<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c794</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:54:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c794</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because one is still the most guilty, the rest are more aiding and abetting, albeit to different degrees. But yes, the same felony associations that get used on normal people should be applied here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c202</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:54:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c202</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>How is this different to traditional publishers?</i><br />
<br />
It's not one bit different. But because it's a tech company Masnick thinks it's cool.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yup, the &quot;new business model&quot; is free money!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c159</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:53:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c159</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mike sez: "I'm obviously a big fan of crowdfunding platforms like Kickstarter," and it's off-the-top FIVE PERCENT TAKE. That's the kind of idea Mike likes: LOTS OF MONEY for almost no effort.<br />
<br />
Look guys, most music and movies are made with expectation of getting money, and copyright is simply common law recognition of who made it and attempt to see that those persons and no others get the rewards. Copyright IS crowfunding. You wouldn't need Kickstarter in the absence of commercialized piracy such as Megaupload! "File hosts" break the connection between fans and creators, besides break the law in getting money from works they didn't produce.<br />
<br />
And now supposed "patronage", eh? This is even less likely to work because breaks the direct connection between product and paying: eventually patrons are going to wonder why they're paying. -- You can't compete with free when it's your own product! If you encourage free distribution without some moral hook then most people will take it for free. You might as well just stick to traditional copyright that's been proven for over a hundred years.<br />
<br />
<br />
"a blog like ours that produces a bunch of content every day," -- HA! Talk about self-aggrandizing! You re-write from what others did last week! That's EASY. -- Just try offering some real world solutions rather than gushing over the latest scam or your endless complaints.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>Take a loopy tour of <b>Techdirt.com!</b> You always end up same place!</i><br />
<a href='http://techdirt.com/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/</a><br />
<i>Mike may sell a few T-shirts with <b>Techdirt</b> logo, but I bet his lunch dates are open.</i><br />
<i>01:51:30[b-602-3]</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Violent Games</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/10391523084/vp-joe-biden-believes-theres-no-legal-reason-government-cant-slap-sin-tax-violent-media.shtml#c614</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muunuu]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:53:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/10391523084/vp-joe-biden-believes-theres-no-legal-reason-government-cant-slap-sin-tax-violent-media.shtml#c614</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good. For once, game developers SHOULD explore sexuality. This American hinderness and fear on sex is just plain stupid. Over 30% of players are adults yet we are continuous treated like brain-dead little kids with spooked out parents. This is why the game industry NEVER grows in far as adult-life goes. I can never get a game that talks about anything that is adult, we always get these generic PG-13 crap games with gore and blood thrown in because the game developers and publishers are whimps. Yet I can find the material easily in a book or movie. <br />
<br />
I am tired of playing games with constant violence and blood in them, yet I can't strip my characters down without someone crying tears about it. One thing about the sex though I don't like how this nation constantly puts the female up as this big-breasted creature and that's the ONLY way a female body is suppose to look like.<br />
<br />
Lots of love for the D and F cups, lots of hate for the B and A cups. <br />
<br />
This is why I love South Korea and Japanese games the most. They give me what is lacking severely in western titled games. Seriously though we need to get over sexuality being this very voodoo thing. Face it, teen pregnancies or whatever are happening. Without the video-games. <br />
<br />
Video-games are NEVER the cause for any real-life trauma. So we need to stop blaming inanimated objects for the actions of whack-jobs in the real world, who's actions have existed before the creation of video-games by other kooky or evil people.<br />
<br />
Murders have always happened. A video-game does not cause or is the blame for murder. Same with rape. Rape has happened video-games do not cause rapes. <br />
<br />
If the game industry would stop being such whimps, we would see more meaningful plot-twists and truly adult-themed topics in games. But if the audience can't handle anything that isn't sanitized to the great beyond, then we'll continue to stay in the idiot bubble. And the 'games are only for kids' crowd that is plaguing the market.<br />
<br />
We're STILL stuck in the big huge Nintendo era of censorship.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: paywall</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c155</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Muir]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:53:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c155</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is not a paywall.  It is a <b>crowdpatron</b> system.  In the very old days, under patronage, one rich dude would pay an artist to produce works for him.  With the Internet, individuals can pay a small amount to support their favorite artist, but add many individuals together and you potentially have an artist making a decent living via ongoing payment for production.<br />
<br />
This is better than the current regime in several ways.  Most importantly it funds FUTURE work of an ARTIST's own creation, and does not extort money out of people for the PAST work of OTHERS.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c786</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:52:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c786</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, but it is more likely that the detention could be a police van or cell than their own homes?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c279</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shon Gale]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:50:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c279</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[People still buy AT&amp;T? Stupid!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Necessity is the mother of invention</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c150</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:48:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c150</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So setting up a paywall to charge people to watch digital videos is indispensable and necessary?  I guess it's right up there with food and water, right?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: paywall</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c138</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:47:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c138</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How can charging people to see certain things not be a paywall?  You still have to pay to see at least some of the content (the good stuff).<br />
