<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c128</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[corwin155]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:06:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c128</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Classic misdirection <br />
something President Obama does very , very well]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c123</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:59:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c123</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This administration has been doing it's best to control what appears in the news and how it is presented. There's a whole series of 'incidents' where White House news reporters were taken off the news staff for writing unflattering articles or asking difficult questions. There's another series of reports of reporters being badgered and cussed after an article went out in the news the next day. There's also been complaints about how little the White House news staff can actually access the president and ask questions. At the same time, the White House has been bypassing the traditional media for doing their own releases without the news media so that it is highly controlled to what is put before the public. <br />
<br />
The whole point of the above, as well as the use of the spy laws to prosecute whistle blowers, and the level of secrecy involved with FOI requests shows this administration is hell bent on hiding what ever they are doing. Even to the point of making legal theory of what they think the laws says, not what it reads to say, and then claiming that theory to be a national secret that can't be told. <br />
<br />
When was the last time you were expected to obey laws you don't know about and can't be told about? <br />
<br />
Something seriously stinks.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Leakers and the government</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c99</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[GrrlGeek1972]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:57:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c99</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I firmly support the Press as a brake on the government.  Having said that, I have serious concerns about this case, along with the Fox "News" reporter and his leak concerning the North Koreans.<br />
<br />
Both of these cases caused it to become known that we had human intelligence sources inside regimes/organizations that are REALLY REALLY hard to get inside sources to penetrate.  North Korea and Al Queda are paranoid, insular, and really nasty.  Getting a double agent into either of them is something I would consider important.<br />
<br />
So, while it is the nature of governments to cover their asses by over-classifying anything that would embarrass them, sometimes there really is a really good reason NOT to leak something.<br />
<br />
How do we draw the line?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c48</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wally]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:52:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c48</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How about the cost of the vats full of chemicals used to create the laser...all 500 gallons of it...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: The story that just keeps on giving</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c439</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:50:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c439</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is a judge's job to know when lawyers are in contempt of court and deserve to be sanctioned - this was not about copyright, this was about unethical, fraudulent behavior before the court, by a bunch of crooked lawyers who were abusing the court process as a business scheme.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/15490323152/intellectual-property-mess-holding-up-tpp.shtml#c357</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:48:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/15490323152/intellectual-property-mess-holding-up-tpp.shtml#c357</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wow Bob, that is very convincing. I'm totally swayed now by your vast reasoning and logical arguments!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1045</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:48:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1045</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They had all these cops in the same area and not one of them had a close up camera of their own (ie: a car cam) recording this whole event? Yet they thought they could get away with taking someone elses camera unlawfully? If they really needed footage they should have had their own cameras recording the whole thing. Before taking anyone elses footage they had better make sure they have footage and enough evidence to prove their innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. It is their responsibility. They failed here. There is no good reason they could not have had their own cameras, after all, they record us and provide footage when it's to their advantage. They wrongfully took someone elses footage and failed to provide the necessary evidence to absolve them of guilt. I want murder convictions. It should be an automatic. No legal technicality can change the injustice it would be not to sentence them to murder.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c24</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atkray]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:47:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c24</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[One can only hope that Nguyen/Syfert now have the 80k that should have been paid in Calif.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Window dressing to conceal shift from payoffs to coercion.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c95</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wally]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:47:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c95</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Blue, the Obama administration knew exactly what was going on...and did nothing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c72</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wally]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:41:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c72</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mike, is there anything in that Press Shield bill that actually protects you as a journalist?  I mean let's face it, you guys are getting the same treatment your constituents did in the Nixon years.  <br />
<br />
This is left field off at first: As for your skepticism about the Obama Administration's sincerity, I don't blame you one bit because this same administration knew about the IRS scandal as early as this year's tax day.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1034</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:40:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1034</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's amazing how cops are quick to record everything and show cameras when they are in fact innocent. Now they wrongfully steal someone elses camera and they can't prove their innocence. No forensic analysis circus can change that. They should be presumed guilty.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1646</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:34:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1646</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm curious, AJ. What makes you think you deserve a response, from anyone? Be specific, please. I need more comedy today.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1023</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:34:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1023</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It should be unlawful for them to be able to confiscate evidence without providing substantial evidence that they didn't tamper with it. The confiscation of the evidence should be recorded and the evidence should have very carefully been in the sight of a camera the entire time it was in the possession of the police with everything on the screen and all buttons pressed and the possession of any memory cards being within the range of camera until the phone is returned to its rightful owner. The footage of how the phone was handled needs to be made public. If there is even a second that the phone was not within the range of the footage, even the slight possibility that an object may have been switched (ie: one memory card with another), then murder conviction should be an automatic. Upon wrongfully confiscating evidence, when cops are a suspect, their guilt needs to be absolved with substantial proof. It's too late now for them to provide that proof, it's too late for anyone to provide that proof at this point. They have failed to provide the necessary proof of their innocence unless they can in fact turn up that footage and it proves their innocence which, it seems, doesn't seem to be the case. They are guilty and I want murder convictions. Anything short of that is an outrageous injustice. I WANT MURDER CONVICTIONS!!!!!!!!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1636</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:32:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1636</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As usual, AJ, you have no point. When you realize this, all will be clear.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1008</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:24:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1008</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't care. What happened here is an injustice. They took the recording device and now they can't provide me with sufficient evidence (the footage) necessary to prove their innocence. They should be presumed guilty until proven innocent and the burden of proof of their innocence needs to be high, as in providing me with footage. They're guilty and I want murder convictions.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: The story that just keeps on giving</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c429</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessie]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:23:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c429</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["So what would you call more than one judge?"<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The harbingers of the apocalypse.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1687</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:22:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1687</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So when some idiot tells you to "Suck my dick" or "Kiss my ass" you report them for making an unwanted sexual invitation?<br />
<br />
That couldn't possibly be open to abuse]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Window dressing to conceal shift from payoffs to coercion.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c67</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digdug]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:21:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c67</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Are you saying all journalists are soulless sell-outs or just some of them? If it's the latter I'll agree to that. If it's the former I'm afraid we part ways. Like any group of people, there's the bad ones, the good ones, and the ones in between just trying not to get stepped on.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1183</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sacredjunk]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:10:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1183</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, that isn't the worst<br />
<br />
Here, you can get arrested for liking a facebook post (which speaks the truth)<br />
<a href='http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/2-mumbai-girls-in-jail-for-tweet-against-bal-thackeray/1/229846.html' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/2-mumbai-girls-in-jail-for-tweet-against-bal-thackeray/1/229846.html</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c230</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:09:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c230</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, you didn't miss anything. A cowardly hosting company elected to take down an entire blog over a DMCA notice about an infringing picture. The situation was exacerbated by the dope claiming victory and doing a touchdown dance over the host's gross over-reaction. That's why this is a huge non-event. Nothing in the DMCA <i>required</i> the host to go off of the deep end the way they did.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>