<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>what a freak, and freaking JOKE</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c654</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:18:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c654</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Extortion anyone, oh but wait, he is the focus of Masnicks Bromance, so it's ok.<br />
<br />
Masnick would not want to do anything to rock the boat of his love affair with Mr Kim. (Bow when you say his name).<br />
<br />
Lets watch Mick the nick dance this fine line between reality and Masnicks dream world.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c635</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:16:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c635</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just like OOTB.  AJ doesn't actually read the entire article.  Otherwise he would have noticed that Mike said it was a bad idea.  It is much easier to make a stand when you take things out of context.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c633</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:14:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c633</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i><blockquote>"There's a name for that."</blockquote></i><br />
Yes there is. It is called <b>leverage</b>. In this case, it may be improperly conceived and/or applied, but it is a very common practice in negotiation, everywhere.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c822</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:14:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c822</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is certainly a delay tactic, the police have the preliminary coroner's report pending the toxicology report. Regardless of what the guy was on, toxicology isn't the portion determining the extent of the physical trauma which infers how badly he was beaten. It shouldn't get those guys off the hook for manslaughter if the report says the victim died of unrelated cyanide poisoning if it also states that he had a brain hemorrhage, ruptured internal organs, and internal bleeding such that each of the other conditions would have caused death moments later as well.<br />
<br />
With three to four months there's a good chance a FOIA might get the prelimary out, and is using that in it's investigation if they are trying at all. I suggest using the FBI's results of recoving the videos as the measure of how hard they are trying, because if the phones were returned to the individuals working, the FBI most certainly can recover the videos.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Alternativly, the birth of 3 factor authenication</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c609</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AndyD273]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:13:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c609</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Who's gonna be the first to patent it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c584</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:12:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c584</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>The reason for tech companies to support Kim Dotcom is because the legal theory behind the prosecution would end up gutting DMCA protection of entities running web sites with cusomter-provided content. The tech companies should do this in spite of Kim Dotcom's repulsive personality and flagrant behavior.</i><br />
<br />
That may be true. But they're not being asked. They're being told. As Masnick states above:<br />
<br />
"Specifically, he's asking them to help fund his defense, in exchange for not getting sued for the patent."<br />
<br />
Again, the ends are being used to justify the means. As long as you know what a stupendous hypocrite you are, I'm fine with this.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c573</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:09:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c573</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And you average-joe by making comments on this website you tooo are worshiping Mike, you may not think you are but you are doing so. Every comment is a worship to Mike didn't you know that so if you don't want to worship Mike then don't comment on this site, simple enough really.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Racketeering</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c562</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AndyD273]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:09:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c562</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Seems like it might depend a bit on the approach.<br />
<br />
Something like "hey guys, so I have this patent, and I really don't want to use it to sue anyone, but I have these legal bills and no money. Now, if I lose, it could hurt you too, so why not help me out, I'll license it to you at a very reasonable rate, and we can keep the lawyers out of it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>And THIS is why...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c22</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:08:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c22</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I make sure my phone isn't in my pants.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>35% Commission</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c430</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DanZee]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:07:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c430</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some people have noted the 35% cut (20% cut under 10,000 words) seems unfair.  I'm guessing Amazon is probably kicking back a third to the copyright holder as well.  But keep in mind writers who are published by major publishing companies sign deals where they get as little as $1 per hardcover sale and 25 cents per paperback sale, after all other expenses and advances are paid.  That's about a 5% commission, so it's important to put things into perspective.  <br />
<br />
As people have criticized, I agree that I don't like the fact that Amazon is taking over ownership of the work, but in the old days publishers use to file the copyright on published works and tie up novels for 28 years.  It's not too much different.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c557</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:05:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c557</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>what's going to happen that would affect others like Google? They are already protected by the DMCA</i><br />
<br />
So was Megaupload, they followed the DMCA, still had the safe harbors, the only reason they didn't take down one file was because law enforcement told them not to.<br />
<br />
So, by following the law, they got screwed over by the law.<br />
<br />
You think that wouldn't be something Google, Facebook or Twitter should worry about?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c319</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:04:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c319</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i><blockquote>blank look and the question "What's a port and why do I need 80 of them?"</blockquote></i><br />
LOL, or 65,000 of them for that matter.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>which one</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100518/2341299481.shtml#c3111</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[randy powell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:04:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100518/2341299481.shtml#c3111</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is BMI or ASCAP RUN BY COMMUNIST, DRUG CARTEL OR THE MOB]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c534</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:03:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c534</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Did you even read the article or are you just blowing smoke out of your ass again?<br />
<br />
First of all, if you read it, Mike's not condoning this behavior at all.<br />
<br />
Secondly, if Megaupload does go to trial and loses because Dotcom can't get the finances to fund his defense properly, how long until Google, Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, and other sites start getting hit with the same problems that Megaupload got hit with?  I'd assume not very long.<br />
<br />
So, even if it's something that none of us really like (and if it was anyone BUT Megaupload, you would be cheering for them suing Google, Facebook and Twitter), the fact is, the alternative of Megaupload losing the case is BAD for the rest of the internet.<br />
<br />
Or is your brain too alcohol-inebriated to understand that?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c513</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:03:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c513</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[LOL! It's one thing to ask for another's help, but quite another to threaten to sue another for patent infringement if they don't cave into your demand for money. There's a name for that. Oh yeah, patent trolling. If IV trolled someone but then pointed out that they should cave in because it was in their best interests on some unrelated matter, do you think Mike would think it was a good idea then? Of course not.<br />
<br />
Besides, what precedent vis-a-vis the DMCA will be set here? I don't think the DMCA applies in criminal cases, but even if it did, what's going to happen that would affect others like Google? They are already protected by the DMCA. Dotcom isn't going to affect that in any way I can think of. Maybe you can spell out the details for me? I mean, I'm stupid and you're smart, so it should be simple for you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c317</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:01:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c317</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Potential Game Changer</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c425</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruth Carter]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:01:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c425</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This could be game changer for copyright holders who license their work to Amazon. I wonder what this will do to organizations like Disney who are usually very protective of their copyrights and people like J.K. Rowling who don't oppose fan fiction so long as it's not erotic fiction. I wonder if they'll change their stances when they see there's money to be made from it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>which one</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100518/2341299481.shtml#c3088</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[randy powell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:01:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100518/2341299481.shtml#c3088</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is BMI or ASCAP RUN BY COMMUNIST, DRUG CARTEL OR THE MOB]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c497</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:58:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c497</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Joe are you really this dense or just trying to compete with blue?<br />
<br />
If you actually read what has ben written you'll see that Mike thinks it's stupid for Kim to be patent trolling.<br />
<br />
He does however make the point that these other companies might be in serious trouble if Km loses his case.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c491</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Treacher]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:57:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c491</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Your employer is showing.  Again.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>