't the phones. It's the planes, and whoever set up such a stupid system.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120504/03253518776/how-can-you-tell-if-uploading-your-cover-song-to-youtube-is-infringing-you-cant.shtml#c585</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Walker]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:07:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120504/03253518776/how-can-you-tell-if-uploading-your-cover-song-to-youtube-is-infringing-you-cant.shtml#c585</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I've read from top to bottom on this (including comments) trying to get some insight as I wish to start a music channel on YouTube somewhere in the near future and have been set back quite a bit as I would have started off doing covers to try  gain an audience but to be honest I'm absolutely clueless now, I don't know how it works? The bigger YouTube cover artists like Tyler Ward, Alex Goot etc. Would they make money from the covers they produce or must they pay to do them? I'm much more confused than I was before I read this..]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Saudi Religious Police</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c726</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:39:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c726</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>All religions -- it doesn't matter which one -- eventually lose their</i><br />
<br />
Or they never really had one. Exhibit A: the old Testament.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1212</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:37:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1212</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[so as an electronics engineer you would be aware of the many fault modes that can result in spurious radiation ?<br />
<br />
or that the miles and miles of wire in an aircraft make a very nice antenna system ?<br />
<br />
That if you were going to engineer an aircraft with the EMC shielding, it would be too heavy to fly ? <br />
<br />
That a 1% error on your heading setting when moving at 500Kmh could make the different between hitting a mountain or not ?<br />
<br />
Or that the digital communications used on phones creates significant harmonic radiation ?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: A sad misunderstanding</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1327</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:36:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1327</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[" But none of that means that rights protection is synonymous with promoting the progress"<br />
<br />
I think that you are trying to apply an incredibly narrow black and white approach to something that is many shades of grey.<br />
<br />
It would be hard for you to honestly deny that ownership and control of an end product is good for artists.  Being able to sell or market their works in a manner that helps them to support themselves as artists in the future always promotes the progress, it allows the best artists to continue being artists.<br />
<br />
Do you think it is fair that an artist who paints a picture can sell the picture (or charge admission to see it, if they want), but a musician, computer programmer, movie actor, or writer should somehow be denied that right because their works are more easily put in a digital format?<br />
<br />
Without some form of protection, there is a good possiblity that many of today's top artists would not be able to be artists on a full time basis, and would instead have to spend their time earning a living in other ways.  Some of those ways may be related to their art, but for many it would be the good old 9 to 5 J.O.B. and not much more.<br />
<br />
Promotion the progress and rights protection are not mutually exclusive, and so far, few arguments show that rights protection harms those who choose to freely distribute their work.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120104/04252517273/spanish-government-adopts-its-own-version-sopa-sinde-law-approved.shtml#c201</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Wilson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:35:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120104/04252517273/spanish-government-adopts-its-own-version-sopa-sinde-law-approved.shtml#c201</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Given that the Sinde Law seems comparable to SOPA, I'm all for the protesting this anti-piracy law.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c2162</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rekrul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:33:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c2162</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>It is much easier for someone to plant cameras in such places if they are after such pictures.</b><br />
<br />
Much easier than starting the video recorder, or setting the Glass to take a photo every nth second before entering the lockerroom and then walking around acting normal?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1320</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiterkansas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:33:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1320</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I can't think of anything more utterly petty than this response. Your whole life is wrapped up attacking some guy that runs a blog. I'm glad it entertains you so much. I will avoid reading anything you contribute in the future.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c711</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:31:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c711</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>You have your opinion but consider one half of humanity <br />
disagrees. </i><br />
<br />
[citation needed]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130426/10363322853/make-art-not-law.shtml#c83</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:29:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130426/10363322853/make-art-not-law.shtml#c83</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think it's fair use.  Or it would be mean of the original source to sue me.  Or the license was too expensive.  You pick, they are all standard excuses.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c701</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:27:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c701</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Monarchies have performed well in the past, don't be a hater.</i><br />
<br />
Name three monarchies that weren't build on crimes against peasants. Hell, name one.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c685</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:25:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c685</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>While us Americans love freedom, it may not always be best.</i><br />
<br />
Says who?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1204</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:24:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1204</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[yes, blutooth uses 2.4Ghz, and air traffic control uses about 137Mhz, I can see how they are so close!!<br />
<br />
Blutooth uses spread spectrum, ATC uses VHF, Amplitude Modulation narrow spectrum.<br />
<br />
The radio antennas for VHF comms to aircraft are usually mount of the fuselage forward of the wings and aft of the cockpit, or sometimes on the tail section, they are Omni-directional, and it's the aircrafts weather radar that is mounted in the nose cone and using parabolic dishes and directional antennae.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: I don't think Nintendo is wrong, but...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c266</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:23:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c266</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>That's the main reason they get a free pass</i><br />
<br />
The upcoming backlash doesn't look like a free pass to me.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c65</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr.Spothawk]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:21:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c65</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>The second problem is the failure to recognize that people value some products and services provided by our fellow meat-sacks.</blockquote><br />
<br />
This is only true in the case that meat-sacks make 'better' products, like the example of the antiquated rug. But that's an exception to the rule. <br />
<br />
Robots enable technologies we couldn't have dreamt about in history. If there's still a market for handmade circuit-boards, I'll bet it's not sufficient to employ even 1% of the workforce that robots have put out of work. These new circuits are much better than the old ones... and smaller and more durable and more energy efficient. <br />
<br />
There's no market for handmade processors. There's no market for Low Frequency Trading... only people who don't have the ability to make High Frequency Trading happen. <br />
<br />
Yes, people will retrain. But suggesting that we'll all make artisan versions of what we make today is just silly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c249</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:21:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c249</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Nintendo is well within their rights to monetize these videos and images</i><br />
<br />
Are they? I think this is questionable. Zach (presumably) has paid for the games he is recording. Why should Nintedo get to double-dip?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>