<br />
That is a paywall.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c280</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:46:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c280</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[When you are abusing anonymity to actively harm people (and there is no way you can say that lawsuits are not 'harm') then no, you should probably have to make a declaration.<br />
<br />
How can you possibly expect to sue someone for breaking a patent without actually a) declaring what the patent is (Microsoft pay heed!) and b) saying who has a financial interest (even if it is only to the court officials)?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Need to add copyright owners to the list!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c271</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Power Guy Rules]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:44:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c271</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Take a good look at Prendaholes who are abusing the shell companies.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c199</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:44:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c199</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>The writers are writing the stories simnply for the love of the series/movie, without thought of profit </b><br />
<br />
You don't think that profit motivation will change all that?  All of a sudden you will have writers not really interested in the series will be cuing up to churn out material with the hope of a marginal profit.  <br />
<br />
Money changes everything.<br />
<br />
<b>The licensors (tv/movie studios) control the rights, so even if one of these fanfic stories prove good enough to adapt into an episode or film, the studio, not Amazon makes the money on it.</b><br />
<br />
Incorrect. Amazon would hold the rights to the story, and they could then license it to the studio for development.  There is nothing that says Amazon would be the ones making movies or whatnot.  Why think so narrowly?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c296</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:39:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c296</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's a little different a company having internal access to material (and we don't know if it's everything) and then that access being made 'publicly' available to the government (yours and any other that cares to investigate).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Use Your Own Content</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c920</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:35:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c920</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And the NYT never ever ever profits off other people's work or unpaid resources?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c917</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:35:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c917</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If this is fair use, then there's nothing stopping someone from just going to Flickr, pulling non-CC licensed images, and using them in an advertisement. You call companies out for pulling that kind of shit all the time. How is this any different?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c909</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:33:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c909</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Show me the line in the Constitution where it effectively says "Any copying of any material that may possibly be covered by copyright is automatically infringing"...<br />
<br />
Fair use butthurts copyright maniacs. And no, this could be out of fair use - but you refuse to even countenance it unless it's you 'infringing'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c364</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greevar]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:31:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c364</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What are you talking about? Haven't you heard of The Pirate Party? And the reason they haven't accomplished that goal is because the opposition has way more money, which is the only thing that talks in government. After all, money has been deemed speech and that means the *IAA have more speech than any grass roots org does.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c893</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:30:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c893</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, if you wish to say that you can reproduce a similar effect (note: I haven't been able to see either) a lot simpler and cheaper (which NYT might well be interested in for their own purposes), then using a selection of the original content may well be seen to be more useful.<br />
<br />
Of course, some lorem ipsum might be safer, if less good as an illustration, especially if your point is precisely "we can generate this for 1% of the resources, why are you paying those cowboys?". <br />
<br />
And I'll sympathise more with papers the day they pay people who feature in their stories for the stories they write. (Which of course would be wrong in many cases.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c191</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:25:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c191</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["depends on the original work- the Star Wars EU isn't much more than fanfiction where the author has said that it actually happened in the canonical universe."<br />
<br />
Star Wars (unlike Star Trek) kept a tighter control on continuity and used already-published authors.<br />
Trek (primarily Pocket Books) used fanfic writers and stated that, except for adaptations of movies &amp; TV episodes, the stories weren't canonical.<br />
Pity since some authors, like comics scribe Peter David, did first-rate material that deserves to be part of the overall Trek Universes (Yes, it's plural).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Just like a book deal, but worse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c189</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:24:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c189</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I suppose the bit that makes the 35% cut look particularly bad to me is the transfer of the copyright over the story. <br />
<br />
If it was instead a <i>license</i> or something similar, where Amazon was legally allowed to act as seller, but the author still retained all other rights over the story, I wouldn't consider that too bad of a deal, it's just as-is writers would basically be handing over the rights to their works for nothing more than the <i>potential</i> of profit in the future.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>