<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/01074822975/gaijin-entertainment-demands-gaijincom-which-predates-them-doesnt-infringe-their-trademark.shtml#c624</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bergman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 21:08:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/01074822975/gaijin-entertainment-demands-gaijincom-which-predates-them-doesnt-infringe-their-trademark.shtml#c624</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And yet, Washington state still retains both the Olympic Mountains, the city of Olympia and Mount Olympus.  Apparently a U.S. state is too big for the IOC to bully.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c160</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 21:04:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c160</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They'll switch back once popular channel owners report they've lost 99% of their subscribers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Wrong take. It's that the Youtube &quot;free&quot; model doesn't work.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c153</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 21:04:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c153</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[War is Peace<br />
Freedom is Slavery<br />
Ignorance is Strength<br />
Armed Robbery is Commerce<br />
<br />
Shall I go on?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/11472022963/royalty-collection-agency-sabam-sues-belgian-isps-pursuit-its-34-piracy-license.shtml#c743</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[tqk]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 21:00:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/11472022963/royalty-collection-agency-sabam-sues-belgian-isps-pursuit-its-34-piracy-license.shtml#c743</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>I'd just file an exact counter suit for 3.4 percent cut for the 'rampant commercial success they enable through their networks'</blockquote><br />
As one who never "pirates" copyrighted content (I boycott them), I'd consider suing for slander.  How dare they assume the right to judge me?  My ISP connection is used to infringe copyright?  Nuh uhh!<br />
<br />
Chutzpah.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Wrong take. It's that the Youtube &quot;free&quot; model doesn't work.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c141</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:56:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c141</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Up is down. Black is white. OotB is sane.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wrong take. It's that the Youtube &quot;free&quot; model doesn't work.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c122</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:54:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c122</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gosh, that seemed obvious when read it days ago, kept it handy to gig you with. But you came up with such a wacky mis-take that you foiled me!<br />
<br />
"If anything, this just seems like a tool with which Hollywood can hang itself." ... Umm, HUH? How the HELL can you even TRY to turn this against them? In my view, "Hollywood" is just going to sit back and watch Youtube fail (financially, though Google may subsidize it indefinitely), and thereby PROVE their notions.<br />
<br />
Youtube isn't actually making money so is putting up a paywall, JUST LIKE those you call "dinosaurs" attempted. -- Oh, that reminds me. Turns out you're wrong yet again on that very point, some paywalls DO work!<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/199331/pay-walls-boost-some-newspaper-circs.html#axzz2RzNz20zG' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/199331/pay-walls-boost-some-newspaper-circs.html#axzz2RzNz20zG</a><br />
<br />
"While publications of all sizes have benefited from digital subscription strategies, big names continued to lead the way. The Wall Street Journal maintained its lead as the country]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c102</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiterkansas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:49:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c102</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And these channels might update once a week.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c88</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:49:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c88</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah its google going here's your paywall good luck getting anyone to care.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/01074822975/gaijin-entertainment-demands-gaijincom-which-predates-them-doesnt-infringe-their-trademark.shtml#c602</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[S. T. Stone]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:47:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/01074822975/gaijin-entertainment-demands-gaijincom-which-predates-them-doesnt-infringe-their-trademark.shtml#c602</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Too easy. Low hanging fruit's for suckers and OOTB.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c73</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norm De Guerre]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:39:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c73</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's more expensive than cable. So eager to taunt "Masnick", you forgot to actually make sense. Per usual,<br />
<br />
You're hilarious... jackhole.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c59</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[S. T. Stone]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:35:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c59</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think the braintrust at YouTube failed to realize exactly why Netflix and Hulu work as well as they do as pay services: the abundance of content. When you pay for Hulu Plus or Netflix, you get thousands of hours of content right off the bat.<br />
<br />
How much content do these paid channels plan to provide right off the bat? How much content do these paid channels plan to provide on a regular basis? What do the groups behind these paid channels consider]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c37</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:34:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c37</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[$100 for 50 channels isn't high? I can get 200 channels for $150.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/18203522969/did-fbi-counterterrorism-agent-reveal-that-feds-now-record-all-phone-calls.shtml#c478</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:31:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/18203522969/did-fbi-counterterrorism-agent-reveal-that-feds-now-record-all-phone-calls.shtml#c478</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's because they don't.<br />
<br />
<b>Every</b> phone call? Think for a moment about exactly what such a thing would entail.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c24</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:28:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00385422973/youtube-once-again-building-paywall-which-old-media-can-hang-itself.shtml#c24</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>$1.99/month per channel. That seems... pretty high. </i><br />
<br />
lol<br />
<br />
