<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c219</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:57:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c219</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[arent you putting the chicken before the egg here?<br />
<br />
what site do they "know" are commiting criminal acts? in what country? were they convicted? or just alleged? <br />
<br />
or are you talking only about the pirate bay and its case in sweden? the site wasnt on trial, the operators of the site were. and they were only accessories, not criminals.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c199</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:57:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c199</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yep, just like the transportation authority is an accomplice to drunk drivers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c188</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:56:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c188</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apparently the problem is that no one taught you critical thinking.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c703</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:51:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c703</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[All I've got are accusations and insults because that's all he deserves with this crap. He makes bold pronouncements of how their position is bullshit without ever explaining either the arguments or the counter arguments on the merits. This is just another mindless hit piece. The only purpose of this article is to discredit copyright, yet again. It's total bullshit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Never leave home without one!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c238</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spaceman Spiff]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:51:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c238</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Never go into a police, FBI, or other "law enforcement" interview without your attorney present. Always assert your 5th Amendment rights and don't say ANYTHING unless your attorney tells you to, and don't even then if you can help it. These asshats can be incredibly intimidating, and infer that if you don't talk to them you will spend a gazillion years in stir. The thing is, is that they will take everything you say out of context, add their own spin, and then get you convicted and put away for a gazillion years for something you DIDN'T actually say!  So, being questioned by law enforcement? SAY NOTHING! ASK FOR AN ATTORNEY (your own if you have one)! REFUSE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c691</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Millais]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:49:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c691</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You want to have a conversation based on the merits of your post, yet your post is pure ad hominem.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>the folks on TD who can't stand it when their leader is challenged</blockquote><br />
<br />
Like any blog, this one attracts more than its share of readers whose opinions are aligned with those of its contributors. And like most popular blogs, the writers know their audience, and both consciously and subconsciously write for it.<br />
<br />
Yet, for some reason, you envision Techdirt readers as an obedient, unthinking cult, hanging on Masnick's every word and regarding him as their "leader". You regard all the readers - except those agree with you, I bet - as unable to formulate positions and arguments on their own, unwilling to see that his posts are mainly griping and shit-stirring.<br />
<br />
Like I said, he knows his audience - he can certainly whip us up into a pissed-off comment frenzy - but we know him, as well. You guys keep trying to point out to us what's <i>really</i> going on, not realizing that <i>we already know</i>, and it <i>doesn't matter</i>, because most of the time, he's not saying anything we don't <i>already</i> agree with.<br />
<br />
Mike and his guest bloggers just relay reports of outrageous things that the IP industry is up to, and they often express their opinions about it, and we all chime in with ours. It's as simple as that. He doesn't have us under mind control. He's not our "leader". One misstep and we'll turn on him...for that one post, which is how it should be.<br />
<br />
This "leader" fixation is a generational thing. Mike's generation, the Gen Xers, distrust power and leaders in general, starting with their parents. The younger Millennials laugh at would-be leaders and rarely conflate celebrity with authority. But the older generation, the Baby Boomers - good god, they revere and exalt as ideologues anyone who's got anyone's attention, and can't comprehend the idea that everyone must be following someone. Of course there are exceptions to these trends, but I'm guessing you're in this camp, born before the 1970s. Am I right?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>The article headline?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c236</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:47:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c236</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Was the article headline intended to imply that the FIB actually <i>has</i> credibility?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lop-sided</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c231</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[slick8086]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:47:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c231</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is a federal offense for you to lie to them, but they are allowed to lie to you during an interview.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: ^Unprecedented QUAD POSTS! Hooray!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c177</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_my_ass]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:43:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c177</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[4x as many posts to report than usual.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c167</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:42:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c167</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm glad to see that prosecutorial overreach isn't just restricted to the US.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c688</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:37:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c688</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The drafts are public.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>^Unprecedented QUAD POSTS! Hooray!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c158</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:37:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c158</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Previously, clicking stop at obvious pause and clicking submit again has not resulted in multiples. Live and learn.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c674</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:35:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c674</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I said this before and I'll say it again:<br />
<br />
<b>They assume that the blind are not their market</b>.  Following this, the assumption is that allowing the blind an exemption to copyright is thus, a bad thing.<br />
<br />
Am I misreading that?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c142</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:34:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c142</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The way you defend pirates. Heh, heh.<br />
<br />
I'd agree with you on this one except for your constant defense of KNOWN criminals like infringer-millionaire Dotcom of Mega; this is just a minor squawk on your anti-copyright agenda.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c140</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:33:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c140</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is actions like this that have convinced me that copyright needs to be abolished. It is being used as a lever to destroy the Internet, and the politicians are not worried about this because it would remove a means that allows citizens to organize themselves.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c116</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:33:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c116</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The way you defend pirates. Heh, heh.<br />
<br />
I'd agree with you on this one except for your constant defense of KNOWN criminals like infringer-millionaire Dotcom of Mega; this is just a minor squawk on your anti-copyright agenda.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c110</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:33:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c110</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So Mike, is it your position that registrars should be able to register domain names to sites that they know are committing criminal acts? I'm trying to understand what the problem is here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c104</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:32:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c104</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The way you defend pirates. Heh, heh.<br />
<br />
I'd agree with you on this one except for your constant defense of KNOWN criminals like infringer-millionaire Dotcom of Mega; this is just a minor squawk on your anti-copyright agenda.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c87</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:31:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c87</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The way you defend pirates. Heh, heh.<br />
<br />
I'd agree with you on this one except for your constant defense of KNOWN criminals like infringer-millionaire Dotcom of Mega; this is just a minor squawk on your anti-copyright agenda.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c651</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:28:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c651</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote> He just pulls out that excuse when anyone challenges him to state a concrete position on copyright policy.</blockquote><br />
<br />
Actually, he pulls out that excuse when you've tried to badger him into answering an oversimplified, black-or-white, are-you-for-it-or-against-it question.<br />
<br />
His response has never been that he has no opinion. It's that he doesn't have the sort of binary opinion you demand.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>