<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>There has been an update posted on Facebook</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c487</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[tawsenior]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:51:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c487</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[WORLD NUTELLA DAY: A POSITIVE CONCLUSION <br />
<br />
Positive direct contact between Ferrero and Sara Rosso, owner of the non-official Nutella fan page World Nutella Day, has brought an end to the case.<br />
Ferrero would like to express to Sara Rosso its sincere gratitude for her passion for Nutella, gratitude which is extended to all fans of the World Nutella Day.<br />
The case arose from a routine brand defense procedure that was activated as a result of some misuse of the Nutella brand on the fan page.<br />
Ferrero is pleased to announce that today, after contacting Sara Rosso and finding together the appropriate solutions, it immediately stopped the previous action.<br />
Ferrero considers itself fortunate to have such devoted and loyal fans of its Nutella spread, like Sara Rosso.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c876</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:50:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c876</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wait, I thought unlocking was illegal but rooting was fine?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c860</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:49:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c860</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Which is utterly ridiculous.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cookies</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/16481921080/house-republicans-copyright-law-destroys-markets-its-time-real-reform.shtml#c3658</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Dirt (Deer-tay)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:48:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/16481921080/house-republicans-copyright-law-destroys-markets-its-time-real-reform.shtml#c3658</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I want a cookie!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c837</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:47:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c837</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[rather than ask Congress that when you have actually bought something, why would you not own it, perhaps the thing to ask them is on what occasions do the members of Congress consider that anything they have bought is not actually owned by them? how many items have they bought that they think they are not entitled to sell on, give away or part exchange, should they choose to? how many items have they, their families or any of the children bought that they then think they dont own but are actually only renting or have a license to use it until the producer decides you cant use it any more or makes using it impossible?<br />
<br />
maybe if they were to ask themselves questions like these, they may then understand what the hell people are talking about and why they get SO FUCKING ANNOYED WHEN THEY ARE STOPPED FROM DOING WHAT THEY WANT WITH SOMETHING THEY HAVE PAID OUT HARD EARNED CASH FOR!!!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c830</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[rapnel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:47:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c830</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I suppose you want to allow anyone you'd like to stay in your home too? Friggen kids.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: From the other side...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130509/02140223018/new-data-exposes-scammy-hospital-pricing-now-lets-crowdsource-some-more.shtml#c632</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DP2u]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:45:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130509/02140223018/new-data-exposes-scammy-hospital-pricing-now-lets-crowdsource-some-more.shtml#c632</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This argument does not hold true for the uninsured.  Doctors and hospitals should be able to provide pricing information to the uninsured in advance or providing services (except emergencies).  As Steven Brill's article makes clear, it is the uninsured and underinsured who are being taken advantage of by health care providers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c823</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:44:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c823</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>And please address my point and explain whether you agree that this will indeed weaken copyright holders' rights.</i><br />
<br />
The public benefits from weakened damages, increased production, and other added benefits.  Copyright is not weakened.  It's more in line with the demands of the public that benefits.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c65</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:43:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c65</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I know right. I mean seriously who wouldn't look that up.  Except that they a abusing a law intended for something else entirely but I am sure you just skipped that part.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c1076</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[art guerrilla]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:42:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c1076</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[how 'bout 'causing actual harm to children' by droneing them (an arguable war krime)to death from half a planet away ?<br />
<br />
a 'good' or an 'evil' ?<br />
most would say 'evil' (why am i guessing you will make excuses for your war-kriminal betters?), but NONE of the perps of these krimes against humanity will EVER see an indictment, much less trial, much less prison...<br />
<br />
what does that tell you ?<br />
<br />
(assuming you have an open mind)<br />
<br />
OUR SOCIETY IS IRRETRIEVABLY CORRUPTED<br />
<br />
but, heh, let's jail some poor puke who gets a hard-on for kiddie stories...<br />
*snort*<br />
<br />
(why is it we jail child rapists for longer than child killers ? who does this make sense to ?)<br />
<br />
PRIORITIES, kampers, priorities...<br />
<br />
art guerrilla<br />
aka ann archy<br />
eof]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c812</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:42:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c812</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I thought he was talking about copyright holders' rights under the DMCA, but even if he means the rights under Section 106, those would clearly be weakened as well. Permitting the trafficking of technologies that can be used to circumvent access controls would weaken copyright rights since people would obviously use them for infringement despite infringement being illegal. He's trying to say that by taking away these copyright holders' protections, their rights will somehow not be weakened. It's silly. I don't care if you or he or anyone is for this proposal, but at least admit that it weakens copyright holders' rights.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c937</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:41:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c937</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This kid clearly needs to work on his limited vocabulary. He will never make it in the rap game with the small amount of adjectives he currently has in his arsenal. It really speaks volumes about out education system. This is what was got from no child left behind?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c52</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[rapnel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:40:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c52</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I suppose you want to own your cell phone too?  Hippies.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c49</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:40:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c49</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[C'mon man don't dump on someone just because they assume them laws on a particular are sensable, even if the laws have been on the books for decades or whatever.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c48</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:40:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c48</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Overuse of ellipses, "lol", random capitalization of "Blogger"...<br />
<br />
Yep, I'm afraid you're a fucking moron.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c38</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:39:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c38</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA['overzealous enforcement officials'<br />
<br />
that needs changing so it reads what it really means <br />
<br />
'over-bribed enforcement officials' would probably be nearer the mark!<br />
<br />
so, a little bit of clarification, please. if you 'can't rent out your place for less than 29 days' how do other places (hotels, guest houses etc) get on when someone wants a 2 week break only? are they forced to stay 2 more weeks against their will? are they forced not to come at all, because staying a shorter period would turn the break/holiday into a crime? do the accommodating establishments have to lie about the length of stay for all guests and lose payments for half the year? like a lot of laws, there is no rhyme or reason for them in today's society, but they hang around on purpose for just such situations!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c799</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:38:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c799</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>What copyrights are being weakened, buskahosa?</i><br />
<br />
Allowing the trafficking of technologies that can be used to circumvent access controls would weaken copyright holders' rights--both their exclusive rights under Section 106 and their anticircumvention rights under Section 1201. The fact that Mike supports this should tell you that it weakens copyright rights.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1112</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:37:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1112</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ticky tacky<br />
   ticky tacky<br />
       hummmmmmm]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c786</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:36:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c786</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He already explained that in his post.  I am trying to figure out what you meant.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c767</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:36:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c767</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As the law stands, it's illegal to circumvent access controls or to traffic in such access controls. This protects copyright holders' exclusive rights. Removing those protections would weaken those rights. Hence, Mike's support of the proposal. That it would still be illegal to infringe misses the point that this would make it EASIER to infringe.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>