You're hilarious Masnick.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/12235622980/john-steele-plans-to-appeal-judge-wrights-order-says-judge-is-no-fan-ip-law.shtml#c782</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steele's statements to AVN]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:25:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/12235622980/john-steele-plans-to-appeal-judge-wrights-order-says-judge-is-no-fan-ip-law.shtml#c782</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://business.avn.com/articles/legal/Sanctioned-Copyright-Lawyer-Says-He-Will-Appeal-Judge-s-Order-516284.html' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://business.avn.com/articles/legal/Sanctioned-Copyright-Lawyer-Says-He-Will-Appeal-Judge-s-Order-516284.html</a><br />
<br />
[...] Regarding the referral for sanctions imposed by Judge Wright, Steele said,]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/12235622980/john-steele-plans-to-appeal-judge-wrights-order-says-judge-is-no-fan-ip-law.shtml#c765</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:23:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/12235622980/john-steele-plans-to-appeal-judge-wrights-order-says-judge-is-no-fan-ip-law.shtml#c765</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[When Steele was giving this "We will Appeal and be victorious" speech, was there circus music playing in the back round? You would have to think Steele must fell like a clown giving that statement knowing the noose is tightening around their necks.<br />
<br />
Steele and Prenda anytime they have been challenged have always put up the big front and Huffed and Puffed and got no where.<br />
<br />
What do these guys think the chances are that they will have success on appeal? We all know what happened in the Florida case where Lutz got questioned and Steele was there and when the Judge quizzed Lutz he didn't know this or that and couldn't name anyone at AF Holdings. <br />
<br />
The Judge in Florida declared that there was a fraud on the court and Steele &amp; Duffy are facing sanctions there.<br />
<br />
Then you have the case in San Francisco Where Judge Chen in another Prenda case wants to see the signed ADR that bears "Salt Marsh" signature and that was supposed to be presented by April 29 2013.<br />
<br />
You can bet your ass now that Judge wright's report is going to go to other courts that are hearing any Prenda cases will be tuned into what is going on with Prenda and those involved in Prenda and their various cases.<br />
<br />
I would also have to believe that the Appeals court will be made aware of the other cases and the Judges rulings in them and Prenda actions concerning them.<br />
<br />
Sorry to say but these guys are history, I think Steele, Duffy Gibbs and Hansmeier will be sitting around the fire at the rail yard beside the boxcar, and relishing the days of old where they would chase ambulances and divorce cases and think of how good they had it as they are passing around that bottle of Scotch Ripple while waiting for the can of beans to finish cooking.<br />
<br />
These guys have been long on the fringe side of the law, from their copyright trolling suits to their other side line of filing as an intervener in class actions suits as an objector to a settlement... but willing to drop their objection for 30K ~ wink wink ~ nudge nudge.<br />
<br />
While they are gone for now I doubt we have seen the last of them, I hope the IRS and RICO will for once and all finish off these characters as they have crossed the line of right and wrong in my opinion.<br />
<br />
I thought Kevin Trudeau was the definition of a true criminal, but Kevin looks like a Saint compared to the Prenda gang!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/16340322966/judge-wright-tells-team-prenda-to-pay-80k-refers-their-activity-to-state-bars-feds-irs.shtml#c1001</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steele says he'll appeal]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:12:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/16340322966/judge-wright-tells-team-prenda-to-pay-80k-refers-their-activity-to-state-bars-feds-irs.shtml#c1001</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An article over at Xbiz quotes Steele as saying he's going to appeal Wright's ruling.  Yet another plot twist in this fascinating drama!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: NSA datacenter</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/18203522969/did-fbi-counterterrorism-agent-reveal-that-feds-now-record-all-phone-calls.shtml#c472</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paranoid anonymous coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:10:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/18203522969/did-fbi-counterterrorism-agent-reveal-that-feds-now-record-all-phone-calls.shtml#c472</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Technology newer than what we play with is powerful - check out this article about a NSA datacenter...<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/</a><br />
<br />
Might as well get used to it - it's our shiny new reality]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130502/10513922919/over-90-most-innovative-products-past-few-decades-were-not-patented.shtml#c366</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JP Jones]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 20:05:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130502/10513922919/over-90-most-innovative-products-past-few-decades-were-not-patented.shtml#c366</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Very few things can be considered "truely innovative."  Most innovation is a result of collaborative idea exchange.  Typically, it goes like this:<br />
1) Someone, or a group of someones, encounter a problem that they want to fix.<br />
2) They come up with an idea to fix it.  It doesn't work or works poorly.<br />
3) Someone else sees them trying to fix the problem, and comes up with a <i>better</i> idea.<br />
4) ...<br />
5) Innovation!<br />
<br />
I can't think of a single thing that wasn't created accidentally that was a result of one person spontaneously coming up with a great idea that everyone wanted to use.  Everything comes from people building on the works of others, whether it's inventions, art, politics...all these things are inherently part of society and not part of individuals.<br />
<br />
I personally believe the U.S.'s insane copyright laws (and they are insane, as in not based on logic or reason) is at least partially due to our extreme idealism of individualism.  The U.S. believes that the individual surpasses everything else, and that individuals are responsible for these creations.  It's a romantic idea, but it's completely false.  No piece of art, science, or technology exists without the influence of the society that created it, period.<br />
<br />
That's reality.  What we have is the ideal (copyright, you have the right to *your* idea/art/invention) conflicting with reality (your idea/art/invention isn't really yours, it's created from the culture you live in).  And it's creating extremely wonky results.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, copyright is as strongly ingrained into U.S. ideology as other myths, such as eating fats will make you fat and that the world is facing overpopulation.<br />
<br />
Oh no, if <i>that</i> doesn't get people riled up I don't know what will.  If even one person gets angry, goes online to look it up and prove me wrong then I've suceeded in opening a mind.<br />
<br />
But I'm not going to hold my breath.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/18203522969/did-fbi-counterterrorism-agent-reveal-that-feds-now-record-all-phone-calls.shtml#c455</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 19:58:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/18203522969/did-fbi-counterterrorism-agent-reveal-that-feds-now-record-all-phone-calls.shtml#c455</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They are not violating the constitution.  They have just redefined reasonable.  Because guns.  Because terrorism.  Because piracy.  Because kids.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>