<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c279</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shon Gale]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:50:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c279</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[People still buy AT&amp;T? Stupid!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Necessity is the mother of invention</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c150</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:48:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c150</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So setting up a paywall to charge people to watch digital videos is indispensable and necessary?  I guess it's right up there with food and water, right?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: paywall</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c138</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:47:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c138</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How can charging people to see certain things not be a paywall?  You still have to pay to see at least some of the content (the good stuff).<br />
<br />
That is a paywall.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c280</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:46:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c280</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[When you are abusing anonymity to actively harm people (and there is no way you can say that lawsuits are not 'harm') then no, you should probably have to make a declaration.<br />
<br />
How can you possibly expect to sue someone for breaking a patent without actually a) declaring what the patent is (Microsoft pay heed!) and b) saying who has a financial interest (even if it is only to the court officials)?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Need to add copyright owners to the list!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c271</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Power Guy Rules]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:44:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c271</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Take a good look at Prendaholes who are abusing the shell companies.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c199</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:44:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c199</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>The writers are writing the stories simnply for the love of the series/movie, without thought of profit </b><br />
<br />
You don't think that profit motivation will change all that?  All of a sudden you will have writers not really interested in the series will be cuing up to churn out material with the hope of a marginal profit.  <br />
<br />
Money changes everything.<br />
<br />
<b>The licensors (tv/movie studios) control the rights, so even if one of these fanfic stories prove good enough to adapt into an episode or film, the studio, not Amazon makes the money on it.</b><br />
<br />
Incorrect. Amazon would hold the rights to the story, and they could then license it to the studio for development.  There is nothing that says Amazon would be the ones making movies or whatnot.  Why think so narrowly?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c296</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:39:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c296</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's a little different a company having internal access to material (and we don't know if it's everything) and then that access being made 'publicly' available to the government (yours and any other that cares to investigate).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Use Your Own Content</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c920</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:35:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c920</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And the NYT never ever ever profits off other people's work or unpaid resources?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c917</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:35:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c917</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If this is fair use, then there's nothing stopping someone from just going to Flickr, pulling non-CC licensed images, and using them in an advertisement. You call companies out for pulling that kind of shit all the time. How is this any different?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c909</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:33:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c909</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Show me the line in the Constitution where it effectively says "Any copying of any material that may possibly be covered by copyright is automatically infringing"...<br />
<br />
Fair use butthurts copyright maniacs. And no, this could be out of fair use - but you refuse to even countenance it unless it's you 'infringing'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c364</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greevar]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:31:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c364</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What are you talking about? Haven't you heard of The Pirate Party? And the reason they haven't accomplished that goal is because the opposition has way more money, which is the only thing that talks in government. After all, money has been deemed speech and that means the *IAA have more speech than any grass roots org does.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c893</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:30:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c893</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, if you wish to say that you can reproduce a similar effect (note: I haven't been able to see either) a lot simpler and cheaper (which NYT might well be interested in for their own purposes), then using a selection of the original content may well be seen to be more useful.<br />
<br />
Of course, some lorem ipsum might be safer, if less good as an illustration, especially if your point is precisely "we can generate this for 1% of the resources, why are you paying those cowboys?". <br />
<br />
And I'll sympathise more with papers the day they pay people who feature in their stories for the stories they write. (Which of course would be wrong in many cases.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c191</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:25:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c191</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["depends on the original work- the Star Wars EU isn't much more than fanfiction where the author has said that it actually happened in the canonical universe."<br />
<br />
Star Wars (unlike Star Trek) kept a tighter control on continuity and used already-published authors.<br />
Trek (primarily Pocket Books) used fanfic writers and stated that, except for adaptations of movies &amp; TV episodes, the stories weren't canonical.<br />
Pity since some authors, like comics scribe Peter David, did first-rate material that deserves to be part of the overall Trek Universes (Yes, it's plural).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Just like a book deal, but worse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c189</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:24:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c189</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I suppose the bit that makes the 35% cut look particularly bad to me is the transfer of the copyright over the story. <br />
<br />
If it was instead a <i>license</i> or something similar, where Amazon was legally allowed to act as seller, but the author still retained all other rights over the story, I wouldn't consider that too bad of a deal, it's just as-is writers would basically be handing over the rights to their works for nothing more than the <i>potential</i> of profit in the future.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c180</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:24:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c180</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/sara-sheridan/writers-earnings-cultural-myth_b_3136859.html' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/sara-sheridan/writers-earnings-cultural-myth_b_3136859.html</a><br />
<br />
Your argument is invalid.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wargames</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c286</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RyanNerd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:24:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c286</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anyone who was alive and watched "hacking" movies during the 80's knows that there is always a back door and that this will prevent WWIII.<br />
<br />
"Do you want to play a game?"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It funny to read all of this</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1991</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:20:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1991</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You were actually being quite reasonable until that last unnecessary dig.<br />
<br />
We could just as equally say "calling the cops and making harmless fun an arrestable offence is just the kind of overreach that content controllors and copywrong maximalists and patent trolls buy laws for".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c158</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:20:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c158</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I gotta ask, is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction? I'm not really interested in fan-fiction myself, so maybe I just don't have the right perspective."<br />
<br />
Quite frankly, a good 3/4 of Star Trek novels are just fanfic with the "naughty bits" expunged.<br />
Yet they sell.<br />
<br />
(Star Wars has a better track record of using profesional authors and maintaining continuity.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zero tolerance is the result of the 60's not cured by it</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1982</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:17:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1982</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, and Conservative "Respect my authoritah!" attitudes are so much better. Along with turning a blind eye on any bullying of anyone darker than a light sun-tan, of anyone who isn't a jock, of anyone who isn't hetero-male-overcompensating, of anyone 'different'. Because the world was so much a better place 30-60 years ago, and nothing's improved.<br />
<br />
Yes people go too far with political correctness. But there is still so far to go. It's just getting the balance right.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c154</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:15:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c154</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Amazon is paying for the rights to use the characters, and then turning around and taking ownership of the resulting works. Essentially, they are just middle-manning to clear rights to use the characters, at an insanely high cost to the writer."<br />
<br />
As usual, ass with no brain, you're wrong.<br />
The writers are writing the stories simnply for the love of the series/movie, without thought of profit (as hard as it is for a copyright maximalist like you to believe).<br />
Amazon has simply come up with a way for the studios and writers to make money!<br />
<br />
"Perhaps they are a facilitator for the moment, but that will likely turn to greed if one of the works gets developed into an actual TV episode or movie."<br />
<br />
The licensors (tv/movie studios) control the rights, so even if one of these fanfic stories prove good enough to adapt into an episode or film, the studio, not Amazon makes the money on it.<br />
Amazon only makes money on copies of the stories sold through it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>